Claude-skills rag-architect
Designs and implements production-grade RAG systems by chunking documents, generating embeddings, configuring vector stores, building hybrid search pipelines, applying reranking, and evaluating retrieval quality. Use when building RAG systems, vector databases, or knowledge-grounded AI applications requiring semantic search, document retrieval, context augmentation, similarity search, or embedding-based indexing.
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/Jeffallan/claude-skills
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/Jeffallan/claude-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/rag-architect" ~/.claude/skills/jeffallan-claude-skills-rag-architect-95e259 && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
skills/rag-architect/SKILL.mdsource content
RAG Architect
Core Workflow
- Requirements Analysis — Identify retrieval needs, latency constraints, accuracy requirements, and scale
- Vector Store Design — Select database, schema design, indexing strategy, sharding approach
- Chunking Strategy — Document splitting, overlap, semantic boundaries, metadata enrichment
- Retrieval Pipeline — Embedding selection, query transformation, hybrid search, reranking
- Evaluation & Iteration — Metrics tracking, retrieval debugging, continuous optimization
For each step, validate before moving on (see checkpoints below).
Reference Guide
Load detailed guidance based on context:
| Topic | Reference | Load When |
|---|---|---|
| Vector Databases | | Comparing Pinecone, Weaviate, Chroma, pgvector, Qdrant |
| Embedding Models | | Selecting embeddings, fine-tuning, dimension trade-offs |
| Chunking Strategies | | Document splitting, overlap, semantic chunking |
| Retrieval Optimization | | Hybrid search, reranking, query expansion, filtering |
| RAG Evaluation | | Metrics, evaluation frameworks, debugging retrieval |
Implementation Examples
1. Chunking Documents
from langchain.text_splitter import RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter # Evaluate chunk_size on your domain data — never use 512 blindly splitter = RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter( chunk_size=800, chunk_overlap=100, separators=["\n\n", "\n", ". ", " "], ) chunks = splitter.create_documents( texts=[doc.page_content for doc in raw_docs], metadatas=[{"source": doc.metadata["source"], "timestamp": doc.metadata.get("timestamp")} for doc in raw_docs], )
Checkpoint:
assert all(c.metadata.get("source") for c in chunks), "Missing source metadata"
2. Generating Embeddings & Indexing
from openai import OpenAI import qdrant_client from qdrant_client.models import VectorParams, Distance, PointStruct client = OpenAI() qdrant = qdrant_client.QdrantClient("localhost", port=6333) # Create collection qdrant.recreate_collection( collection_name="knowledge_base", vectors_config=VectorParams(size=1536, distance=Distance.COSINE), ) def embed_chunks(chunks: list[str], model: str = "text-embedding-3-small") -> list[list[float]]: response = client.embeddings.create(input=chunks, model=model) return [r.embedding for r in response.data] # Idempotent upsert with deduplication via deterministic IDs import hashlib, uuid points = [] for i, chunk in enumerate(chunks): doc_id = str(uuid.UUID(hashlib.md5(chunk.page_content.encode()).hexdigest())) embedding = embed_chunks([chunk.page_content])[0] points.append(PointStruct(id=doc_id, vector=embedding, payload=chunk.metadata)) qdrant.upsert(collection_name="knowledge_base", points=points)
Checkpoint:
assert qdrant.count("knowledge_base").count == len(set(p.id for p in points)), "Deduplication failed"
3. Hybrid Search (Vector + BM25)
from qdrant_client.models import Filter, FieldCondition, MatchValue, SparseVector from rank_bm25 import BM25Okapi def hybrid_search(query: str, tenant_id: str, top_k: int = 20) -> list: # Dense retrieval query_embedding = embed_chunks([query])[0] tenant_filter = Filter(must=[FieldCondition(key="tenant_id", match=MatchValue(value=tenant_id))]) dense_results = qdrant.search( collection_name="knowledge_base", query_vector=query_embedding, query_filter=tenant_filter, limit=top_k, ) # Sparse retrieval (BM25) corpus = [r.payload.get("text", "") for r in dense_results] bm25 = BM25Okapi([doc.split() for doc in corpus]) bm25_scores = bm25.get_scores(query.split()) # Reciprocal Rank Fusion ranked = sorted( zip(dense_results, bm25_scores), key=lambda x: 0.6 * x[0].score + 0.4 * x[1], reverse=True, ) return [r for r, _ in ranked[:top_k]]
Checkpoint:
assert len(hybrid_search("test query", tenant_id="demo")) > 0, "Hybrid search returned no results"
4. Reranking Top-K Results
import cohere co = cohere.Client("YOUR_API_KEY") def rerank(query: str, results: list, top_n: int = 5) -> list: docs = [r.payload.get("text", "") for r in results] reranked = co.rerank(query=query, documents=docs, top_n=top_n, model="rerank-english-v3.0") return [results[r.index] for r in reranked.results]
5. Retrieval Evaluation
# Run precision@k and recall@k against a labeled evaluation set # python evaluate.py --metrics precision@10 recall@10 mrr --collection knowledge_base from ragas import evaluate from ragas.metrics import context_precision, context_recall, faithfulness, answer_relevancy from datasets import Dataset eval_dataset = Dataset.from_dict({ "question": questions, "contexts": retrieved_contexts, "answer": generated_answers, "ground_truth": ground_truth_answers, }) results = evaluate(eval_dataset, metrics=[context_precision, context_recall, faithfulness, answer_relevancy]) print(results)
Checkpoint: Target
context_precision >= 0.7 and context_recall >= 0.6 before moving to LLM integration.
Constraints
MUST DO
- Evaluate multiple embedding models on your domain data before committing
- Implement hybrid search (vector + keyword) for production systems
- Add metadata filters for multi-tenant or domain-specific retrieval
- Measure retrieval metrics (precision@k, recall@k, MRR, NDCG)
- Use reranking for top-k results before passing context to LLM
- Implement idempotent ingestion with deduplication (deterministic IDs)
- Monitor retrieval latency and quality over time
- Version embeddings and plan for model migration
MUST NOT DO
- Use default chunk size (512) without evaluation on your domain data
- Skip metadata enrichment (source, timestamp, section)
- Ignore retrieval quality metrics in favor of only LLM output quality
- Store raw documents without preprocessing/cleaning
- Use cosine similarity alone for complex multi-domain retrieval
- Deploy without testing on production-like data volumes
- Forget to handle edge cases (empty results, malformed docs)
- Couple the embedding model tightly to application code
Output Templates
When designing RAG architecture, deliver:
- System architecture diagram (ingestion + retrieval pipelines)
- Vector database selection with trade-off analysis
- Chunking strategy with examples and rationale
- Retrieval pipeline design (query → results flow)
- Evaluation plan with metrics, benchmarks, and pass/fail thresholds