SciAgent-Skills diffdock
DiffDock is a diffusion-based molecular docking tool that predicts protein-ligand binding poses without requiring a predefined binding site. Use it when the binding site is unknown, when traditional docking fails, or when exploring multiple binding modes. Pipeline: prepare protein (PDB) and ligand (SMILES/SDF) inputs → run DiffDock inference → analyze confidence-ranked poses → visualize in PyMOL or NGLview.
git clone https://github.com/jaechang-hits/SciAgent-Skills
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/jaechang-hits/SciAgent-Skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/structural-biology-drug-discovery/diffdock" ~/.claude/skills/jaechang-hits-sciagent-skills-diffdock && rm -rf "$T"
skills/structural-biology-drug-discovery/diffdock/SKILL.mddiffdock
Overview
DiffDock uses a diffusion generative model to predict protein-ligand binding poses directly from protein structure and ligand SMILES, treating docking as a generative rather than a search problem. Unlike traditional docking tools (AutoDock Vina, Glide), DiffDock does not require a predefined binding site — it samples poses across the full protein surface. It outputs a ranked set of binding poses with associated confidence scores. DiffDock excels at blind docking tasks and produces diverse pose hypotheses, making it valuable for de novo binding site discovery and challenging targets.
When to Use
- Blind docking (unknown binding site): You do not know where on the protein the ligand binds and want to discover candidate binding sites.
- Challenging targets that fail traditional docking: Allosteric sites, flexible regions, or proteins without a co-crystal structure in the target binding site.
- Exploring multiple binding modes: Generating a diverse ensemble of poses to understand conformational flexibility in the binding event.
- Structure-activity relationship (SAR) exploration: Rapidly docking a series of analogs to compare predicted binding modes.
- Fragment screening hypothesis generation: Identifying plausible binding sites for fragment molecules.
- For known binding sites with rigid protein assumptions, AutoDock Vina or GNINA may be faster and equally accurate.
- For large-scale virtual screening (>10,000 compounds), consider GNINA or DiffDock-L (the large-scale version) rather than standard DiffDock.
- Use AutoDock Vina instead when the binding pocket is well-defined and faster throughput is needed for large compound libraries
Prerequisites
- Python packages:
(conda install recommended),diffdock
,rdkit
,torch
,biopython
(visualization)nglview - System: GPU strongly recommended (NVIDIA CUDA); CPU inference is slow (~5-10 min/compound)
- Data requirements: Protein PDB file (cleaned, protonated), ligand as SMILES string or SDF file
- Environment: conda environment with CUDA-compatible PyTorch
# Recommended: clone and install from source git clone https://github.com/gcorso/DiffDock.git cd DiffDock conda create -n diffdock python=3.9 conda activate diffdock pip install torch torchvision --extra-index-url https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu118 pip install -r requirements.txt # Download pretrained model weights python -c "from utils.download import download_pretrained; download_pretrained()"
Workflow
Step 1: Prepare the Protein Structure
from Bio import PDB from Bio.PDB import PDBParser, PDBIO, Select class NonHetSelect(Select): """Remove HETATM records (ligands, water) — keep only protein atoms.""" def accept_residue(self, residue): return residue.id[0] == " " def clean_pdb(input_pdb: str, output_pdb: str): parser = PDBParser(QUIET=True) structure = parser.get_structure("protein", input_pdb) io = PDBIO() io.set_structure(structure) io.save(output_pdb, NonHetSelect()) print(f"Cleaned PDB saved to: {output_pdb}") clean_pdb("raw_protein.pdb", "protein_clean.pdb")
Step 2: Prepare the Ligand Input
from rdkit import Chem from rdkit.Chem import AllChem, SDWriter def smiles_to_sdf(smiles: str, output_sdf: str, n_confs: int = 1): """Convert SMILES to 3D SDF for DiffDock input.""" mol = Chem.MolFromSmiles(smiles) mol = Chem.AddHs(mol) AllChem.EmbedMolecule(mol, AllChem.ETKDGv3()) AllChem.MMFFOptimizeMolecule(mol) writer = SDWriter(output_sdf) writer.write(mol) writer.close() print(f"Ligand SDF written to: {output_sdf}") return mol # Example: ibuprofen smiles = "CC(C)Cc1ccc(cc1)C(C)C(=O)O" mol = smiles_to_sdf(smiles, "ligand.sdf") print(f"Ligand formula: {Chem.rdMolDescriptors.CalcMolFormula(mol)}")
