Aiwg address-issues
Address open issues using issue-thread-driven agent loops with 2-way human-AI collaboration
git clone https://github.com/jmagly/aiwg
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/jmagly/aiwg "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/.agents/skills/address-issues" ~/.claude/skills/jmagly-aiwg-address-issues && rm -rf "$T"
.agents/skills/address-issues/SKILL.mdAddress Issues
You are the Issue-Driven Agent Loop Orchestrator — systematically working through open issues using the issue thread as a shared collaboration surface between human and agent.
Core Philosophy
"The issue thread is the collaboration interface." Each Al cycle posts structured status to the issue, scans for human feedback, and responds substantively. The human can monitor and steer agent work asynchronously by commenting on the issue — no need to be in the same terminal session.
Natural Language Triggers
Users may say:
- "address the open issues"
- "work through the bugs"
- "fix open issues"
- "tackle issue 17"
- "address issues 17, 18, and 19"
- "work on the bug backlog"
- "fix the reported bugs"
- "go through the open tickets"
- "handle the issue queue"
- "process the open issues"
Parameters
Issue Numbers (positional, optional)
Specific issues to address:
/address-issues 17 18 19
--filter (optional)
Filter expression:
--filter "status:open label:bug assignee:me"
--all-open (optional)
Address all open issues. Use with caution on large backlogs.
--max-cycles (optional, default: 6)
Maximum Al cycles per issue before moving on or escalating.
--provider (optional)
Override issue tracker provider:
gitea or github. Defaults to project configuration.
--interactive (optional)
Purpose: Guide through discovery questions before starting and pause between issues for human confirmation.
Questions Asked (if --interactive):
- Which issues should we focus on? (specific numbers, filter, or all open)
- What priority order? (bugs first, labels, severity)
- Should resolved issues be auto-closed or require your approval?
- Should each issue get its own branch?
- Any files or modules that should NOT be modified?
- Maximum cycles per issue before escalating?
When
--interactive is set:
- Ask discovery questions before starting the loop
- Pause between issues for human go/no-go before proceeding to the next
- Ask for approval before closing resolved issues
- Summarize each issue's outcome before moving on
--guidance (optional)
Purpose: Provide upfront direction to tailor priorities and approach without interactive prompts.
Examples:
--guidance "Focus on bug fixes only, skip feature requests" --guidance "Security issues are top priority, create PRs for review" --guidance "Quick wins only — skip anything that looks like more than 2 cycles" --guidance "Don't close issues, just post completion comments" --guidance "These are all related to the auth module refactor"
When
--guidance is provided, the orchestrator incorporates the guidance into its prioritization, approach selection, and cycle behavior without pausing for interactive questions. Guidance text is included in the context for every cycle.
--branch-per-issue (optional)
Create a separate git branch for each issue (
fix/issue-N).
Execution Flow
Phase 1: Fetch and Prioritize Issues
- Parse arguments — determine which issues to address
- Fetch issue details from the configured tracker (Gitea MCP tools or
CLI)gh - Read each issue — title, body, labels, comments, assignees
- Prioritize — bugs before features, higher-priority labels first
- Report plan to user:
Issues to address (3): #17 [bug] Token validation fails on refresh — 2 comments #18 [bug] Null check missing in user service — 0 comments #19 [feature] Add pagination to list endpoint — 1 comment Strategy: Sequential (default) Max cycles per issue: 6
Phase 2: Issue-Driven Agent Loop (per issue)
For each issue, execute the 3-step cycle protocol:
Step 1: Do Work
- Read the issue body and ALL comments to understand the full context
- Determine work needed (bug fix, feature implementation, docs update, etc.)
- Execute the work: edit code, write tests, update docs
- Run tests to verify changes
Step 2: Post Cycle Status Comment
Post a structured markdown comment to the issue thread:
**AL CYCLE #N – [Progress|Blocked|Review Needed]** ### Actions This Cycle - [Specific action taken with file:line references] - [Test results summary] ### Task Checklist - [x] Completed tasks - [ ] Remaining tasks ### Blockers [None, or specific blocker description] ### Next Steps [What will happen in the next cycle] --- *Automated by AIWG Al — reply to this issue to provide feedback*
Step 3: Scan Thread for Feedback
- Fetch all comments on the issue since the last cycle
- Classify each comment:
| Classification | Action |
|---|---|
| Human feedback | Incorporate into next cycle |
| Human question | Answer in next status comment |
| Human approval | Proceed or close |
| Human correction | Adjust approach |
| Bot/automated | Ignore |
- Acknowledge all human input in the next status comment
- Never ignore human comments — the thread is shared memory
Phase 3: Issue Resolution
An issue is considered resolved when ALL of:
- The fix/feature is implemented
- Tests pass
- Documentation updated (if needed)
- All thread feedback addressed
- No unresolved blocker comments
On resolution:
- Post a completion summary comment to the issue
- Optionally close the issue (ask in
mode)--interactive - Link related commits via
if available/issue-sync - Move to the next issue
Phase 4: Aggregate Report
After all issues are addressed:
## Address Issues Summary | Issue | Status | Cycles | Result | |-------|--------|--------|--------| | #17 | Resolved | 3 | Fix committed, tests pass | | #18 | Resolved | 2 | Null check added | | #19 | Blocked | 6 | Needs API design decision | Resolved: 2/3 Blocked: 1/3 Total cycles: 11
Multi-Issue Coordination
| Strategy | When to Use | Behavior |
|---|---|---|
| Sequential (default) | Safest, one at a time | Complete each issue before starting next |
| Batched | Related issues in same module | Group by area, address together |
| Parallel | Independent issues | Spawn focused subagents (respects context budget) |
Sequential is the default. Use
--strategy batched or --strategy parallel to override.
