Aiwg architecture-evolution
Manage architecture changes with impact analysis, ADR generation, migration planning, and breaking change tracking
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/jmagly/aiwg
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/jmagly/aiwg "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/agentic/code/frameworks/sdlc-complete/skills/architecture-evolution" ~/.claude/skills/jmagly-aiwg-architecture-evolution-aa43cf && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
agentic/code/frameworks/sdlc-complete/skills/architecture-evolution/SKILL.mdsource content
architecture-evolution
Manage architecture changes with impact analysis, ADR generation, and migration planning.
Triggers
Alternate expressions and non-obvious activations (primary phrases are matched automatically from the skill description):
- "ADR" → Architecture Decision Record creation
- "C4 model" → architecture diagram update
- "architecture drift" → deviation from baseline
Purpose
This skill manages controlled architecture evolution by:
- Analyzing impact of proposed changes
- Generating Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)
- Planning migration paths
- Tracking breaking changes
- Coordinating cross-team dependencies
- Maintaining architecture health
Behavior
When triggered, this skill:
-
Identifies change scope:
- Parse proposed change
- Map affected components
- Identify stakeholders
- Classify change type
-
Performs impact analysis:
- Direct dependencies
- Transitive dependencies
- Data migration needs
- API compatibility
- Performance implications
-
Generates documentation:
- Create or update ADR
- Update component diagrams
- Document migration path
- Update API contracts
-
Plans migration:
- Phase-by-phase approach
- Rollback strategy
- Feature flags if needed
- Communication plan
-
Coordinates execution:
- Notify affected teams
- Track migration progress
- Validate each phase
- Confirm completion
Change Categories
Component Addition
component_addition: description: Adding new service, module, or component impact_areas: - infrastructure: New deployment resources - networking: New routes, load balancing - security: Access controls, secrets - monitoring: New dashboards, alerts - dependencies: Integration points artifacts: - adr: ADR for new component - diagram: Updated architecture diagram - contract: API specification - runbook: Operational documentation
Component Deprecation
component_deprecation: description: Phasing out existing component impact_areas: - dependents: Who uses this component? - migration: Where do they migrate to? - timeline: How long to deprecate? - data: What happens to stored data? - cleanup: Resource removal plan artifacts: - adr: Deprecation decision record - migration_guide: How to migrate - timeline: Phase-out schedule - communication: Stakeholder notifications
Breaking Change
breaking_change: description: Incompatible change to existing interface impact_areas: - api_consumers: Who calls this API? - contract: What changes in the contract? - versioning: How to version the change? - backward_compat: Can we support both? - rollout: How to phase the rollout? artifacts: - adr: Breaking change decision - migration_guide: Upgrade instructions - changelog: Version history update - deprecation_notice: Timeline for old version
Technology Migration
technology_migration: description: Replacing underlying technology impact_areas: - learning_curve: Team training needs - code_changes: Rewrite scope - data_migration: Data format changes - testing: New test requirements - operations: New ops procedures artifacts: - adr: Technology choice rationale - migration_plan: Step-by-step migration - runbooks: Updated operational docs - training: Team education materials
Impact Analysis Template
