Clawfu-skills positioning
Master product positioning using April Dunford's proven 5+1 framework from \"Obviously Awesome\". Transform how customers perceive your product by deliberately setting the right context. Use when: Launching a new product and need to define market position; Current positioning feels \"off\" - customers don't \"get it\"; Facing price resistance or wrong competitor comparisons; Pivoting product to new market or segment; Preparing sales pitch and need positioning foundation
git clone https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/strategy/positioning" ~/.claude/skills/guia-matthieu-clawfu-skills-positioning && rm -rf "$T"
skills/strategy/positioning/SKILL.mdPositioning Expert (April Dunford Method)
Master product positioning using April Dunford's proven 5+1 framework from "Obviously Awesome". Transform how customers perceive your product by deliberately setting the right context.
When to Use This Skill
- Launching a new product and need to define market position
- Current positioning feels "off" - customers don't "get it"
- Facing price resistance or wrong competitor comparisons
- Pivoting product to new market or segment
- Preparing sales pitch and need positioning foundation
- Evaluating "Head-to-Head" vs "Niche" vs "Category Creation" strategies
Methodology Foundation
Source: April Dunford - "Obviously Awesome" (2019) & "Sales Pitch" (2023)
Core Principle: Positioning is context setting. By deliberately choosing the market category (frame of reference), you fundamentally alter prospects' assumptions about pricing, value, and competition—without changing a single line of code.
The Cake vs Muffin Paradigm: The same baked good positioned as "cake" competes with ice cream and pie (dessert), but positioned as "muffin" competes with bagels and yogurt (breakfast). The product hasn't changed—the context has. A "dry cake" becomes a "hearty muffin."
What Claude Does vs What You Decide
"Claude handles the framework. You bring the judgment."
| Claude handles | You provide |
|---|---|
| Applying Dunford's 5+1 framework systematically | Strategic context about YOUR business reality |
| Generating competitive alternatives to consider | Knowledge of what customers ACTUALLY use today |
| Following the 10-step workshop structure | Cross-functional input (Sales, CS, Product POV) |
| Synthesizing into positioning canvas format | Validation with real customers |
| Translating positioning to sales narrative | Final positioning decision and accountability |
Remember: This skill accelerates positioning work. The strategic choices remain yours.
What This Skill Does
- Diagnoses positioning problems - Identifies if issues are positioning vs product
- Applies 5+1 Component Framework - Systematic positioning development
- Guides 10-Step Workshop Process - Cross-functional positioning exercise
- Recommends positioning style - Head-to-Head, Niche, or Category Creation
- Translates to Sales Narrative - 8-step pitch structure
- Creates Positioning Canvas - Single-page strategic document
How to Use
Diagnose Positioning Issues
Analyze if my product has a positioning problem. Here's the situation: [describe symptoms like price objections, customer confusion, wrong comparisons]
Develop New Positioning
Help me position my product using April Dunford's framework. Product: [description] Current customers: [who buys it] Problem: [what problem they have with current positioning]
Choose Positioning Style
Should I go Head-to-Head, Big Fish Small Pond, or Create a New Category for [product]? Help me evaluate each approach.
Build Sales Pitch from Positioning
Convert this positioning into an 8-step sales narrative: [positioning canvas or description]
Instructions
When helping with positioning, follow April Dunford's methodology precisely:
Step 1: Diagnose - Is This a Positioning Problem?
Before developing positioning, confirm the issue is actually positioning-related:
## Positioning Problem Diagnosis **Symptoms of Weak Positioning:** | Symptom | What It Looks Like | Score (1-5) | |---------|-------------------|-------------| | "What is it?" confusion | Prospects ask "So, are you like X?" 15 min into demo | | | Price resistance | "I love it but it's too expensive" (wrong comparison) | | | Feature gap requests | Prospects ask for irrelevant features | | | High churn | Customers leave saying "thought it would do X" | | | Long sales cycles | Takes forever to explain value | | **Diagnosis**: If 3+ symptoms score 3+, this is likely a positioning problem. **Key Insight**: A product can fail in one market category and succeed in another without any R&D—purely by changing the frame of reference.
