git clone https://github.com/Intense-Visions/harness-engineering
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/Intense-Visions/harness-engineering "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/agents/skills/claude-code/harness-design" ~/.claude/skills/intense-visions-harness-engineering-harness-design && rm -rf "$T"
agents/skills/claude-code/harness-design/SKILL.mdHarness Design
Aesthetic direction workflow. Capture design intent, generate DESIGN.md with anti-patterns and platform notes, review components against aesthetic guidelines, and enforce design constraints at configurable strictness levels.
When to Use
- Establishing aesthetic direction for a new or existing project (style, tone, differentiator)
- When
triggers fire and the feature has design scope requiring aesthetic guidanceon_new_feature - Reviewing existing components against declared design intent and anti-patterns
- Enforcing design constraints via the knowledge graph with configurable strictness
- Generating or updating
with aesthetic direction, anti-patterns, and platform notesdesign-system/DESIGN.md - NOT for design token generation or palette selection (use harness-design-system)
- NOT for accessibility auditing or WCAG compliance (use harness-accessibility)
- NOT for platform-specific token implementation into CSS/Tailwind/etc. (use harness-design-web/mobile, Phase 5)
Process
Phase 1: INTENT -- Capture Aesthetic Intent
-
Read existing design artifacts. Search for:
-- existing aesthetic direction documentation (from harness-design-system output)design-system/DESIGN.md
-- existing W3C DTCG tokens (palette, typography, spacing defined by harness-design-system)design-system/tokens.json
-- project configuration for design settingsharness.config.json
-
Check harness configuration. Read
for:harness.config.json
-- enforcement level (design.strictness
,strict
,standard
). If not set, default topermissive
.standard
-- which platforms are enabled (web, mobile)design.platforms
-- path to design intent doc (default:design.aestheticIntent
)design-system/DESIGN.md
-
Load industry profile. If an industry is specified (via CLI
arg or config), read the industry profile from--industry
. Available industries include:agents/skills/shared/design-knowledge/industries/{industry}.yaml
,saas
,fintech
,healthcare
,ecommerce
,creative
,emerging-tech
,lifestyle
. The profile provides sector-specific guidance on:services- Recommended visual style and tone
- Industry conventions and user expectations
- Regulatory or cultural considerations
- Common anti-patterns for the sector
-
Capture user intent. Ask the user to define:
- Style: minimal, expressive, corporate, playful, editorial, or custom
- Tone: warm, cool, neutral, bold, muted, or custom
- Key differentiator: what makes this product's visual identity unique
- Anti-patterns: specific design choices to explicitly avoid (e.g., "no gradients on data elements," "no decorative borders on cards")
-
Load shared design knowledge. Read anti-pattern awareness from
:agents/skills/shared/design-knowledge/
-- curated palettes to understand which aesthetic families are availablepalettes/curated.yaml
-- typography pairings to understand which font combinations are recommendedtypography/pairings.yaml- Industry-specific anti-pattern guidance from the loaded industry profile
-
Confirm intent before proceeding. Present a summary of the captured aesthetic intent to the user. This is a hard gate -- no DESIGN.md generation without the user confirming their aesthetic intent.
Phase 2: DIRECTION -- Generate DESIGN.md
-
Generate or update
. The document must contain the following sections:design-system/DESIGN.mdAesthetic Direction:
- Style declaration (the chosen style and what it means for this project)
- Tone description (how the tone manifests in color usage, typography weight, spacing density)
- Key differentiator (the unique visual identity aspect and how it is expressed)
Anti-Patterns:
- Project-specific anti-patterns (from user input in Phase 1)
- Industry-informed anti-patterns (from the loaded industry profile)
- Each anti-pattern includes: name, description, example of what NOT to do, and why it conflicts with the declared intent
Platform Notes:
- Web-specific guidance (CSS strategy, responsive behavior, animation preferences)
- Mobile-specific guidance (touch targets, native component usage, platform conventions)
- Cross-platform consistency rules (which elements must be identical vs. platform-adapted)
Strictness Override:
- Current
level and what it meansdesignStrictness - Instructions for changing strictness in
harness.config.json - Behavior differences per level:
-- all design violations reported aspermissive
(nothing blocks)info
-- anti-pattern and accessibility violations arestandard
, critical violations arewarn
(default)error
-- accessibility violations arestrict
(blocks CI/PR merge), anti-pattern violations areerrorwarn
-
Populate the knowledge graph. If a graph exists at
:.harness/graph/- Create an
node with properties: style, tone, differentiator, strictness level. UseAestheticIntent
fromDesignIngestor
for graph ingestion.packages/graph/src/ingest/DesignIngestor.ts - Create a
edge from the project node to theDECLARES_INTENT
node.AestheticIntent - This enables downstream skills (harness-accessibility, harness-impact-analysis) to query the declared design intent.
