Clawfu-skills commission-intelligence
Explain sales commission calculations, resolve discrepancies, and model compensation scenarios for quota planning
git clone https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/revops/commission-intelligence" ~/.claude/skills/guia-matthieu-clawfu-skills-commission-intelligence && rm -rf "$T"
skills/revops/commission-intelligence/SKILL.mdCommission Intelligence
Demystify sales compensation by explaining commission calculations, identifying discrepancies, and modeling payout scenarios.
When to Use This Skill
- Reps questioning commission statements
- Designing or updating comp plans
- Modeling quota and OTE scenarios
- Resolving payout disputes
- Planning territory changes
Methodology Foundation
Based on Alexander Group Sales Compensation Design and WorldatWork Incentive Compensation principles, covering:
- Base + variable structures
- Quota attainment mechanics
- Accelerators and decelerators
- Split and overlay rules
What Claude Does vs What You Decide
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|---|---|
| Explains calculation logic | Final payout approvals |
| Identifies discrepancies | Exception handling |
| Models scenarios | Plan design choices |
| Documents rules clearly | Policy changes |
| Calculates examples | Quota assignments |
What This Skill Does
- Calculation explanation - Break down how commission was computed
- Discrepancy identification - Find calculation errors or data issues
- Scenario modeling - Project earnings under different assumptions
- Plan documentation - Clarify complex comp plan rules
- Dispute resolution - Provide clear audit trail
How to Use
Explain this commission calculation: Rep: [Name] Role: [AE, SDR, etc.] Quota: $[Amount]/[Period] Closed this period: $[Amount] Comp plan rules: - Base: $X - OTE: $X - Variable: X% of base - Commission rate: X% up to quota - Accelerator: X% above quota Deals closed: - [List deals with amounts and close dates] Statement shows: $[Commission Amount] Rep expected: $[Expected Amount]
Instructions
Step 1: Understand the Comp Plan Structure
Common Structures:
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Revenue Commission | % of deal value |
| Quota-Based | % payout based on attainment |
| Tiered | Different rates at different levels |
| Draw | Advance against future commissions |
| MBO | Bonus for specific objectives |
Step 2: Calculate Attainment
Attainment % = (Closed Revenue / Quota) × 100 Example: - Quota: $500,000 - Closed: $450,000 - Attainment: 90%
Step 3: Apply Commission Rules
Standard Calculation:
Base Commission = Closed Revenue × Commission Rate With Quota Thresholds: - Below 50% attainment: 0% payout (common) - 50-100% attainment: Linear payout - Above 100%: Accelerator rate kicks in
Accelerator Example:
Plan: 10% up to quota, 15% above quota Quota: $500K, Closed: $600K Commission: - First $500K × 10% = $50,000 - Next $100K × 15% = $15,000 - Total: $65,000
Step 4: Handle Special Cases
| Scenario | Rule |
|---|---|
| Split deals | Divide credit per agreement |
| Multi-year | Recognize per year or upfront |
| Churn/Clawback | Deduct if customer cancels |
| Ramped quota | Reduced quota for new hires |
| SPIFs | One-time bonus amounts |
Step 5: Reconcile Discrepancies
Common Issues:
| Issue | Cause | Resolution |
|---|---|---|
| Missing deal | Not in CRM | Add deal, recalculate |
| Wrong amount | Incorrect ACV | Verify contract value |
| Wrong rate | Tier confusion | Check attainment level |
| Split error | Credit allocation | Review split agreement |
| Timing | Revenue recognition | Check close date vs. pay period |
Examples
Example 1: Commission Explanation
Input:
Explain why Sarah's commission is $12,500: Rep: Sarah (AE) Quota: $200,000/quarter Q4 Closed: $175,000 Comp plan: - OTE: $200,000 (50/50 split) - Variable: $100,000/year = $25,000/quarter - At 100% attainment: Full $25K variable - Linear payout from 50-100% - Accelerator: 1.5x above 100% Deals: - Acme Corp: $80,000 (Oct 15) - Beta Inc: $45,000 (Nov 3) - Gamma LLC: $50,000 (Dec 20) Total: $175,000
Output:
## Commission Breakdown: Sarah - Q4 ### Step 1: Verify Closed Revenue | Deal | Amount | Close Date | ✓ | |------|--------|------------|---| | Acme Corp | $80,000 | Oct 15 | ✓ Q4 | | Beta Inc | $45,000 | Nov 3 | ✓ Q4 | | Gamma LLC | $50,000 | Dec 20 | ✓ Q4 | | **Total** | **$175,000** | | ✓ | ### Step 2: Calculate Attainment
Attainment = $175,000 / $200,000 = 87.5%
### Step 3: Apply Commission Formula **Plan Rules:** - 50% threshold: Below 50% = $0 - 50-100%: Linear from $0 to $25,000 - 100%+: 1.5x accelerator **Calculation:**
Sarah is at 87.5% (between 50% and 100%)
Linear formula: Payout = (Attainment - 50%) / 50% × Full Variable Payout = (87.5% - 50%) / 50% × $25,000 Payout = 37.5% / 50% × $25,000 Payout = 75% × $25,000 Payout = $18,750
### ⚠️ Discrepancy Found! **Statement shows**: $12,500 **Calculated**: $18,750 **Difference**: $6,250 underpaid ### Likely Cause If system shows $12,500, it may be calculating:
$12,500 / $25,000 = 50% payout
This would happen if: 1. One deal not credited (Beta Inc $45K?) 2. Wrong formula (% of revenue vs % of variable) 3. Deal attributed to different quarter ### Recommended Action 1. Verify all 3 deals in commission system 2. Check if Beta Inc close date is in Q4 3. Confirm formula is linear 50-100%, not flat rate 4. Escalate to compensation admin with this breakdown
Example 2: Scenario Modeling
Input:
Model commission scenarios for Mike: Current: - Quota: $400,000/quarter - OTE: $240,000 (60/40 split) - Variable: $96,000/year = $24,000/quarter - Rate: 6% of revenue up to quota - Accelerator: 9% above quota Q1 pipeline: - Committed: $320,000 - Best case: $450,000 - Upside: $600,000 What would Mike earn in each scenario?
