Harness-engineering harness-accessibility

Harness Accessibility

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/Intense-Visions/harness-engineering
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/Intense-Visions/harness-engineering "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/agents/skills/claude-code/harness-accessibility" ~/.claude/skills/intense-visions-harness-engineering-harness-accessibility-b5134a && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: agents/skills/claude-code/harness-accessibility/SKILL.md
source content

Harness Accessibility

WCAG compliance verification and remediation. Scan components for accessibility violations, evaluate severity against design strictness, generate actionable reports, and apply automated fixes for mechanical issues.

When to Use

  • Auditing new or existing UI components for WCAG AA accessibility compliance
  • Before PR merge to catch accessibility regressions in UI changes
  • When
    on_new_feature
    triggers fire and the feature includes UI components
  • When design tokens change (color updates may break contrast compliance)
  • After running harness-design-system to validate the generated palette
  • When
    on_project_init
    triggers fire to establish an accessibility baseline
  • NOT for design token generation or palette selection (use harness-design-system)
  • NOT for visual design review or aesthetic direction (use harness-design, Phase 4)
  • NOT for non-UI code (backend services, CLI tools, data pipelines)

Process

Phase 1: SCAN -- Detect Accessibility Violations

  1. Load design tokens. Read

    design-system/tokens.json
    (if it exists) to identify declared color values and contrast pairs. Token-defined colors are the source of truth -- hardcoded colors in components are themselves a violation.

  2. Read design strictness. Check

    harness.config.json
    for
    design.strictness
    :

    • strict
      -- all findings are errors that block (CI fails, PR cannot merge)
    • standard
      -- warnings are visible, errors block (default behavior)
    • permissive
      -- all findings are informational (nothing blocks, but everything is reported)

2.5. Check for i18n skill overlap. Read

harness.config.json
for
i18n.enabled
:

  • If
    i18n.enabled: true
    , defer
    lang
    and
    dir
    attribute checks to
    harness-i18n
    . Do not scan for missing
    lang
    on
    <html>
    or missing
    dir
    on user-content containers -- those checks are covered by the i18n skill's scan phase with more context (locale-aware, RTL-aware).
  • If
    i18n.enabled
    is false or absent, scan for
    lang
    /
    dir
    as normal (these remain part of the accessibility audit).
  • This deduplication prevents the same finding from appearing in both the accessibility report and the i18n report.
  1. Scan component files. Search all files matching

    .tsx
    ,
    .jsx
    ,
    .vue
    ,
    .svelte
    ,
    .html
    for the following violations:

    Images and media:

    • <img>
      tags without
      alt
      attribute (
      A11Y-001
      )
    • <img>
      tags with empty
      alt=""
      on non-decorative images (
      A11Y-002
      )
    • <video>
      and
      <audio>
      without captions/transcripts (
      A11Y-003
      )

    ARIA and semantics:

    • Interactive elements (
      <button>
      ,
      <a>
      ,
      <input>
      ) without accessible labels (
      A11Y-010
      )
    • Icon-only buttons without
      aria-label
      or visually hidden text (
      A11Y-011
      )
    • Clickable
      <div>
      or
      <span>
      without
      role="button"
      and keyboard handler (
      A11Y-012
      )
    • Missing
      role
      attributes on custom interactive widgets (
      A11Y-013
      )
    • aria-hidden="true"
      on focusable elements (
      A11Y-014
      )

    Heading structure:

    • Non-sequential heading levels (e.g.,
      <h1>
      followed by
      <h3>
      , skipping
      <h2>
      ) (
      A11Y-020
      )
    • Multiple
      <h1>
      elements on a single page/component (
      A11Y-021
      )
    • Empty headings (
      A11Y-022
      )

    Color and contrast:

    • Hardcoded color values not from the token set (
      A11Y-030
      )
    • Inline styles with color/background-color that may fail contrast (
      A11Y-031
      )

    Keyboard navigation:

    • onClick
      handlers without corresponding
      onKeyDown
      /
      onKeyUp
      (
      A11Y-040
      )
    • Missing
      tabIndex
      on custom interactive elements (
      A11Y-041
      )
    • Positive
      tabIndex
      values (disrupts natural tab order) (
      A11Y-042
      )
    • Missing focus indicators (
      :focus
      or
      :focus-visible
      styles) (
      A11Y-043
      )

    Forms:

    • <input>
      ,
      <select>
      ,
      <textarea>
      without associated
      <label>
      or
      aria-label
      (
      A11Y-050
      )
    • Missing
      id
      attributes on form controls (needed for label association) (
      A11Y-051
      )
    • Missing error messages or
      aria-invalid
      on validation states (
      A11Y-052
      )
  2. Load anti-pattern catalogs. Read additional detection rules from

    agents/skills/shared/design-knowledge/
    if available. These catalogs contain industry-specific accessibility patterns (e.g., healthcare forms require higher contrast, fintech requires screen reader-compatible data tables).

