GAAI-framework delivery-readiness-audit
Spot-check AC internal consistency and scan for pending revisions on delivery-ready stories. Activated by `/gaai-status --audit` as Section 5. Complements the standard status checks with depth checks that standard status skips for speed.
git clone https://github.com/Fr-e-d/GAAI-framework
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/Fr-e-d/GAAI-framework "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/.gaai/core/skills/cross/delivery-readiness-audit" ~/.claude/skills/fr-e-d-gaai-framework-delivery-readiness-audit && rm -rf "$T"
.gaai/core/skills/cross/delivery-readiness-audit/SKILL.mdDelivery Readiness Audit
Purpose / When to Activate
Activate via
/gaai-status --audit. This skill runs after the standard status sections (1–4) have already identified delivery-ready stories, memory staleness, and framework health.
This skill adds two depth checks that standard status skips for speed:
- AC internal consistency — catches missing columns, undeclared endpoints, broken cross-references within a story
- Pending revisions — catches deferred work flagged in backlog notes but not yet captured as stories
Process
1. AC internal consistency — spot-check READY stories
For each story identified as "ready to deliver" by Section 1:
- Open the story artefact file
- Build an inventory of all resources declared by schema/setup ACs: columns, tables, endpoints, queues, secrets, cron triggers
- Scan all other ACs for resources referenced but not in the inventory
- Flag any reference to a column, endpoint, queue, table, or resource that is not declared elsewhere in the same story
Example of what this catches:
- AC5 uses
for filtering, but AC4 (schema migration) doesn't list that columnorders.cancelled_at - AC7 references
but it's missing from the migrationusers.api_token
Severity: CRITICAL if it would cause the Delivery Agent to produce incomplete code.
2. Pending revisions scan
Scan all backlog item
notes fields for patterns indicating unresolved work:
Patterns to match:
- "will be revised", "pending revision", "needs review"
- "story to generate", "story E0xS0x to generate", "to be created"
- "TODO", "to replace", "to migrate", "needs update"
references followed by a pending action descriptionDEC-
For each match:
- State the backlog item ID, the DEC reference (if any), and the pending action
- Check whether a corresponding story already exists in the backlog
- Flag as IMPORTANT if no story exists yet
3. Delivery verdict
Produce a summary:
- Count of stories truly ready (all deps met + ACs internally consistent)
- Count of issues by severity (CRITICAL / IMPORTANT / MINOR)
- Verdict: READY FOR DELIVERY (0 critical issues) or ISSUES TO RESOLVE FIRST (list critical issues)
For issues safe to correct (missing AC metadata, column alignment), list them as "auto-fixable" in the report. Discovery or the human decides whether to apply fixes — this skill reports only.
Output Format
### Section 5 — Delivery Readiness **5a. AC Consistency (READY stories)** | Story | Issue | Severity | |---|---|---| | E01S03 | AC5 uses `orders.cancelled_at` — missing from AC4 migration | CRITICAL | Verdict: PASS | N issues found **5b. Pending Revisions** | Backlog Item | DEC | Pending Action | Story Exists? | |---|---|---|---| | E02S04 | DEC-{N} | auth middleware refactor to support RBAC | No | **5c. Delivery Verdict** N stories ready. M critical, K important issues. READY FOR DELIVERY | ISSUES TO RESOLVE FIRST
Quality Checks
- Every finding references a specific story ID, AC number, and resource name
- No vague findings ("something might be wrong" is invalid)
- Severity is explicit: CRITICAL (blocks Delivery), IMPORTANT (should fix), MINOR (cosmetic)
- No false positives — only flag cross-references that are genuinely missing
- The report is additive to standard status — never repeats Sections 1–4
Non-Goals
This skill must NOT:
- Repeat checks already done by
Sections 1–4 (staleness, dependency graph, backlog counts)/gaai-status - Fix issues (report only — Discovery or human decides)
- Rewrite artefacts or memory
- Make prioritization decisions about delivery order
If an AC can't survive a cross-reference check, Delivery will produce broken code. Catch it here.