# Architecture Impact Analysis **Change**: [Description of proposed change] **Date**: 2025-12-08 **Author**: [Name] **Status**: Under Review ## Change Summary ### What is Changing [Detailed description of the change] ### Why This Change [Business or technical driver] ### Scope - **Type**: Component Addition / Deprecation / Breaking Change / Migration - **Risk Level**: Low / Medium / High / Critical - **Estimated Effort**: [Time estimate] ## Impact Assessment ### Direct Dependencies | Component | Impact | Migration Required | Effort | |-----------|--------|-------------------|--------| | Service A | High | Yes | 2 weeks | | Service B | Medium | Yes | 1 week | | Library X | Low | No | N/A | ### Transitive Dependencies
Proposed Change ├── Service A (direct) │ ├── Service C (transitive) │ └── Service D (transitive) └── Service B (direct) └── Service E (transitive)
Total affected: 5 components ### Data Impact | Data Store | Action | Data Volume | Downtime | |------------|--------|-------------|----------| | PostgreSQL | Schema migration | 10M rows | ~5 min | | Redis | Key format change | 100K keys | None | | S3 | Path restructure | 500GB | None | ### API Impact | API | Change Type | Breaking | Version Strategy | |-----|-------------|----------|------------------| | /users | Response field added | No | Additive | | /orders | Endpoint deprecated | Yes | v1 → v2 | | /auth | Token format | Yes | Dual support 30d | ### Performance Impact | Metric | Current | Expected | Risk | |--------|---------|----------|------| | Latency p99 | 150ms | 180ms | Medium | | Throughput | 1000 rps | 1200 rps | Positive | | Memory | 2GB | 2.5GB | Low | ### Security Impact | Area | Change | Risk | Mitigation | |------|--------|------|------------| | Auth | New token type | Medium | Security review | | Data | New PII field | High | Privacy assessment | | Network | New endpoint | Low | Firewall rules | ## Risk Assessment | Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation | |------|-------------|--------|------------| | Migration failure | Medium | High | Rollback plan | | Performance regression | Low | Medium | Load testing | | Data loss | Low | Critical | Backup + validation | | Extended downtime | Low | High | Blue-green deploy | ## Migration Plan ### Phase 1: Preparation (Week 1) - [ ] Create new infrastructure - [ ] Deploy in shadow mode - [ ] Set up monitoring - [ ] Train ops team ### Phase 2: Gradual Rollout (Week 2-3) - [ ] 10% traffic migration - [ ] Monitor for issues - [ ] 50% traffic migration - [ ] Validate performance ### Phase 3: Full Migration (Week 4) - [ ] 100% traffic migration - [ ] Deprecate old system - [ ] Cleanup resources ### Rollback Plan | Phase | Rollback Time | Data Impact | Procedure | |-------|---------------|-------------|-----------| | Phase 1 | 5 minutes | None | Disable shadow | | Phase 2 | 15 minutes | Sync required | Route traffic back | | Phase 3 | 30 minutes | Manual merge | Full rollback | ## Stakeholders | Role | Name | Notification | Approval | |------|------|--------------|----------| | Architecture | Sarah Chen | Required | Required | | Security | Elena Rodriguez | Required | Required | | Ops/SRE | David Kim | Required | Informed | | Product | James Wilson | Informed | Informed | | Affected Teams | [List] | Required | Informed | ## Decision **Recommendation**: Proceed with Phase 1 **Conditions**: - Security review complete - Load test passes - Stakeholder sign-off ## Related Documents - ADR: .aiwg/architecture/adr-XXX.md - Migration Guide: .aiwg/architecture/migrations/XXX.md - Rollback Procedure: .aiwg/deployment/rollback-XXX.md
ADR Generation
When evolution is approved, generate ADR:
# ADR-XXX: [Title] ## Status Proposed → Accepted → Superseded by ADR-YYY (if applicable) ## Context [What is the issue that we're seeing that is motivating this decision or change?] ## Decision [What is the change that we're proposing and/or doing?] ## Consequences ### Positive - [Benefit 1] - [Benefit 2] ### Negative - [Trade-off 1] - [Trade-off 2] ### Risks - [Risk 1 with mitigation] - [Risk 2 with mitigation] ## Alternatives Considered ### Option A: [Name] [Description and why rejected] ### Option B: [Name] [Description and why rejected] ## Implementation ### Migration Path [High-level migration steps] ### Timeline - Phase 1: [Date] - [Description] - Phase 2: [Date] - [Description] - Phase 3: [Date] - [Description] ### Rollback Strategy [How to undo if needed] ## References - Impact Analysis: [link] - Design Document: [link] - Related ADRs: [links]
Usage Examples
