Claude-code-ultimate-guide talk-stage1-extract
Extracts and structures source material (articles, transcripts, notes) into a talk summary with narrative arc, themes, metrics, and gaps. Auto-detects REX vs Concept type. Use when starting a new talk from any source material or auditing existing material before committing to a talk.
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/examples/skills/talk-pipeline/stage-1-extract" ~/.claude/skills/florianbruniaux-claude-code-ultimate-guide-talk-stage1-extract && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
examples/skills/talk-pipeline/stage-1-extract/SKILL.mdsource content
Talk Stage 1: Extract
Transforms raw material (article, transcript, notes, or a mix) into a structured summary ready for the pipeline's downstream stages. Auto-detects source type.
When to Use This Skill
- Starting a new talk from any source material
- First step of the talk pipeline (always run before other stages)
- Auditing existing source material before committing to a talk
What This Skill Does
- Collects metadata — asks for slug, event, date, duration, audience, mode if not provided
- Reads the source — loads the source file or inline content
- Detects source type — REX (real-world proof) vs Concept (ideas/thesis) based on content signals
- Extracts the narrative arc — chronological for REX, thematic for Concept
- Extracts metrics — every measurable number with its source
- Identifies main themes — 3-7 themes
- Flags gaps — what's missing for a complete talk
- Writes
{slug}-summary.md
Input
Required:
- Source file path or inline content (article
, transcript.mdx
, notes).md - Metadata:
,slug
,event
,date
,duration
,audience
(--rex or --concept)type
If metadata is missing →
AskUserQuestion before proceeding.
Output
talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-summary.md
Source Type Detection
| REX signals | Concept signals |
|---|---|
| Specific dates | Theses, arguments |
| Measured metrics | General observations |
| Project/tool names | Trend observations |
| Commits, releases, PRs | Analogies, metaphors |
| "I shipped", "We built" | "I think", "In my opinion" |
If hybrid → note both components in the summary.
Output Format
# Talk Summary — {Provisional Title} **Slug** : {slug} **Event** : {event} **Date** : {date} **Duration** : {duration} min **Audience** : {audience description} **Type detected** : REX | Concept | Hybrid **Source** : {source file path} --- ## Narrative Arc {Arc description: 3-5 sentences. Chronological if REX, thematic if Concept.} ## Main Themes | # | Theme | Short description | Weight | |---|-------|------------------|--------| | 1 | {theme} | {description} | High/Medium/Low | ... ## Key Metrics Extracted {All measurable numbers found in the source} Format: `{value}` — {context} — Source: {section/page/git} Examples: - `1,200 commits` over 7 months — Source: "acceleration" section - `-97% traffic` after SSE migration — Source: CHANGELOG v1.1.0 If none → "No verifiable metrics found (Concept mode)" ## Narrative Potential {3-5 sentences on the strengths and possible narrative angles. What makes this talk potentially strong. What might be missing.} ## Gaps Identified - [ ] {gap 1} — {how to fill it} - [ ] {gap 2} — {how to fill it} If no obvious gaps → "No major gaps identified." ## Recommendations for next stages - **Research**: {recommended / not applicable (Concept mode)} — {why} - **Concepts**: {priority themes to explore} - **Position**: {angles already visible from the source material} --- *Generated by talk-stage1-extract — {date}* *Source: {source path}*
Metric Extraction Rules
- Do not round without indicating it
- Always include the metric's source
- If two sources contradict → flag both, do not pick one
- No invented metrics to fill gaps
- Use
format for evolutions{before} → {after}
Anti-patterns
- Vague summary ("This text is about AI...")
- Omitting metrics — even approximate ones with their source
- Hiding gaps — naming them is better than pretending they don't exist
- Changing the detected type without justification
- Inventing a narrative arc not present in the source
Validation Checklist
- Source type detected and justified
- Narrative arc in 3-5 clear sentences
- All measurable metrics extracted with their source
- Main themes listed (3-7 max)
- Gaps explicitly identified
- File saved to
talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-summary.md
Tips
- Run this before the orchestrator if you want to verify the source material is usable
- The summary is the foundation — every downstream stage reads it
- Hybrid sources (part REX, part Concept) are fine — name both components clearly
Related
- Stage 2: Research — git archaeology (REX mode)
- Stage 3: Concepts — reads this summary
- Orchestrator — runs all stages in sequence