Clawfu-skills deal-risk-scoring
Assess deal health and identify at-risk opportunities using engagement signals, stakeholder mapping, and velocity analysis
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/revops/deal-risk-scoring" ~/.claude/skills/guia-matthieu-clawfu-skills-deal-risk-scoring && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
skills/revops/deal-risk-scoring/SKILL.mdsource content
Deal Risk Scoring
Evaluate individual deal health through multi-signal analysis to prioritize coaching, intervention, and resource allocation.
When to Use This Skill
- Weekly deal reviews and pipeline scrubs
- Before QBRs to identify problem deals
- When deals stall or push close dates
- Prioritizing manager coaching time
- Allocating SE/executive resources
Methodology Foundation
Based on Gong's Deal Intelligence research and Winning by Design's Revenue Architecture, analyzing:
- Engagement velocity (email, meeting frequency)
- Stakeholder breadth (multi-threading)
- Competitive signals
- Timeline alignment
- Champion strength
What Claude Does vs What You Decide
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|---|---|
| Scores deals on risk factors | Which deals to save vs. let go |
| Identifies missing elements | Resource allocation priorities |
| Suggests intervention actions | Executive sponsor assignments |
| Tracks velocity trends | Final stage/probability updates |
| Flags competitive threats | Win strategy adjustments |
What This Skill Does
- Multi-signal analysis - Engagement, stakeholders, timeline, competition
- Risk scoring - Green/Yellow/Red health status with reasons
- Gap identification - Missing stakeholders, stalled stages, unclear next steps
- Action recommendations - Specific interventions to reduce risk
- Trend tracking - Velocity changes over time
How to Use
Assess the risk for this deal: Deal: [Company Name] Value: $X Stage: [Current Stage] Close Date: [Target Date] Days in Stage: X Recent Activity: - [List emails, meetings, calls with dates] Stakeholders: - [Name, Title, Role in deal, Engagement level] Competition: [Known competitors] Champion: [Name and strength assessment]
Instructions
Step 1: Engagement Velocity Score (0-25 points)
| Criteria | Points |
|---|---|
| Meeting in last 7 days | +10 |
| Email response in last 3 days | +5 |
| Multiple contacts engaged | +5 |
| Prospect initiating contact | +5 |
| No activity 14+ days | -15 |
Step 2: Stakeholder Coverage Score (0-25 points)
| Criteria | Points |
|---|---|
| Economic Buyer identified | +10 |
| Champion confirmed | +10 |
| Technical evaluator engaged | +5 |
| Only 1 contact | -10 |
| No C-level access | -5 |
Step 3: Process Alignment Score (0-25 points)
| Criteria | Points |
|---|---|
| Clear next step scheduled | +10 |
| Mutual action plan agreed | +10 |
| Decision timeline confirmed | +5 |
| Close date pushed 2+ times | -15 |
| No defined process | -10 |
Step 4: Competitive Position Score (0-25 points)
| Criteria | Points |
|---|---|
| No competition | +15 |
| Differentiation clear | +10 |
| Incumbent advantage | -10 |
| Price pressure | -5 |
| Unknown competitive status | -5 |
Step 5: Calculate Total Risk Score
| Score | Health | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 75-100 | 🟢 Green | Monitor, standard process |
| 50-74 | 🟡 Yellow | Intervention needed |
| 25-49 | 🟠 Orange | Escalate, major action |
| 0-24 | 🔴 Red | Rescue or disqualify |
Examples
Example 1: At-Risk Enterprise Deal
Input:
Deal: TechCorp Global Value: $250K ARR Stage: 3 - Proposal Close Date: Feb 28 (pushed from Jan 31) Days in Stage: 28 Recent Activity: - Jan 15: Proposal sent to John (Dir of Ops) - Jan 22: Follow-up email (no response) - Jan 29: Called, voicemail - Feb 5: Email asking for update (no response) Stakeholders: - John Smith, Director of Ops, Champion (was engaged) - No other contacts Competition: Competitor X mentioned in discovery Champion: John - went silent
Output:
## Deal Risk Assessment: TechCorp Global ### Overall Score: 28/100 🔴 RED - HIGH RISK ### Score Breakdown | Factor | Score | Issues | |--------|-------|--------| | Engagement | 0/25 | No response in 14+ days | | Stakeholders | 5/25 | Single-threaded, no EB | | Process | 5/25 | Pushed once, no clear next step | | Competition | 18/25 | Competitor known but not blocking | | **Total** | **28/100** | | ### Critical Risks 1. **🔴 Champion Gone Dark** - John hasn't responded in 14 days - Possible: Left company, lost internal support, chose competitor 2. **🔴 Single-Threaded** - No other relationships - If John is out, deal is dead 3. **🟠 No Economic Buyer** - Never met decision maker - John may not have authority to close ### Recommended Actions **This Week:** 1. Research John on LinkedIn - still at company? 2. Find another contact via LinkedIn/referral 3. Send "breakup email" to force response 4. Check if Competitor X is in active eval **If No Response by Friday:** - Move to Stage 2 or Closed-Lost - Free up forecast slot ### Red Flags to Watch - If proposal was forwarded to competitor - If budget was reallocated - If project was deprioritized ### Save Probability: 25% Without new contact access, this deal is likely lost.
