Claude-code-plugins-plus-skills analyzing-test-coverage

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/plugins/testing/test-coverage-analyzer/skills/analyzing-test-coverage" ~/.claude/skills/jeremylongshore-claude-code-plugins-plus-skills-analyzing-test-coverage-bc27f5 && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: plugins/testing/test-coverage-analyzer/skills/analyzing-test-coverage/SKILL.md
source content

Test Coverage Analyzer

Current State

!

ls package.json pyproject.toml Cargo.toml go.mod 2>/dev/null || echo 'No project manifest found'
!
node -v 2>/dev/null || python3 --version 2>/dev/null || echo 'No runtime detected'

Overview

Analyze code coverage metrics to identify untested code paths, dead code, and coverage gaps across line, branch, function, and statement dimensions. Supports Istanbul/nyc (JavaScript/TypeScript), coverage.py (Python), JaCoCo (Java), and Go coverage tools.

Prerequisites

  • Coverage tool installed and configured (Istanbul/nyc, c8, coverage.py, JaCoCo, or
    go test -cover
    )
  • Test suite that can run with coverage instrumentation enabled
  • Coverage threshold targets defined (recommended: 80% lines, 70% branches)
  • Coverage output format set to JSON or LCOV for programmatic analysis
  • Git history available for coverage trend comparison

Instructions

  1. Run the test suite with coverage instrumentation enabled:
    • JavaScript:
      npx jest --coverage --coverageReporters=json-summary,lcov
    • Python:
      pytest --cov=src --cov-report=json --cov-report=term-missing
    • Go:
      go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...
    • Java: Configure JaCoCo Maven/Gradle plugin with XML report output.
  2. Parse the coverage report and extract per-file metrics:
    • Line coverage percentage per file.
    • Branch coverage percentage per file.
    • Function coverage percentage per file.
    • Uncovered line ranges (specific line numbers).
  3. Identify critical coverage gaps by prioritizing:
    • Files with coverage below the threshold (sort ascending by coverage %).
    • Files with high complexity but low coverage (use cyclomatic complexity if available).
    • Recently modified files with decreasing coverage trends.
    • Public API functions and exported modules lacking any tests.
  4. Analyze uncovered branches specifically:
    • Find
      if/else
      blocks where only one branch is tested.
    • Identify
      switch/case
      statements with missing case coverage.
    • Locate error handling paths (
      catch
      ,
      except
      ) never exercised.
    • Check
      ||
      and
      &&
      short-circuit conditions.
  5. Generate a prioritized action plan:
    • List top 10 files needing coverage improvement with specific line ranges.
    • Suggest test scenarios for each uncovered branch.
    • Estimate effort (small/medium/large) for each coverage improvement.
  6. Compare current coverage against the previous commit or baseline:
    • Calculate coverage delta per file.
    • Flag files where coverage decreased.
    • Verify new code added since baseline has adequate coverage.
  7. Write coverage enforcement configuration (coverage thresholds in Jest config,
    .coveragerc
    , or CI checks).

Output

  • Coverage summary report with overall and per-file metrics
  • Prioritized list of uncovered code paths with file:line references
  • Coverage delta report comparing against baseline
  • Suggested test cases for top coverage gaps
  • Coverage threshold configuration file for CI enforcement

Error Handling

ErrorCauseSolution
Coverage report shows 0%Tests ran but coverage instrumentation was not enabledVerify
--coverage
flag is passed; check that source files are not excluded by config
Coverage includes
node_modules
Coverage collection scope too broadAdd
collectCoverageFrom
in Jest config; set
--cov=src
in pytest; exclude vendor dirs
Branch coverage much lower than line coverageConditional logic is only partially testedWrite tests for both truthy and falsy conditions on each branch; focus on edge cases
Coverage drops after refactorNew code added without corresponding testsSet
coverageThreshold
with
global
minimums; add
--changedSince
for incremental checks
Flaky coverage numbers between runsNon-deterministic test execution skipping code pathsSort tests deterministically; run coverage with
--runInBand
for consistent results

Examples

Jest coverage configuration with thresholds:

{
  "jest": {
    "coverageThreshold": {
      "global": {
        "branches": 70,
        "functions": 80,
        "lines": 80,
        "statements": 80
      },
      "src/utils/": {
        "branches": 90,
        "lines": 95
      }
    },
    "collectCoverageFrom": [
      "src/**/*.{ts,tsx}",
      "!src/**/*.d.ts",
      "!src/**/index.ts"
    ]
  }
}

Coverage gap analysis output:

Coverage Gaps (sorted by impact):
1. src/auth/oauth.ts        Lines: 45%  Branches: 30%  [Lines 42-67, 89-103 uncovered]
   Suggestion: Add tests for token refresh failure and expired session handling
2. src/api/middleware.ts     Lines: 62%  Branches: 41%  [Lines 28-35, 71-80 uncovered]
   Suggestion: Test rate limiting edge cases and malformed header handling
3. src/utils/parser.ts       Lines: 71%  Branches: 55%  [Lines 112-130 uncovered]
   Suggestion: Test malformed input, empty string, and encoding edge cases

Resources