- Create an
-
Run harness validate. After generating DESIGN.md, verify the project still passes all constraints. The new file must not break existing validations.
Phase 3: REVIEW -- Review Components Against Design Intent
-
Scan for anti-pattern violations. Use Grep to search the codebase for patterns that match declared anti-patterns:
- Hardcoded color values not present in
(suggests off-brand color usage)design-system/tokens.json - Font families flagged as anti-patterns in the design intent (e.g., decorative fonts in a minimal project)
- Layout patterns on the forbidden list (e.g., excessive drop shadows in a flat design, gradients on data elements)
- CSS properties or values that contradict the declared style (e.g., rounded corners in a sharp-edge design)
- Hardcoded color values not present in
-
Load detection rules from shared design knowledge. Read from
:agents/skills/shared/design-knowledge/
— font combinations, size, weight, and line-height issues that clash with the declared styleanti-patterns/typography.yaml
— hardcoded colors, insufficient contrast, color-only indicators that undermine the declared toneanti-patterns/color.yaml
— spacing inconsistencies, missing touch targets, fixed-width containersanti-patterns/layout.yaml
— missing prefers-reduced-motion, long animations, scroll-jackinganti-patterns/motion.yaml
— industry-specific rules from the loaded industry profileindustries/{industry}.yaml
-
Cross-reference with graph constraints. If a graph exists at
:.harness/graph/- Query for existing
edges usingVIOLATES_DESIGN
fromDesignConstraintAdapterpackages/graph/src/constraints/DesignConstraintAdapter.ts - Compare current findings against previously recorded violations
- Identify new violations and resolved violations
- Query for existing
-
Assign severity based on
:designStrictness
-- all findings arepermissive
severityinfo
-- anti-pattern violations and accessibility-related findings arestandard
, critical design constraint violations arewarnerror
-- accessibility violations arestrict
(blocks), anti-pattern violations areerrorwarn
-
Report findings. Present each finding with:
- File path and line number
- Violation description and which anti-pattern or design constraint it violates
- Severity level (based on current strictness)
- Suggested remediation
Phase 4: ENFORCE -- Surface and Record Violations
-
Create constraint nodes in the graph. For each violated design rule, if a graph exists at
:.harness/graph/- Create a
node for the rule being violated (if one does not already exist)DesignConstraint - Create a
edge from the violating component to theVIOLATES_DESIGN
nodeDesignConstraint - Use
fromDesignConstraintAdapter
to manage constraint creation and violation recordingpackages/graph/src/constraints/DesignConstraintAdapter.ts
- Create a
-
Format violation output. Each violation follows a numbered format:
DESIGN-001 [warn] Anti-pattern: gradient used on data visualization element File: src/components/Chart.tsx Line: 42 Constraint: No gradients on data elements Intent: Style "minimal" prohibits decorative effects on informational components Fix: Replace linear-gradient with solid color from token "neutral.100" DESIGN-002 [error] Off-brand color: hardcoded #ff6b35 not in token set File: src/components/Alert.tsx Line: 18 Constraint: All colors must reference design tokens Intent: Tone "cool" conflicts with warm orange accent Fix: Use token "semantic.warning" (#f59e0b) or add color to tokens.json via harness-design-system DESIGN-003 [info] Typography: decorative font "Playfair Display" used in component File: src/components/Hero.tsx Line: 8 Constraint: Heading font must match declared typography pairing Intent: Style "minimal" uses Inter for all headings Fix: Replace with token "typography.heading.fontFamily" -
Control severity by
:designStrictness
-- all violations output aspermissive
(DESIGN-001 [info], DESIGN-002 [info], etc.)info
-- anti-patterns and a11y =standard
, off-brand tokens =warn
(default)error
-- a11y violations =strict
(blocks CI), anti-patterns =error
, off-brand tokens =warnerror
-
Run harness validate. After recording violations in the graph, run validation to ensure the enforcement pass is consistent with the project state.