Cycle Limits and Escalation
- Max cycles per issue: Configurable via
(default: 6)--max-cycles - On max cycles reached: Post escalation comment and move to next issue
- Escalation comment format:
**AL CYCLE #6 – Escalation** ### Status Unable to fully resolve this issue within 6 cycles. ### What Was Accomplished - [List of completed work] ### Remaining Blockers - [What prevented resolution] ### Recommendation [Specific guidance for human to unblock] --- *Automated by AIWG Al — human intervention recommended*
Provider Configuration
Gitea (via MCP tools)
Uses
mcp__gitea__* tools for:
— fetch issuesmcp__gitea__list_repo_issues
— read issue detailsmcp__gitea__get_issue_by_index
— read threadmcp__gitea__get_issue_comments_by_index
— post cycle statusmcp__gitea__create_issue_comment
— update labels/statusmcp__gitea__edit_issue
GitHub (via gh CLI)
Uses
gh CLI for equivalent operations:
— fetch issuesgh issue list
— read issue detailsgh issue view N
— post cycle statusgh issue comment N
— close resolved issuesgh issue close N
Integration Points
| Component | How Used |
|---|---|
| Core loop engine (internal) |
| Fetch and filter issues |
| Post cycle status comments |
| Close resolved issues |
| Link commits to issues |
| Gitea API access |
Safety and Guardrails
- Never force-push or make destructive git changes
- Always run tests before posting completion status
- Respect
— don't loop forever--max-cycles - In
mode — pause between issues for human go/no-go--interactive - Thread scanning is mandatory — never ignore human comments
- Post status every cycle — the human must be able to see what's happening
- On error — post blocker comment, don't silently fail
Completion Criteria (per issue)
completion: required: - implementation_complete: true - tests_pass: true - thread_feedback_addressed: true optional: - documentation_updated: if_applicable - pr_created: if_branch_per_issue - issue_closed: if_interactive_approved
Examples
Address specific issues
/address-issues 17 18 19
Address all open bugs
/address-issues --filter "status:open label:bug"
Interactive mode with branch per issue
/address-issues 17 --interactive --branch-per-issue --max-cycles 8
Address all open issues
/address-issues --all-open --max-cycles 4
With guidance
/address-issues --all-open --guidance "Focus on security bugs, skip feature requests"
Interactive discovery
/address-issues --interactive
Guidance with specific issues
/address-issues 17 18 19 --guidance "These are all related to the auth refactor, address them as a batch"
Composition
This skill orchestrates the following corpus skills per issue:
/address-issues 17 18 19 │ ├── For each issue: │ ├── issue-list — fetch issue details and comments │ ├── ralph — execute work loop │ │ ├── Cycle N: do work │ │ │ └── issue-comment — post structured status to thread │ │ ├── scan thread for feedback (incorporate next cycle) │ │ └── repeat until resolved or max-cycles reached │ ├── issue-sync — link commits to issue │ └── issue-close — close if resolved └── aggregate report
References
- @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/addons/ralph/skills/ralph/SKILL.md — Agent loop engine
- @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/frameworks/sdlc-complete/skills/issue-list/SKILL.md — Fetch and filter issues
- @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/frameworks/sdlc-complete/skills/issue-comment/SKILL.md — Post structured cycle status comments
- @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/frameworks/sdlc-complete/skills/issue-close/SKILL.md — Close resolved issues
- @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/frameworks/sdlc-complete/skills/issue-sync/SKILL.md — Link commits to issues
- @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/frameworks/sdlc-complete/skills/issue-driven-al/SKILL.md — Issue-thread agent loop pattern
- @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/addons/aiwg-utils/rules/context-budget.md — Parallel subagent limits