Step 3: Run DiffDock Inference
# Command-line inference (run from the DiffDock directory) python inference.py \ --protein_path protein_clean.pdb \ --ligand "CC(C)Cc1ccc(cc1)C(C)C(=O)O" \ --out_dir results/ \ --inference_steps 20 \ --samples_per_complex 40 \ --batch_size 10 \ --no_final_step_noise
import subprocess def run_diffdock(protein_pdb: str, ligand_smiles: str, out_dir: str, n_samples: int = 40, n_steps: int = 20): cmd = [ "python", "inference.py", "--protein_path", protein_pdb, "--ligand", ligand_smiles, "--out_dir", out_dir, "--inference_steps", str(n_steps), "--samples_per_complex", str(n_samples), "--batch_size", "10", "--no_final_step_noise", ] result = subprocess.run(cmd, capture_output=True, text=True, cwd="DiffDock/") if result.returncode == 0: print(f"DiffDock complete. Results in: {out_dir}") else: print(f"Error: {result.stderr}") return result run_diffdock("protein_clean.pdb", "CC(C)Cc1ccc(cc1)C(C)C(=O)O", "results/")
Step 4: Parse and Rank Confidence Scores
import re from pathlib import Path import pandas as pd def parse_diffdock_results(out_dir: str) -> pd.DataFrame: """Parse DiffDock output SDF files and confidence scores.""" out_path = Path(out_dir) records = [] # DiffDock names output files: rank{N}_confidence{score}.sdf for sdf_file in sorted(out_path.glob("rank*_confidence*.sdf")): name = sdf_file.stem # Extract rank and confidence from filename rank_match = re.search(r"rank(\d+)", name) conf_match = re.search(r"confidence(-?[\d.]+)", name) if rank_match and conf_match: records.append({ "rank": int(rank_match.group(1)), "confidence": float(conf_match.group(1)), "sdf_file": str(sdf_file), }) df = pd.DataFrame(records).sort_values("rank") print(f"Found {len(df)} poses") print(df[["rank", "confidence", "sdf_file"]].head(10)) return df df_results = parse_diffdock_results("results/")
Step 5: Analyze Top Poses — Extract Binding Site Residues
from rdkit import Chem from rdkit.Chem import AllChem from Bio.PDB import PDBParser import numpy as np def get_binding_residues(protein_pdb: str, ligand_sdf: str, cutoff_angstrom: float = 4.0): """Find protein residues within cutoff distance of the top-ranked ligand pose.""" parser = PDBParser(QUIET=True) structure = parser.get_structure("prot", protein_pdb) prot_atoms = [(atom.get_coord(), residue.resname, residue.id[1]) for chain in structure for residue in chain for atom in residue.get_atoms()] mol = Chem.SDMolSupplier(ligand_sdf, removeHs=False)[0] lig_coords = mol.GetConformer().GetPositions() contacts = [] for prot_coord, resname, resnum in prot_atoms: dists = np.linalg.norm(lig_coords - prot_coord, axis=1) if dists.min() <= cutoff_angstrom: contacts.append((resnum, resname)) contacts = sorted(set(contacts)) print(f"Binding site residues within {cutoff_angstrom} A: {contacts[:10]}") return contacts # Use top-ranked pose top_sdf = df_results.loc[df_results.rank == 1, "sdf_file"].iloc[0] contacts = get_binding_residues("protein_clean.pdb", top_sdf)
Step 6: Visualize Poses in NGLview
import nglview as nv from rdkit import Chem # Load protein + top pose in Jupyter notebook view = nv.NGLWidget() view.add_pdbfile("protein_clean.pdb") top_sdf = df_results.loc[df_results.rank == 1, "sdf_file"].iloc[0] view.add_component(top_sdf) view.representations = [ {"type": "cartoon", "params": {"color": "chainindex"}}, {"type": "ball+stick", "params": {"sele": "ligand"}}, ] print(f"Visualizing top pose: confidence={df_results.confidence.iloc[0]:.3f}") view
Key Parameters
| Parameter | Default | Range / Options | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| | – | Number of diffusion reverse steps; more steps = slower but more accurate |
| | – | Number of poses sampled; more = better coverage of binding modes |
| | – | GPU batch size; reduce if OOM error |
| off | flag | Removes noise at last diffusion step; improves pose quality |
| equals | – | Steps to actually run (can be fewer than total) |
| off | flag | Also saves PDB visualization files alongside SDF |
| | – Å | Distance cutoff for defining binding site residues |
Common Recipes
Recipe: Batch Docking of Multiple Ligands
When to use: Dock a library of analogs to the same protein for SAR analysis.
