Maestro-orchestrate review-code
Perform a Maestro-style code review with findings ordered by severity and concrete file references
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/josstei/maestro-orchestrate
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/josstei/maestro-orchestrate "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/claude/skills/review-code" ~/.claude/skills/josstei-maestro-orchestrate-review-code && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
claude/skills/review-code/SKILL.mdsource content
Maestro Review Code
Call
get_skill_content with resources: ["architecture"].
Protocol
Before delegating, call
get_skill_content with resources: ["delegation"] and follow the returned methodology.
Workflow
- Determine review scope: explicit user-provided paths, staged changes, or last commit diff
- Delegate to the code-reviewer agent with the diff content and file paths
- Review for correctness, regressions, security, maintainability risk, and missing tests
- Classify findings by severity (Critical, Major, Minor, Suggestion) with concrete file and line references
- Present findings first, ordered by severity; keep the closing summary brief and only after findings
Constraints
- Do not bury findings behind a long overview
- Every finding must reference a specific file and line number -- no speculative issues
- If no findings exist, say so explicitly and note residual testing gaps