Step 2: Apply the 5+1 Components Framework
Work through each component in order—they have logical dependencies:
## The 5+1 Positioning Components ### Component 1: Competitive Alternatives **Question**: What would customers do if your solution didn't exist? **Common alternatives:** - Direct competitors (rare - usually not the real threat) - Status quo ("doing nothing", "living with the pain") - Manual processes (Excel, email, pen & paper) - In-house solutions ("script the CTO wrote 5 years ago") **Warning**: Avoid the "Phantom Competitor" fallacy. Don't position against Salesforce if customers are using spreadsheets. **Your alternatives**: 1. ________________________________ 2. ________________________________ 3. ________________________________ --- ### Component 2: Unique Attributes **Question**: What features/capabilities do YOU have that alternatives LACK? **Rules:** - Must compare to alternatives from Component 1 - Must be factual and provable - "Easy to use" doesn't count unless you have data **Your unique attributes**: | Attribute | Why Competitors Don't Have It | |-----------|------------------------------| | | | | | | | | | --- ### Component 3: Value (and Proof) **Question**: What benefit do those attributes enable? **Translation Layer:** - Engineers speak: "10ms latency", "ISO 27001" - Buyers hear: "Don't lose customers at checkout", "Don't get sued" **Value Cluster Template:** | Unique Attribute | → | Value to Customer | Proof | |-----------------|---|-------------------|-------| | [technical feature] | → | [business outcome] | [data/case study] | | | → | | | --- ### Component 4: Target Market Characteristics **Question**: Who cares DISPROPORTIONATELY about this value? **Bad segmentation**: "We target mid-sized banks" **Good segmentation**: "We target mid-sized banks currently undergoing regulatory audit on data privacy" **Situational Triggers**: - What situation makes this value urgent? - What event triggers the buying decision? **Your target**: Companies/people who ________________________________ **Because**: They're experiencing ________________________________ --- ### Component 5: Market Category **Question**: What frame of reference makes your unique attributes look like strengths? **The category dictates:** - Competitive set - Budget category - Buyer expectations **Category options to consider**: | Category Option | Competitive Set | Your Position | |-----------------|-----------------|---------------| | [Category A] | [Competitors] | [Strong/Weak/Irrelevant] | | [Category B] | [Competitors] | [Strong/Weak/Irrelevant] | | [Category C] | [Competitors] | [Strong/Weak/Irrelevant] | **Best category**: Where your unique attributes = must-have features --- ### Component +1: Relevant Trends (Optional) **Question**: What trend makes this solution urgent RIGHT NOW? **Rules:** - Trend must connect to your value pillars - Don't attach to irrelevant trends (cynicism) - Creates urgency, not the position itself **Trend**: ________________________________ **Connection to value**: ________________________________
Step 3: Choose Positioning Style
## Three Positioning Styles ### Style 1: Head-to-Head **The play**: Enter existing market, claim to be the best **When to use**: Market fragmented (no leader) OR leader complacent with obsolete tech **Risk**: HIGH - Fighting the "Gorilla" with more budget and brand **Requirement**: Distinct, quantifiable advantage for majority of market ### Style 2: Big Fish, Small Pond (RECOMMENDED FOR MOST B2B) **The play**: Carve out specific sub-segment of existing market **Example**: "CRM for Investment Banks" instead of "CRM" **When to use**: Default for most B2B startups **Risk**: LOW - Caps TAM but gains dominance, pricing power, low CAC **Requirement**: Features highly specific to niche that generalist would never build ### Style 3: Create a New Game (Category Creation) **The play**: Create category that didn't exist **When to use**: Truly disruptive innovation that defies comparison **Risk**: VERY HIGH - Must educate market or die **Requirement**: Massive marketing resources, long education cycle **Reward**: If successful, become "Category King" (HubSpot, Drift) --- **Decision Framework:** | Factor | Head-to-Head | Big Fish Small Pond | New Category | |--------|--------------|---------------------|--------------| | Market maturity | Mature | Mature | Emerging | | Your resources | High | Low-Medium | Very High | | Differentiation | Better at core | Better for niche | Different paradigm | | Sales cycle | Medium | Short | Long | | Risk | High | Low | Very High |
Step 4: Create Positioning Canvas
## Positioning Canvas **Product**: ________________________________ | Component | Definition | |-----------|------------| | **Competitive Alternatives** | [What customers would use otherwise] | | **Unique Attributes** | [What you have that alternatives lack] | | **Value** | [Benefits those attributes enable] | | **Target Customers** | [Who cares most about that value] | | **Market Category** | [Frame of reference for value] | | **Trend** (optional) | [Why this matters now] | --- **Positioning Statement** (internal use): For [target customers] who [situation/trigger], [product] is a [category] that [key value]. Unlike [alternatives], we [unique differentiation]. --- **One-liner** (external use): [Product] helps [target] achieve [value] through [unique approach].