  3. Record all findings. Each finding includes:

    • File path
    • Line number (approximate, from Grep output)
    • Violation code (e.g.,
      A11Y-001
      )
    • Element or pattern that triggered the finding
    • Raw evidence (the matching line of code)

Phase 2: EVALUATE -- Assess Severity and Categorize

  1. Assign severity based on

    design.strictness
    :

    • strict
      mode: all violations are
      error
      severity
    • standard
      mode: missing alt, missing labels, contrast failures are
      error
      ; heading order, tabIndex are
      warn
      ; informational patterns are
      info
    • permissive
      mode: contrast failures and missing labels are
      warn
      ; everything else is
      info
  2. Calculate contrast ratios. For every color pair found in scanned code:

    • Extract foreground and background colors (from inline styles, class mappings, or token references)
    • Calculate relative luminance for each color using the WCAG 2.1 formula:
      • L = 0.2126 * R + 0.7152 * G + 0.0722 * B
        (where R, G, B are linearized sRGB values)
    • Calculate contrast ratio:
      (L1 + 0.05) / (L2 + 0.05)
      where L1 is the lighter color
    • Compare against thresholds:
      • Normal text (< 18px regular, < 14px bold): 4.5:1 minimum (WCAG AA)
      • Large text (>= 18px regular, >= 14px bold): 3:1 minimum (WCAG AA)
  3. Cross-reference with design tokens. If

    design-system/tokens.json
    exists:

    • Map hardcoded colors in code to their nearest token equivalents
    • If a token-based color pair fails contrast, flag the token definition (not just the component usage) -- the fix belongs in harness-design-system, not here
    • If a hardcoded color fails contrast, flag both the contrast issue and the non-token usage
  4. Check graph constraints. If a graph exists at

    .harness/graph/
    , use
    DesignConstraintAdapter
    from
    packages/graph/src/constraints/DesignConstraintAdapter.ts
    to:

    • Query for existing
      VIOLATES
      edges (violations already recorded in the graph)
    • Add new
      VIOLATES
      edges for findings from this scan
    • The adapter reads
      design.strictness
      to control which violations produce edges
  5. Categorize findings. Group into categories:

    • Contrast (A11Y-030, A11Y-031): color-related violations
    • ARIA (A11Y-010 through A11Y-014): attribute and role violations
    • Semantics (A11Y-020 through A11Y-022): heading and structure violations
    • Keyboard (A11Y-040 through A11Y-043): navigation and focus violations
    • Forms (A11Y-050 through A11Y-052): form control violations
    • Media (A11Y-001 through A11Y-003): image, video, audio violations

Phase 3: REPORT -- Generate Accessibility Report

  1. Generate summary header:

    Accessibility Report
    ====================
    Scanned:    42 component files
    Findings:   18 total (6 error, 8 warn, 4 info)
    Strictness: standard
    
  2. List findings grouped by category. Each finding follows this format:

    A11Y-001 [error] Missing alt attribute on <img>
      File:      src/components/UserAvatar.tsx
      Line:      24
      Element:   <img src={user.avatarUrl} className="avatar" />
      WCAG:      1.1.1 Non-text Content
      Fix:       Add alt={user.name} or alt="" if decorative
    
    A11Y-031 [error] Contrast ratio 2.8:1 fails WCAG AA (requires 4.5:1)
      File:      src/components/Button.tsx
      Line:      15
      Element:   color: #999 on background: #fff
      WCAG:      1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)
      Fix:       Use color token "neutral.600" (#475569, ratio 4.9:1) instead
    
  3. Provide category summaries with counts and severity breakdown.

  4. List actionable next steps:

    • Errors that can be auto-fixed (Phase 4)
    • Errors that require human judgment
    • Warnings to address in next iteration
    • Token-level issues to escalate to harness-design-system

Phase 4: FIX -- Apply Automated Remediation (Optional)

This phase is optional. It applies fixes only for mechanical issues -- violations with a single, unambiguous correct fix. Subjective issues (color choices, layout decisions, content writing) are never auto-fixed.

