<!-- # COPYRIGHT NOTICE # This file is part of the "Universal Biomedical Skills" project. # Copyright (c) 2026 MD BABU MIA, PhD <md.babu.mia@mssm.edu> # All Rights Reserved. # # This code is proprietary and confidential. # Unauthorized copying of this file, via any medium is strictly prohibited. # # Provenance: Authenticated by MD BABU MIA -->

---

name: 'virtual-lab-agent' description: 'AI-powered virtual laboratory orchestrating multi-agent scientific research teams for autonomous hypothesis generation, experimental design, and validation in biomedical research.' measurable_outcome: Execute skill workflow successfully with valid output within 15 minutes. allowed-tools:

• read_file
• run_shell_command

---

Virtual Lab Agent

The Virtual Lab Agent orchestrates AI-powered virtual scientific research teams consisting of specialized agents (Principal Investigator, Immunologist, Computational Biologist, Machine Learning Specialist) to autonomously conduct biomedical research. Inspired by Stanford's AI Scientist model, it enables hypothesis generation, experimental design, in silico validation, and research synthesis.

When to Use This Skill

• When exploring new research hypotheses autonomously.
• For designing experiments with AI-generated protocols.
• To synthesize literature and generate research directions.
• When validating hypotheses through computational experiments.
• For multi-disciplinary research requiring diverse expertise.

Core Capabilities

1. Multi-Agent Research: Coordinate specialized AI scientists.

2. Hypothesis Generation: Generate testable research hypotheses.

3. Experimental Design: Design in silico and wet lab experiments.

4. Literature Synthesis: Comprehensive research landscape analysis.

5. Computational Validation: Test hypotheses computationally.

6. Research Documentation: Auto-generate papers and reports.

Virtual Lab Team

Agent Role	Expertise	Responsibilities
Principal Investigator	Strategy, oversight	Direction, prioritization
Immunologist	Immune biology	Domain expertise
Computational Biologist	Bioinformatics	Data analysis
Machine Learning Specialist	AI/ML methods	Model development
Scientific Critic	Validation	Quality control

Research Workflow

Phase	Activities	Output
Ideation	Literature review, gap identification	Hypotheses
Planning	Experimental design, resource allocation	Protocol
Execution	Computational experiments	Raw results
Analysis	Statistical analysis, interpretation	Findings
Synthesis	Paper writing, visualization	Publication-ready

Workflow

1. Research Question: Define the scientific question.

2. Team Assembly: Activate relevant specialist agents.

3. Literature Review: Synthesize existing knowledge.

4. Hypothesis Generation: Propose testable hypotheses.

5. Experimental Design: Design validation experiments.

6. Execution: Run computational experiments.

7. Output: Research findings, visualizations, manuscript.

Example Usage

User: "Design a research project to discover nanobody-based therapies against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants."

Agent Action:

python3 Skills/Clinical/Virtual_Lab_Agent/virtual_lab.py \
    --research_question "Design nanobodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike variants" \
    --team_config immunologist,comp_bio,ml_specialist \
    --literature_scope "nanobody,SARS-CoV-2,spike,variants" \
    --experimental_type computational,in_silico \
    --validation_method binding_prediction,md_simulation \
    --output_format research_report \
    --output virtual_lab_results/

Input Parameters

Parameter	Description	Options
Research Question	Core scientific question	Free text
Team Config	Specialist agents needed	List of agents
Literature Scope	Search terms and databases	Keywords
Experimental Type	In silico, computational	Type list
Validation Method	How to test hypotheses	Method list
Output Format	Report, paper, presentation	Format

Output Components

Output	Description	Format
Research Report	Comprehensive findings	.md, .pdf
Hypothesis Ranking	Prioritized hypotheses	.csv
Experimental Protocols	Detailed methods	.json
Computational Results	Simulation outputs	Various
Visualizations	Figures and plots	.png, .svg
Draft Manuscript	Publication-ready text	.docx, .tex
Supplementary Data	Raw data and code	.zip

AI Agent Interactions

Interaction	Agents	Purpose
Debate	PI + Critic	Hypothesis refinement
Design Review	CompBio + ML	Method selection
Interpretation	All	Result synthesis
Quality Control	Critic	Validation

Research Domains Supported

Domain	Example Questions	Key Agents
Drug Discovery	Novel targets, compounds	CompBio, ML
Immunotherapy	CAR-T design, neoantigens	Immunologist
Genomics	Variant interpretation	CompBio, ML
Structural Biology	Protein design	CompBio, ML
Clinical	Biomarker discovery	All

AI/ML Components

Literature Mining:

• PubMed/bioRxiv search
• Entity extraction
• Knowledge graph construction

Hypothesis Generation:

• Gap analysis
• Analogy-based reasoning
• Causal inference

Experimental Design:

• Protocol templates
• Power calculations
• Control selection

Result Interpretation:

• Statistical analysis
• Visualization generation
• Narrative synthesis

Validation Framework

Validation Level	Method	Confidence
Computational	In silico prediction	Moderate
Literature	Existing evidence	Variable
Structural	AlphaFold modeling	High (structure)
Experimental	Wet lab validation	Highest

Stanford AI Scientist Reference

Capability	Implementation	Status
Nanobody Design	SARS-CoV-2 variants	Validated
Binding Prediction	AF-based docking	Active
Lab Validation	Wet lab confirmation	Promising results
Generalization	Other domains	Expanding

Prerequisites

• Python 3.10+
• LLM APIs (Claude, GPT-4)
• Literature databases access
• Computational biology tools
• AlphaFold2/3 installation

Related Skills

• Digital_Twin_Clinical_Agent - Patient simulation
• scFoundation_Model_Agent - Single-cell analysis
• CryoEM_AI_Drug_Design_Agent - Structure-based design
• PROTAC_Design_Agent - Degrader design

Research Quality Control

QC Check	Criterion	Action
Novelty	Not already published	Literature check
Feasibility	Resources available	Resource audit
Reproducibility	Clear methods	Protocol review
Statistical Power	Adequate samples	Power analysis
Bias	Confounders addressed	Critic review

Special Considerations

1. Hallucination Risk: Verify agent claims against literature
2. Citation Accuracy: Double-check all references
3. Experimental Validity: Wet lab confirmation needed
4. Ethical Review: Human subjects require IRB
5. Novelty Assessment: Ensure genuine contribution

Limitations

Limitation	Impact	Mitigation
No Wet Lab	Computational only	Collaborator network
LLM Errors	Factual mistakes	Multi-agent verification
Creativity Bounds	Within training data	Human oversight
Domain Limits	Knowledge cutoffs	Database updates

Future Directions

Enhancement	Timeline	Impact
Lab Automation	Present	Self-driving labs
Real-time Literature	Active	Current knowledge
Multi-modal Data	Emerging	Richer insights
Full Autonomy	Future	End-to-end research

Author

AI Group - Biomedical AI Platform

<!-- AUTHOR_SIGNATURE: 9a7f3c2e-MD-BABU-MIA-2026-MSSM-SECURE -->