Brandedflow agent-team-debate
Run a structured multi-agent debate (validator + skeptic + builder) and synthesize a decision with clear go/no-go criteria.
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/JenCW/brandedflow
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/JenCW/brandedflow "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/.cursor/skills/agent-team-debate" ~/.claude/skills/jencw-brandedflow-agent-team-debate && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
.cursor/skills/agent-team-debate/SKILL.mdsource content
Agent Team Debate
Use this skill when:
- You need independent opinions before action.
- A process change has risk/tradeoffs.
- A go/no-go decision should be evidence-based.
Inputs
- Decision question (single sentence)
- Scope (files/systems in-bounds)
- Constraints (time, risk, policy)
- Decision threshold (what makes it go/no-go)
Team Roles
— strict correctness/compliance checks.Validator
— stress-tests assumptions and failure modes.Skeptic
— proposes practical execution path and rollback.Builder
Execution Steps
- Freeze the decision question and success criteria.
- Spawn 2-3 sub-agents with non-overlapping prompts.
- Require each agent to return:
- findings ordered by severity
- recommended action
- confidence + unknowns
- Synthesize:
- agreements
- disagreements
- final go/no-go with conditions
- If
, provide exact next actions.go - If
, provide exact blockers and smallest fix set.no-go
Output Format
- Decision question
- Agent verdicts (1-3 lines each)
- Consensus summary
- Final decision:
orGONO-GO - Next actions (numbered)
Rules
- Do not claim consensus if agents disagree on critical blockers.
- Do not hide uncertainty.
- Decision must be tied to concrete evidence (file paths, checks, outputs).