  1. Fixable violations:

    • A11Y-001
      : Add
      alt=""
      to
      <img>
      tags that are decorative (inside
      <button>
      ,
      <a>
      , or with
      role="presentation"
      )
    • A11Y-011
      : Add
      aria-label
      to icon-only
      <button>
      elements (using the icon name as label)
    • A11Y-012
      : Add
      role="button"
      and
      tabIndex={0}
      to clickable
      <div>
      elements
    • A11Y-041
      : Add
      tabIndex={0}
      to custom interactive elements missing it
    • A11Y-051
      : Generate
      id
      attributes for form controls and link them to labels
  2. Apply each fix as a minimal, targeted edit. Use the Edit tool. Do not refactor surrounding code. Do not change formatting. The fix should be the smallest possible change that resolves the violation.

  3. Show before/after diff for each fix. Present the exact change to the user. This is a hard gate -- no fix is applied without showing the diff first.

  4. Re-scan after fixes. Run the scan phase again on fixed files to confirm violations are resolved. Report:

    • Fixes applied: N
    • Violations resolved: N
    • Remaining violations (require human judgment): M
  5. Do NOT fix:

    • Color choices (subjective -- escalate to harness-design-system)
    • Content for alt text on meaningful images (requires human judgment about image meaning)
    • Layout and heading structure changes (may affect design intent)
    • Any fix that would change the visual appearance of the component

Harness Integration

  • harness validate
    -- Accessibility findings surface as design constraint violations when
    design.strictness
    is
    strict
    or
    standard
    . Running validate after a scan reflects the current a11y state.
  • harness scan
    -- Refresh the knowledge graph after fixes to update
    VIOLATES
    edges. Ensures impact analysis stays current.
  • DesignConstraintAdapter
    (
    packages/graph/src/constraints/DesignConstraintAdapter.ts
    ) -- Reads
    design.strictness
    from project config to control violation severity. Manages
    VIOLATES
    edges in the graph for design and accessibility constraints.
  • DesignIngestor
    (
    packages/graph/src/ingest/DesignIngestor.ts
    ) -- Provides token data used for contrast checking. The ingestor parses
    tokens.json
    so the accessibility scanner can compare code colors against declared tokens.
  • harness-impact-analysis
    -- When tokens change (palette update, new colors), impact analysis traces affected components. The accessibility skill uses this to determine which components need re-scanning.
  • harness-design-system
    -- Dependency. When contrast failures originate from token definitions (not component code), escalate to harness-design-system to fix at the source.
  • harness-i18n
    deduplication
    -- When
    i18n.enabled: true
    in config,
    lang
    and
    dir
    attribute checks are deferred to the i18n skill. This prevents duplicate findings across the accessibility and i18n reports. When i18n is not enabled, these checks remain part of the accessibility scan.

Success Criteria

  • All scanned component files have findings categorized by severity (
    error
    ,
    warn
    ,
    info
    )
  • Contrast failures detected with correct ratios and WCAG criterion references
  • Missing ARIA attributes flagged with specific file paths and line numbers
  • Non-sequential heading hierarchy violations identified
  • Keyboard navigation gaps (missing handlers, broken tab order) detected
  • Form accessibility issues (missing labels, missing error states) found
  • Report generated with violation codes, WCAG references, and actionable remediation
  • Automated fixes applied without breaking existing functionality or tests
  • harness validate
    reflects accessibility findings at the configured strictness level
  • Token-level contrast issues escalated to harness-design-system (not fixed locally)

Examples

Example: Scanning a React Dashboard Component

Context: A React component

DashboardCard.tsx
with known accessibility issues.

Source file:

// src/components/DashboardCard.tsx
export function DashboardCard({ title, value, icon, onClick }) {
  return (
    <div className="card" onClick={onClick}>
      <img src={icon} />
      <h3>{title}</h3>
      <span style={{ color: '#999', fontSize: '14px' }}>{value}</span>
    </div>
  );
}

SCAN findings:

A11Y-001 [error] Missing alt attribute on <img>
  File:    src/components/DashboardCard.tsx
  Line:    5
  Element: <img src={icon} />
  WCAG:    1.1.1 Non-text Content

A11Y-012 [error] Clickable <div> without role="button" and keyboard handler
  File:    src/components/DashboardCard.tsx
  Line:    4
  Element: <div className="card" onClick={onClick}>
  WCAG:    2.1.1 Keyboard

A11Y-031 [warn] Contrast ratio 2.8:1 for #999 on #fff fails WCAG AA
  File:    src/components/DashboardCard.tsx
  Line:    7
  Element: <span style={{ color: '#999' }}>
  WCAG:    1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)
  Note:    Hardcoded color -- not from token set