Example 2: Healthy Deal Review
Input:
Deal: GrowthCo Inc Value: $85K ARR Stage: 4 - Negotiation Close Date: Feb 15 Days in Stage: 7 Recent Activity: - Feb 1: Demo to full team (8 attendees) - Feb 3: Pricing discussion with CFO - Feb 5: Legal reviewing MSA - Feb 7: Call scheduled for Feb 10 Stakeholders: - Maria Lopez, VP Sales (Champion, highly engaged) - Tom Chen, CFO (Economic Buyer, positive) - Legal team (reviewing contract) - 8 end users attended demo Competition: None identified Champion: Maria - actively selling internally
Output:
## Deal Risk Assessment: GrowthCo Inc ### Overall Score: 88/100 🟢 GREEN - HEALTHY ### Score Breakdown | Factor | Score | Status | |--------|-------|--------| | Engagement | 25/25 | Daily activity, prospect-driven | | Stakeholders | 23/25 | EB + Champion + Users confirmed | | Process | 22/25 | Clear timeline, legal in motion | | Competition | 18/25 | No competition identified | | **Total** | **88/100** | | ### Strengths 1. **✅ Multi-threaded** - Champion, EB, and end users engaged 2. **✅ Process momentum** - Legal reviewing = serious intent 3. **✅ Executive access** - CFO in pricing discussions 4. **✅ Champion active** - Maria driving internally ### Minor Risks 1. **🟡 Legal review** - Could surface unexpected blockers - Mitigation: Pre-review common redlines 2. **🟡 No competition confirmed** - May be unknown - Mitigation: Ask directly in next call ### Recommended Actions **Feb 10 Call Prep:** 1. Prepare redline responses for common legal issues 2. Confirm decision process post-legal 3. Ask: "Is anyone else in consideration?" 4. Get verbal commit from Maria ### Close Probability: 85% Deal is on track. Focus on removing legal friction.
Skill Boundaries
What This Skill Does Well
- Objective risk scoring from available data
- Identifying gaps in deal coverage
- Prioritizing which deals need attention
- Suggesting specific interventions
What This Skill Cannot Do
- Know information not provided (internal politics)
- Predict competitor moves
- Replace relationship judgment
- Guarantee score accuracy with incomplete data
When to Escalate to Human
- Strategic accounts requiring executive judgment
- Deals involving partnerships or M&A
- Unusual contract structures
- Competitive intelligence gathering
Iteration Guide
Follow-up Prompts
- "What's the single most important action for this deal?"
- "Compare risk scores for my top 5 deals."
- "What questions should I ask in the next meeting?"
- "Draft a re-engagement email for the silent champion."
Refinement Cycle
- Initial assessment → Identify top risks
- Take action → Update activity log
- Re-score → Track improvement
- Weekly review → Trend analysis
Checklists & Templates
Deal Health Checklist
- Champion identified and engaged this week
- Economic Buyer met at least once
- Next step scheduled within 7 days
- Competition status known
- Close date validated by prospect
Risk Score Template
## Deal: [Name] | Score: X/100 [Status Emoji] ### Quick Stats - Value: $X | Stage: X | Days: X | Close: [Date] ### Scores | Factor | Score | Key Issue | |--------|-------|-----------| | Engagement | /25 | | | Stakeholders | /25 | | | Process | /25 | | | Competition | /25 | | ### Top 3 Actions 1. 2. 3.
References
- Gong Deal Intelligence Research
- Winning by Design Revenue Architecture
- MEDDPICC Qualification Framework
- Force Management Command of the Message
Related Skills
- Aggregate deal health into forecastpipeline-forecasting
- Deep qualification frameworklead-qualification-meddic
- Post-sale relationship scoringaccount-health
Skill Metadata
- Domain: RevOps
- Complexity: Intermediate
- Mode: centaur
- Time to Value: 10 minutes per deal
- Prerequisites: Deal details, activity history, stakeholder map