install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/Intense-Visions/harness-engineering
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/Intense-Visions/harness-engineering "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/agents/skills/claude-code/js-revealing-module-pattern" ~/.claude/skills/intense-visions-harness-engineering-js-revealing-module-pattern && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
agents/skills/claude-code/js-revealing-module-pattern/SKILL.mdsource content
JS Revealing Module Pattern
Define all logic privately and selectively reveal only the public API
When to Use
- You want clear separation between private implementation and public interface
- You need a consistent API where all functions are defined in the same scope
- You are refactoring legacy IIFE-based modules to improve readability
Instructions
- Define all functions and variables in a private closure scope.
- At the end of the module, return an object that maps public names to private implementations.
- Internal functions can call each other freely — only the return object is public.
const counterModule = (() => { let _count = 0; function increment() { _count++; } function decrement() { _count--; } function getCount() { return _count; } function reset() { _count = 0; } // Reveal only the public API return { increment, decrement, getCount }; // Note: reset() is private — not revealed })(); counterModule.increment(); counterModule.increment(); console.log(counterModule.getCount()); // 2
Details
The Revealing Module is a refinement of the Module pattern. The key insight: all code (including private functions) is defined in the same flat scope, which makes it easy to see the full implementation. The final
return statement is the sole arbiter of what is public.
Trade-offs:
- References in the returned object point to the original private function — if a public method is overridden externally, internal calls still use the original
- Hard to extend after creation — you cannot add new public methods to an IIFE-based module
- In modern ESM, just not exporting a function achieves the same result with less boilerplate
When NOT to use:
- In modern codebases using ESM — prefer named exports directly
- When dynamic extension of the module is needed
Source
https://patterns.dev/javascript/revealing-module-pattern
Process
- Read the instructions and examples in this document.
- Apply the patterns to your implementation, adapting to your specific context.
- Verify your implementation against the details and edge cases listed above.
Harness Integration
- Type: knowledge — this skill is a reference document, not a procedural workflow.
- No tools or state — consumed as context by other skills and agents.
Success Criteria
- The patterns described in this document are applied correctly in the implementation.
- Edge cases and anti-patterns listed in this document are avoided.