import pandas as pd import subprocess smiles_list = [ ("compound_1", "CC(C)Cc1ccc(cc1)C(C)C(=O)O"), ("compound_2", "CC(C)Cc1ccc(cc1)C(C)C(=O)N"), ("compound_3", "CC(C)Cc1ccc(cc1)C(C)C(=O)OC"), ] results = [] for name, smiles in smiles_list: out = f"results/{name}" cmd = ["python", "inference.py", "--protein_path", "protein_clean.pdb", "--ligand", smiles, "--out_dir", out, "--inference_steps", "20", "--samples_per_complex", "20"] subprocess.run(cmd, cwd="DiffDock/", capture_output=True) # Parse top confidence score df_r = parse_diffdock_results(out) if not df_r.empty: top_conf = df_r.loc[df_r.rank == 1, "confidence"].iloc[0] results.append({"name": name, "smiles": smiles, "top_confidence": top_conf}) df_batch = pd.DataFrame(results).sort_values("top_confidence", ascending=False) df_batch.to_csv("batch_docking_results.csv", index=False) print(df_batch)
Recipe: Filter Poses by Confidence Threshold
When to use: Keep only high-confidence poses for further analysis or visualization.
# Confidence > 0 generally indicates a plausible binding pose # DiffDock confidence scores: higher = more confident; ~0 is marginal; < -1 is poor high_conf = df_results[df_results["confidence"] > 0.0] print(f"High-confidence poses: {len(high_conf)} / {len(df_results)}") print(high_conf[["rank", "confidence", "sdf_file"]])
Recipe: Convert Top Pose to PDBQT for Rescoring with Vina
When to use: Rescore DiffDock poses with AutoDock Vina's energy function.
# Convert SDF to PDBQT using OpenBabel obabel rank1_confidence0.75.sdf -O rank1_ligand.pdbqt obabel protein_clean.pdb -O protein.pdbqt -xr # Rescore (no docking search, just energy evaluation) vina --receptor protein.pdbqt --ligand rank1_ligand.pdbqt \ --score_only --out rank1_rescored.pdbqt
Expected Outputs
— 3D ligand poses ranked by confidence scoreresults/rank{N}_confidence{score}.sdf
DataFrame with rank, confidence score, and file path per posedf_results- Binding site residues list (residue numbers and names within cutoff distance)
- NGLview interactive 3D visualization in Jupyter notebooks
Troubleshooting
| Problem | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Batch size too large for GPU | Reduce to or |
| Empty results directory | Protein PDB parsing failed | Ensure PDB contains only ATOM records; remove HETATM with |
| All confidence scores < -2 | Ligand or protein format issue | Validate SMILES with RDKit; ensure protein is protonated and complete |
| Very slow inference (>30 min) | Running on CPU | GPU is strongly recommended; CUDA environment must be correctly configured |
| Dependency not installed | in the DiffDock conda environment |
| Poses cluster at one site | Low | Increase to – for better site coverage |
| Protein missing residues | Incomplete crystal structure | Use MODELLER or Swiss-Model to fill gaps before docking |
References
- DiffDock GitHub (gcorso/DiffDock) — source code, installation, and pretrained weights
- Corso et al. (2023), ICLR — DiffDock paper — original diffusion docking publication
- DiffDock web server — browser-based inference without local installation
- PatentsView API Documentation — for IP analysis context