Harness Integration
-- Run after generating DESIGN.md and after enforcement passes. Design violations surface as constraint violations at the configured strictness level.harness validate
-- Run after changes to refresh the knowledge graph. Updated graph enables accurate violation detection and impact analysis.harness scan
(DesignIngestor
) -- Parsespackages/graph/src/ingest/DesignIngestor.ts
andtokens.json
to create graph nodes representing the design system. CreatesDESIGN.md
nodes andAestheticIntent
edges during the DIRECTION phase.DECLARES_INTENT
(DesignConstraintAdapter
) -- Managespackages/graph/src/constraints/DesignConstraintAdapter.ts
nodes andDesignConstraint
edges in the graph. ReadsVIOLATES_DESIGN
to control violation severity. Used during REVIEW and ENFORCE phases.design.strictness
Graph naming convention: This skill uses PascalCase for node types (
AestheticIntent, DesignToken, DesignConstraint) and UPPER_SNAKE for edge types (DECLARES_INTENT, VIOLATES_DESIGN, USES_TOKEN, PLATFORM_BINDING) as conceptual labels. The graph schema registers these as snake_case identifiers (aesthetic_intent, design_token, design_constraint, declares_intent, violates_design, uses_token, platform_binding). The adapter classes (DesignIngestor, DesignConstraintAdapter) handle the mapping — always use the adapters rather than constructing graph queries with raw type names.
-- Dependency. This skill reads tokens and design intent generated by harness-design-system. Token-level issues (palette changes, new colors) are resolved by running harness-design-system, not this skill.harness-design-system
-- When design tokens change, impact analysis traces which components consume affected tokens. Use this to determine which components need re-review after token updates.harness-impact-analysis
Success Criteria
exists with all required sections: Aesthetic Direction, Anti-Patterns, Platform Notes, Strictness Overridedesign-system/DESIGN.md- Anti-patterns are detected in the codebase and reported with file paths, line numbers, and severity
configuration is read fromdesignStrictness
and respected in all severity assignmentsharness.config.json
node created in the knowledge graph with style, tone, differentiator, and strictness propertiesAestheticIntent
edge connects the project to the aesthetic intent nodeDECLARES_INTENT
nodes created for each violated design ruleDesignConstraint
edges connect violating components to their constraint nodesVIOLATES_DESIGN- Violations output in numbered format (DESIGN-001, DESIGN-002, etc.) with severity matching strictness level
passes after DESIGN.md generation and enforcementharness validate- User confirmed aesthetic intent before DESIGN.md generation (hard gate)
Examples
Example: SaaS Analytics Dashboard Aesthetic Direction
Context: A SaaS analytics dashboard project. Industry:
saas. Design tokens already generated by harness-design-system. No existing DESIGN.md aesthetic direction.
INTENT capture:
Industry profile: Loaded (saas) -- recommends professional, data-focused aesthetic Style: Minimal Tone: Cool, professional Differentiator: Dense information display with generous whitespace between sections Anti-patterns: No gradients on data elements, no decorative borders on cards, no more than 2 font weights per component Strictness: standard (from harness.config.json)
DIRECTION output (DESIGN.md excerpt):
## Aesthetic Direction **Style:** Minimal -- clean lines, flat surfaces, no decorative elements that do not serve an informational purpose. Every visual element must earn its place by conveying data or guiding the user's eye. **Tone:** Cool, professional -- slate and blue palette dominates. Warm colors reserved exclusively for semantic states (warning, error). No warm accents in neutral UI. **Differentiator:** Dense information display with generous whitespace between sections. Components are compact internally but breathe externally. Card padding is tight (12px), but gaps between cards are generous (24px+). ## Anti-Patterns | Pattern | Description | Why It Conflicts | | -------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------ | | Gradients on data elements | linear-gradient on charts, tables, cards | Minimal style: flat surfaces only | | Decorative card borders | border with color on .card elements | Minimal style: borders are structural only | | Excess font weights | More than 2 font-weight values per component | Minimal style: typographic restraint | ## Strictness Override Current level: **standard** To change, update `harness.config.json`: "design": { "strictness": "strict" | "standard" | "permissive" }
REVIEW findings:
