Claude-code-plugins-plus-skills groq-cost-tuning
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/plugins/saas-packs/groq-pack/skills/groq-cost-tuning" ~/.claude/skills/jeremylongshore-claude-code-plugins-plus-skills-groq-cost-tuning && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
plugins/saas-packs/groq-pack/skills/groq-cost-tuning/SKILL.mdsource content
Groq Cost Tuning
Overview
Optimize Groq inference costs through smart model routing, token minimization, and caching. Groq pricing is already extremely competitive, but at high volume the savings from routing classification to 8B vs 70B are 12x per request.
Groq Pricing (per million tokens)
| Model | Input | Output |
|---|---|---|
| ~$0.05 | ~$0.08 |
| ~$0.59 | ~$0.79 |
| ~$0.59 | ~$0.99 |
| ~$0.11 | ~$0.34 |
| ~$0.04/hr | — |
Check current pricing at groq.com/pricing.
Instructions
Step 1: Smart Model Routing
import Groq from "groq-sdk"; const groq = new Groq(); // Route to cheapest model that meets quality requirements interface ModelConfig { model: string; inputCostPer1M: number; outputCostPer1M: number; } const ROUTING: Record<string, ModelConfig> = { classification: { model: "llama-3.1-8b-instant", inputCostPer1M: 0.05, outputCostPer1M: 0.08 }, extraction: { model: "llama-3.1-8b-instant", inputCostPer1M: 0.05, outputCostPer1M: 0.08 }, summarization: { model: "llama-3.1-8b-instant", inputCostPer1M: 0.05, outputCostPer1M: 0.08 }, reasoning: { model: "llama-3.3-70b-versatile", inputCostPer1M: 0.59, outputCostPer1M: 0.79 }, codeReview: { model: "llama-3.3-70b-versatile", inputCostPer1M: 0.59, outputCostPer1M: 0.79 }, chat: { model: "llama-3.3-70b-versatile", inputCostPer1M: 0.59, outputCostPer1M: 0.79 }, vision: { model: "meta-llama/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct", inputCostPer1M: 0.11, outputCostPer1M: 0.34 }, }; function getModel(useCase: string): string { return ROUTING[useCase]?.model || "llama-3.1-8b-instant"; } // Classification on 8B: $0.05/M vs 70B: $0.59/M = 12x savings
Step 2: Minimize Tokens Per Request
// COST SAVINGS: Reduce system prompt tokens // Groq charges for BOTH input and output tokens // Verbose system prompt: ~200 tokens ($0.012 per 1000 calls on 70B) const expensive = "You are a highly skilled AI assistant specializing in text classification. When given a piece of text, carefully analyze the sentiment, considering tone, word choice, connotation..."; // Concise system prompt: ~15 tokens ($0.001 per 1000 calls on 70B) const cheap = "Classify sentiment: positive/negative/neutral. One word."; // COST SAVINGS: Limit output tokens async function cheapClassify(text: string): Promise<string> { const result = await groq.chat.completions.create({ model: "llama-3.1-8b-instant", messages: [ { role: "system", content: "Reply with one word: positive, negative, or neutral." }, { role: "user", content: text }, ], max_tokens: 3, // One word = 1-2 tokens temperature: 0, // Deterministic = cacheable }); return result.choices[0].message.content!.trim(); }
Step 3: Batch to Reduce Overhead
// Batch 10 items in one request instead of 10 separate requests // Saves on per-request overhead and reduces RPM usage async function batchClassify(items: string[]): Promise<string[]> { const batchPrompt = items.map((item, i) => `${i + 1}. ${item}`).join("\n"); const result = await groq.chat.completions.create({ model: "llama-3.1-8b-instant", messages: [ { role: "system", content: "Classify each numbered item as positive/negative/neutral. Reply with numbered results only.", }, { role: "user", content: batchPrompt }, ], max_tokens: items.length * 10, temperature: 0, }); // Parse numbered results return result.choices[0].message.content! .split("\n") .map((line) => line.replace(/^\d+\.\s*/, "").trim()) .filter(Boolean); } // 10 items in 1 API call vs 10 API calls = ~90% reduction in overhead
Step 4: Cache Deterministic Requests
import { createHash } from "crypto"; const cache = new Map<string, { result: string; ts: number }>(); const CACHE_TTL = 60 * 60_000; // 1 hour async function cachedCompletion( messages: any[], model: string ): Promise<string> { const key = createHash("md5") .update(JSON.stringify({ messages, model })) .digest("hex"); const cached = cache.get(key); if (cached && Date.now() - cached.ts < CACHE_TTL) { return cached.result; // Zero cost, zero latency } const response = await groq.chat.completions.create({ model, messages, temperature: 0, // Required for cache consistency }); const result = response.choices[0].message.content!; cache.set(key, { result, ts: Date.now() }); return result; }
Step 5: Usage Tracking
interface UsageRecord { timestamp: string; model: string; promptTokens: number; completionTokens: number; estimatedCost: number; } const usageLog: UsageRecord[] = []; function trackUsage(model: string, usage: any): void { const config = Object.values(ROUTING).find((r) => r.model === model) || { inputCostPer1M: 0.10, outputCostPer1M: 0.10 }; usageLog.push({ timestamp: new Date().toISOString(), model, promptTokens: usage.prompt_tokens, completionTokens: usage.completion_tokens, estimatedCost: (usage.prompt_tokens / 1_000_000) * config.inputCostPer1M + (usage.completion_tokens / 1_000_000) * config.outputCostPer1M, }); } function dailyCostReport(): { totalCost: string; byModel: Record<string, string> } { const totalCost = usageLog.reduce((sum, r) => sum + r.estimatedCost, 0); const byModel: Record<string, number> = {}; for (const r of usageLog) { byModel[r.model] = (byModel[r.model] || 0) + r.estimatedCost; } return { totalCost: `$${totalCost.toFixed(4)}`, byModel: Object.fromEntries( Object.entries(byModel).map(([k, v]) => [k, `$${v.toFixed(4)}`]) ), }; }
Step 6: Spending Limits in Console
In Groq Console > Organization > Billing:
- Set monthly spending cap (e.g., $100/month)
- Enable alerts at 50% ($50) and 80% ($80)
- Configure auto-pause when cap is reached
- Review usage dashboard weekly
Check your limits at console.groq.com/settings/limits.
Cost Comparison Example
Processing 100,000 customer messages:
| Strategy | Model | Est. Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Naive (70B, verbose prompts) | 70b-versatile | ~$60 |
| Smart routing (8B for classification) | 8b-instant | ~$5 |
| + Caching (50% hit rate) | 8b-instant | ~$2.50 |
| + Batching (10 per request) | 8b-instant | ~$2.00 |
Error Handling
| Issue | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Costs higher than expected | 70B for simple tasks | Route classification/extraction to 8B |
| Spending cap hit | Budget exhausted | Increase cap or reduce volume |
| Cache not effective | Unique prompts | Normalize prompts before caching |
| Rate limits causing retries | RPM cap hit | Batch requests, spread across time |
Resources
Next Steps
For architecture patterns, see
groq-reference-architecture.