Output:
## Commission Scenarios: Mike - Q1 ### Plan Summary - Quota: $400,000 - At-quota commission: $24,000 (6% × $400K) - Accelerator: 9% above quota ### Scenario Analysis #### Scenario 1: Commit Only ($320K)
Attainment: 80% Revenue: $320,000
Commission at 6%: $320,000 × 6% = $19,200
Quarterly Variable: $19,200 Annualized: $76,800 vs OTE Variable ($96K): -$19,200
**Status**: Below quota, standard rate applies --- #### Scenario 2: Best Case ($450K)
Attainment: 112.5% Revenue: $450,000
Below quota: $400,000 × 6% = $24,000 Above quota: $50,000 × 9% = $4,500
Total Commission: $28,500
Quarterly Variable: $28,500 vs At-Quota ($24K): +$4,500 (19% bonus)
**Status**: Accelerator kicks in, strong quarter --- #### Scenario 3: Upside ($600K)
Attainment: 150% Revenue: $600,000
Below quota: $400,000 × 6% = $24,000 Above quota: $200,000 × 9% = $18,000
Total Commission: $42,000
Quarterly Variable: $42,000 vs At-Quota ($24K): +$18,000 (75% bonus)
**Status**: Excellent quarter, maximizing accelerator --- ### Summary Table | Scenario | Revenue | Attainment | Commission | vs Plan | |----------|---------|------------|------------|---------| | Commit | $320K | 80% | $19,200 | -$4,800 | | Best Case | $450K | 112% | $28,500 | +$4,500 | | Upside | $600K | 150% | $42,000 | +$18,000 | ### Key Insights 1. **Break-even point**: $400K (100% attainment) 2. **Accelerator value**: Each $10K above quota = $900 extra 3. **Commit gap**: Need $80K more to hit quota 4. **Upside potential**: 75% more commission if pipeline converts ### Recommendations for Mike 1. Focus on moving $80K from Best Case to Commit 2. Push for upside deals - 9% rate is lucrative 3. Prioritize larger deals for accelerator impact
Skill Boundaries
What This Skill Does Well
- Explaining commission math step-by-step
- Identifying calculation discrepancies
- Modeling what-if scenarios
- Documenting plan rules clearly
What This Skill Cannot Do
- Access actual payout systems
- Make policy exceptions
- Override approved calculations
- Handle edge cases without rules
When to Escalate to Human
- Policy exceptions or special approvals
- Historical adjustments requiring audit
- Plan design decisions
- Legal or HR compensation issues
Iteration Guide
Follow-up Prompts
- "What if Mike closes an extra $50K deal?"
- "Show me the break-even point to hit OTE."
- "Compare this plan to a flat 8% rate."
- "Model the impact of increasing Mike's quota by 20%."
Refinement Cycle
- Document plan rules clearly
- Run sample calculations
- Verify against actual statements
- Build exception handling guide
- Create rep-facing FAQ
Checklists & Templates
Commission Dispute Resolution Checklist
- Verify all deals in calculation
- Confirm close dates in pay period
- Check split/overlay credits
- Validate attainment tier
- Review for clawbacks/adjustments
- Compare to plan document
Comp Plan Documentation Template
## [Role] Compensation Plan - [Year] ### Structure - Base Salary: $X - OTE: $X - Variable: $X (X% of OTE) - Pay Period: [Monthly/Quarterly] ### Commission Mechanics - Quota: $X/[period] - Base Rate: X% - Accelerator: X% above quota - Threshold: X% minimum attainment ### Special Rules - Splits: [Policy] - Clawbacks: [Policy] - Ramping: [New hire policy] ### Examples [Include 3 scenarios at 80%, 100%, 120%]
References
- Alexander Group Sales Compensation Design
- WorldatWork Incentive Compensation Handbook
- Salesforce Sales Cloud Commission Documentation
- Xactly Commission Best Practices
Related Skills
- Project commission from forecastpipeline-forecasting
- Prioritize high-commission dealsdeal-risk-scoring
- Set achievable targetsquota-planning
Skill Metadata
- Domain: RevOps
- Complexity: Advanced
- Mode: centaur
- Time to Value: 15-30 min per analysis
- Prerequisites: Comp plan document, deal data