Plan Component Addition
User: "Evolve architecture to add caching layer" Skill executes: 1. Identify change: Add Redis caching 2. Map affected components 3. Analyze impact 4. Generate migration plan Output: "Architecture Evolution: Add Caching Layer Impact Analysis: - Direct dependencies: 3 services - Data stores: 1 new (Redis) - API changes: None - Performance: +40% expected improvement Migration Plan: Phase 1: Deploy Redis cluster (Week 1) Phase 2: Add cache-aside to read paths (Week 2) Phase 3: Enable cache warming (Week 3) Phase 4: Monitor and tune (Week 4) Risk: Medium - Rollback: Disable cache reads, direct DB Generated: - ADR: .aiwg/architecture/adr-023-caching-layer.md - Impact Analysis: .aiwg/architecture/impact/caching-layer.md - Migration Guide: .aiwg/architecture/migrations/add-caching.md"
Handle Breaking Change
User: "Breaking change: new auth token format" Skill analyzes: 1. Identify all token consumers 2. Plan dual-support period 3. Document migration path Output: "Breaking Change Analysis: Auth Token Format Impact: - 5 services consume auth tokens - 2 external API consumers identified - Mobile apps: iOS 3.2+, Android 4.1+ Migration Strategy: 1. Deploy services with dual-token support 2. Issue new tokens, accept both formats 3. Monitor old token usage decline 4. Set deprecation date (30 days) 5. Remove old token support Communication Plan: - Internal teams: Slack + email (immediate) - External consumers: Email + docs (this week) - Deprecation notice: 30 days minimum ADR: .aiwg/architecture/adr-024-token-format.md"
Deprecation Planning
User: "Deprecate legacy order service" Skill executes: 1. Map all dependents 2. Identify migration target 3. Plan phase-out timeline Output: "Deprecation Plan: Legacy Order Service Current Consumers: 8 services Migration Target: Order Service v2 Dependency Migration: | Consumer | Migration Effort | Target Date | |----------|-----------------|-------------| | Cart | 2 weeks | Jan 15 | | Checkout | 3 weeks | Jan 22 | | Reports | 1 week | Jan 10 | | ... | ... | ... | Timeline: - Jan 1: Deprecation notice sent - Jan 31: All consumers migrated - Feb 15: Service decommissioned Data Migration: - 5M orders to migrate - Strategy: Batch migration + sync - Duration: 2 hours (off-peak) ADR: .aiwg/architecture/adr-025-deprecate-order-v1.md Migration Guide: .aiwg/architecture/migrations/order-v1-to-v2.md"
Integration
This skill uses:
: For architectural decisionsdecision-support
: For component topologyproject-awareness
: For tracking ADRsartifact-metadata
Agent Orchestration
agents: analysis: agent: architecture-designer focus: Impact analysis and design security: agent: security-architect focus: Security implications condition: security_relevant == true reliability: agent: reliability-engineer focus: Performance and availability impact migration: agent: deployment-manager focus: Migration planning and execution
Configuration
Change Classification
change_classification: risk_factors: - data_migration: +2 - breaking_api: +3 - cross_team: +1 - production_impact: +2 - security_change: +2 risk_levels: low: 0-2 medium: 3-5 high: 6-8 critical: 9+ approval_requirements: low: team_lead medium: architecture_review high: architecture_board critical: executive_approval
Migration Strategies
migration_strategies: big_bang: use_when: Low risk, small scope downtime: Possible rollback: Full phased: use_when: Medium risk, manageable scope downtime: Minimal rollback: Per-phase blue_green: use_when: High availability required downtime: Near-zero rollback: Traffic switch strangler: use_when: Large legacy migration downtime: None rollback: Route traffic
Output Locations
- Impact analyses:
.aiwg/architecture/impact/ - ADRs:
.aiwg/architecture/adr-*.md - Migration plans:
.aiwg/architecture/migrations/ - Deprecation notices:
.aiwg/architecture/deprecations/
References
- ADR template: templates/analysis-design/adr-template.md
- Impact analysis template: templates/analysis-design/impact-analysis.md
- Migration guide template: templates/deployment/migration-guide.md
- Architecture diagram: .aiwg/architecture/diagrams/