A11Y-030 [info] Hardcoded color value not from design token set
  File:    src/components/DashboardCard.tsx
  Line:    7
  Element: color: '#999'

FIX phase (auto-fixable only):

- <img src={icon} />
+ <img src={icon} alt="" />

- <div className="card" onClick={onClick}>
+ <div className="card" role="button" tabIndex={0} onClick={onClick} onKeyDown={(e) => { if (e.key === 'Enter' || e.key === ' ') onClick?.(); }}>

Remaining (requires human judgment):

  • A11Y-031
    : Contrast failure -- fix requires choosing a darker color. Escalate to design tokens or get human input on replacement color.
  • A11Y-001
    : The
    alt=""
    fix assumes decorative. If the icon conveys meaning, human must write descriptive alt text.

Rationalizations to Reject

RationalizationReality
"The contrast ratio is 4.4:1 — that's essentially 4.5:1 and the difference is imperceptible. I'll mark it passing."WCAG AA requires exactly 4.5:1 for normal text. 4.4:1 fails. There is no rounding or visual perception exception in the standard. Flag the failure with the actual ratio and let the user decide how to remediate.
"This
<div onClick>
already has good visual styling — adding
role='button'
and a keyboard handler is unnecessary clutter."
A clickable
<div>
without
role="button"
and
onKeyDown
is inaccessible to keyboard-only users and screen reader users. Visual styling has no bearing on ARIA semantics or keyboard reachability. This is A11Y-012, always flagged.
"The automated fix for this
<img>
alt attribute is obvious — I'll apply it without showing the diff since it's just adding
alt=''
."
Every automated fix must be presented as a before/after diff before being written to disk. This is a hard gate. The correct alt value for non-decorative images requires human judgment, and even
alt=""
makes a semantic claim about decorativeness that must be confirmed.
"I18n is enabled, so I'll skip the
lang
and
dir
attribute checks entirely — harness-i18n will catch them."
Deferral to harness-i18n is conditional on
i18n.enabled: true
in config. If i18n is not configured, these checks remain part of this skill's scan. Always read the config before skipping any check category.
"There are 15 findings in this component — I'll fix the easy ones automatically and leave the rest without reporting them explicitly."All findings must be reported, regardless of whether they are auto-fixable. The report is the primary deliverable of the REPORT phase. Selectively reporting only fixable violations hides the full accessibility debt from the team.

Gates

These are hard stops. Violating any gate means the process has broken down.

  • No component marked "accessible" without passing WCAG AA contrast checks. A passing scan means zero
    error
    -severity contrast violations, not zero findings overall.
  • No automated fix applied without showing the before/after diff. Every fix must be presented to the user with the exact code change before being written to disk.
  • No severity downgrade below what
    design.strictness
    config specifies.
    If the project is in
    strict
    mode, a missing alt attribute is an error. The scanner does not get to decide it is a warning.
  • The scan phase must complete before evaluate. No partial evaluations on incomplete scan results. All files must be scanned before severity assignment begins.
  • No fixes that change visual appearance. Automated fixes are structural (adding attributes, roles, handlers). If a fix would visibly change the rendered output, it requires human approval.

Escalation

  • When contrast ratio is borderline (4.5:1 to 5:1): Flag for human review rather than auto-passing. Report: "Contrast ratio 4.6:1 technically passes WCAG AA but is borderline. Consider using a higher-contrast alternative for better readability."
  • When a component has more than 10 findings: Suggest architectural refactoring rather than piecemeal fixes. The component likely has systemic accessibility issues that individual fixes will not adequately address. Recommend: "This component has 14 accessibility findings. Consider refactoring to use accessible base components rather than fixing each issue individually."
  • When design tokens themselves have contrast failures: Do not fix at the usage site. Escalate to harness-design-system: "Token pair primary-500 on neutral-50 has contrast ratio 3.2:1. This must be fixed in design-system/tokens.json, not in individual components. Run harness-design-system to update the palette."
  • When automated fix would change visual appearance: Require explicit human approval. Present the fix with a note: "This fix changes the rendered output. The current <div> will become keyboard-focusable with a visible focus ring. Approve this change?"
  • When
    design.strictness
    is not configured:
    Default to
    standard
    mode. Report: "No design.strictness found in harness.config.json. Using 'standard' (warnings visible, errors block). Set design.strictness in config to customize."
  • After 3 failed attempts to resolve a contrast issue: The color pair may be fundamentally incompatible. Suggest: "Consider using a different color combination. The current pair cannot achieve WCAG AA compliance without changing one of the colors significantly."