Found 3 anti-pattern violations in 2 files: DESIGN-001 [warn] Gradient on data element File: src/components/RevenueChart.tsx:42 Constraint: No gradients on data elements Fix: Replace linear-gradient(#3b82f6, #1d4ed8) with solid token "primary.500" DESIGN-002 [warn] Decorative border on card File: src/components/MetricCard.tsx:15 Constraint: No decorative borders on cards Fix: Remove border-color: #3b82f6, use border-color: transparent or remove border DESIGN-003 [info] Three font weights in one component File: src/components/MetricCard.tsx:8 Constraint: Max 2 font weights per component Fix: Consolidate font-weight values to 400 (body) and 600 (heading) only
Rationalizations to Reject
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "The tokens are already defined, so the aesthetic intent is obvious — I can infer it and skip Phase 1." | Tokens define values, not intent. The style, tone, and differentiator exist in the designer's head, not in a color ramp. DESIGN.md cannot be generated without explicit confirmation. |
| "There are only 3 violations and they're minor — I'll skip recording them in the graph to save time." | Unrecorded violations are invisible to every downstream skill. harness-impact-analysis and harness-accessibility rely on edges existing. Skip graph writes and the enforcement record is permanently incomplete. |
| "The strictness level isn't set in config, so I'll just use strict to be safe." | Defaulting to strict without reading config imposes blocking CI failures the team never agreed to. Always read and default to when absent — not to the most aggressive level. |
| "This anti-pattern is declared, but there are 40+ instances — it would take forever to report them all, so I'll summarize." | The REVIEW phase must report every finding with file path, line number, and severity. Summarizing hides the scope from the team and makes automated tooling miss violations. |
| "DESIGN.md already exists from a previous run, so I can skip Phase 2 and go straight to REVIEW." | An existing DESIGN.md may be outdated or missing sections. The DIRECTION phase must verify all required sections are present and current before the REVIEW phase can rely on them. |
Gates
These are hard stops. Violating any gate means the process has broken down.
- No DESIGN.md generated without the user confirming aesthetic intent. The INTENT phase must end with explicit user confirmation of style, tone, differentiator, and anti-patterns. Do not generate based on assumptions.
- No enforcement without reading tokens from harness-design-system. The REVIEW and ENFORCE phases require
to exist. If tokens have not been generated, instruct the user to run harness-design-system first.design-system/tokens.json - Strictness must be read from configuration, not assumed. Read
fromdesign.strictness
. If the key does not exist, default toharness.config.json
and report the default to the user. Never hardcode a strictness level.standard - No anti-pattern detection without a declared intent. The REVIEW phase requires an existing DESIGN.md with declared anti-patterns. If no intent has been captured, run the INTENT and DIRECTION phases first.
- No graph mutations without validating node types. When creating
,AestheticIntent
, orDesignConstraint
edges, verify the node and edge types are registered in the graph schema before writing.VIOLATES_DESIGN
Escalation
- When the user cannot articulate a style or tone: Suggest industry-based defaults from the loaded industry profile. Present 2-3 options with examples: "Based on the saas industry profile, common styles are: (1) Minimal -- clean, data-focused, (2) Corporate -- structured, trustworthy, (3) Expressive -- colorful, engaging. Which resonates most?"
- When declared anti-patterns conflict with existing code: Present a migration path rather than flagging every instance as a violation. Report: "Found 47 instances of gradients on data elements. Recommend a phased migration: (1) Update new components immediately, (2) Schedule legacy component updates over 3 sprints. Set strictness to 'permissive' during migration to avoid blocking CI."
- When tokens do not exist yet: Do not attempt to infer a token set. Instruct the user: "Design tokens have not been generated. Run harness-design-system first to create
, then re-run harness-design for aesthetic direction."design-system/tokens.json - When strictness level conflicts with team velocity: Explain the tradeoffs: "Strict mode blocks PRs on any design violation. If this is slowing the team, consider 'standard' mode which blocks only on critical violations (off-brand colors, accessibility) and warns on anti-patterns."
- When the knowledge graph is unavailable: Skip graph operations in DIRECTION and ENFORCE phases. Log: "Graph not available at
-- skipping AestheticIntent node creation and violation recording. Run.harness/graph/
later to populate." Continue with file-based operations.harness scan