Step 5: Translate to Sales Narrative (8-Step Pitch)
## Sales Pitch Structure (from Positioning) ### THE SETUP (Market Context) **1. The Insight** Start with tension about customer's world: > "We've noticed that [trend/problem] is affecting [target market]..." **2. The Alternatives** Validate current pain: > "Most teams try to manage this with [alternative 1] or [alternative 2]..." **3. The Perfect World** Define buying criteria BEFORE introducing product: > "In a perfect world, you would be able to [ideal state]..." ### THE FOLLOW-THROUGH (Solution) **4. The Introduction** Now introduce product: > "That's why we built [Product], a [category]..." **5. Differentiated Value** Show how you deliver the perfect world: > "We do this through [unique attribute], which means [value]..." **6. Proof** Social proof, case studies, data: > "For example, [customer] achieved [specific result]..." **7. Objections** Pre-handle resistance: > "You might be wondering about [common objection]. Here's how we handle that..." **8. The Ask** Close for next step: > "The next step would be [specific action]..."
Examples
Example 1: Database → Data Warehouse Pivot
Situation: Startup built a database. Positioned as "Database," prospects asked about SQL, ACID compliance, transaction volume. Product was weak on transactions but incredible at analytics.
Problem: In "Database" context, they were a "bad database" losing to Oracle.
Positioning Pivot:
- Unique attribute: Incredible speed on massive aggregate queries
- Context shift: Repositioned as "Data Warehouse"
- Result: In "Data Warehouse" context, no one expects transaction support. Weakness became irrelevant. Speed became hero feature.
Outcome: Sales cycle collapsed from months to weeks. Pricing power increased.
Example 2: Userlist - Email Tool → SaaS Messaging
Situation: Userlist entered as email tool facing Intercom (expensive) and Mailchimp (not SaaS-specific).
Problem: "We are like Intercom but cheaper" = feature war they couldn't win.
Positioning Analysis:
- Alternatives: Best customers used in-house scripts, not competitors
- Unique attribute: Data model understanding "User" vs "Company" (B2B SaaS necessity)
- Value: "Email automation specifically for B2B SaaS"
Result: Big Fish Small Pond strategy. Became "Customer Messaging for SaaS."
- Premium pricing for SaaS-specific features
- Ignored e-commerce customers (wrong fit)
- Focused roadmap and marketing
Example 3: The Cake vs Muffin
Product: Dense, not very sweet, portable baked good with chocolate.
Positioned as "Cake":
- Competitors: Ice cream, pie, tiramisu
- Expectation: Sweet, frosted, celebratory
- Review: "Dry and boring" → FAIL
Positioned as "Muffin":
- Competitors: Bagel, yogurt, banana
- Expectation: Substantial, portable, not too sweet
- Review: "Hearty and healthy" → SUCCESS
Same product. Different context. Opposite outcomes.
Checklists & Templates
Positioning Workshop Checklist (10 Steps)
## Pre-Workshop - [ ] Identify "Best-Fit" customers (those who "get it" instantly) - [ ] Assemble cross-functional team (Sales, CS, Product, Marketing, CEO) - [ ] CEO committed to attend (required for authority) - [ ] Team aligned on vocabulary and willing to release baggage ## Workshop - [ ] Step 1: List TRUE competitive alternatives (from customer POV) - [ ] Step 2: Isolate unique attributes (factual, provable) - [ ] Step 3: Map attributes to value clusters (So What?) - [ ] Step 4: Determine who cares most (situational triggers) - [ ] Step 5: Test market category options - [ ] Step 6: Layer on relevant trend (if applicable) - [ ] Step 7: Document in Positioning Canvas ## Post-Workshop - [ ] Translate to sales narrative - [ ] Update all marketing materials - [ ] Train sales team on new pitch - [ ] Schedule 6-month review
Positioning Red Flags Checklist
- [ ] "We are the Uber of X" → Brings competitor baggage - [ ] "All-in-one platform" → Diluted, unclear message - [ ] Marketing wrote it without Sales → Will be ignored - [ ] Based on what we WANTED to build, not what we BUILT - [ ] Positioning against competitor customers don't use - [ ] No proof for value claims - [ ] Target market = "Everyone"
Governance: When to Revisit Positioning
## Scheduled Reviews - [ ] Every 6 months: Sanity check ## Event-Driven Triggers - [ ] Major competitor enters market - [ ] Significant product feature released - [ ] External environment shift (new regulation, trend) - [ ] Acquisition or merger - [ ] Entering new geographic market
Skill Boundaries (Frontier Recognition)
This skill excels for:
- B2B products with unclear competitive positioning
- Pivots where existing positioning no longer fits
- New products needing go-to-market framing
- Sales teams losing deals due to "wrong comparison" objections
This skill is NOT ideal for:
- Brand-new categories with no analogous market → Consider category-design skill instead
- Commodity products where positioning = price/features only → Focus on differentiation first
- Consumer products where emotional positioning dominates → Supplement with brand-strategy skill
- Technical implementation of positioning (website, sales deck) → Use sales-pitch-dunford after
Quality Checkpoints
Before accepting the output, verify:
- Competitive alternatives are what customers ACTUALLY use (not just direct competitors)
- Unique attributes are provable and specific (not "easy to use")
- Target segment has a clear situational trigger (not just demographics)
- Market category makes your weaknesses irrelevant
- Positioning statement could NOT be used by a competitor
Iteration Guide
"The first output is a starting point, not a destination."
Recommended Iteration Pattern
| Pass | Focus | Questions to Ask |
|---|---|---|
| 1st | Alternatives | "Are these the REAL alternatives my customers consider?" |
| 2nd | Attributes | "Can I prove these? Would customers agree?" |
| 3rd | Value | "Is this the language customers use to describe the benefit?" |
| 4th | Target | "Is the segment specific enough to build a sales playbook for?" |
Useful Follow-up Prompts
After the first output, try:
- "My customers actually compare us to [X], not [Y]. Redo with that context."
- "The value statement feels generic. Here's what customers say in their own words: [quotes]"
- "Stress-test this positioning against [specific competitor]. Where does it break?"
- "My sales team would object that [objection]. How do we address this in the positioning?"
Learning Curve
| Usage | What You'll Experience |
|---|---|
| 1st use | Full framework walkthrough, discover the 5+1 structure |
| 3rd use | You anticipate the questions, prep better inputs |
| 10th use | Framework becomes second nature, you focus on nuance |
Pro tip: The quality of your positioning output directly correlates with how well you know your best-fit customers. If outputs feel generic, go interview 5 customers first.
References
- Dunford, April. "Obviously Awesome: How to Nail Product Positioning" (2019)
- Dunford, April. "Sales Pitch: How to Craft a Story to Stand Out and Win" (2023)
- April Dunford's website: aprildunford.com
- "Positioning is Context Setting" - April Dunford talks (YouTube, conferences)
Related Skills
- sales-pitch-dunford - Build the 8-step narrative from positioning
- value-proposition-canvas - Strategyzer's VPC for validation
- competitor-analysis - Deep dive on competitive alternatives
- brand-voice-guide - Translate positioning to voice
Skill Metadata
- Mode: cyborg
name: positioning category: strategy subcategory: market-strategy version: 2.0 author: GUIA source_expert: April Dunford source_work: Obviously Awesome, Sales Pitch difficulty: intermediate mode: centaur # Centaur = high-stakes strategic work, human judgment on decisions estimated_value: $15,000 positioning workshop tags: [positioning, strategy, April Dunford, B2B, market-category, sales] created: 2025-01-24 updated: 2026-01-28
This skill is part of the GUIA Premium Marketing Skills Library — the 201 layer that bridges AI basics and technical implementation.