Lenny_skills_plus onboarding-new-hires
Design employee onboarding (first 90 days + trajectory). See also: user-onboarding (product UX onboarding).
git clone https://github.com/liqiongyu/lenny_skills_plus
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/liqiongyu/lenny_skills_plus "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/onboarding-new-hires" ~/.claude/skills/liqiongyu-lenny-skills-plus-onboarding-new-hires && rm -rf "$T"
skills/onboarding-new-hires/SKILL.mdOnboarding New Hires
Scope
Covers
- Designing onboarding for a new hire’s first day / week / 30–60–90 days
- Creating a context pack (team operating manual, mental models, decision history) to reduce “hidden curriculum”
- Ensuring belonging + social integration (buddy + “first pair”, introductions, routines)
- Running a structured listening tour and synthesizing what’s learned into a crisp summary
- Aligning on a working agreement (relationship design: expectations, communication, escalation)
- Producing a concrete 30/60/90 plan plus 1-year / 2-year trajectory expectations
When to use
- “Create an onboarding plan for a new PM/engineer/leader joining my team.”
- “Build a 30/60/90 plan and first-week schedule for this hire.”
- “Design a listening tour + stakeholder map + synthesis template for a new leader.”
- “Create a buddy/first-pair plan so they don’t feel alone on day one.”
- “Write a working agreement / relationship design conversation guide for me and my new report.”
When NOT to use
- You need to design product/user onboarding flows or activation funnels (use
— completely different domain)user-onboarding - You need to define the role outcomes or write the job description (use
)writing-job-descriptions - You need to evaluate candidates or decide who to hire (use
and/orconducting-interviews
)evaluating-candidates - You need to run organization-wide culture change or write a culture code (use
— this skill is for per-hire onboarding, not team-wide culture redesign)building-team-culture - You need to design team operating cadence or rituals (use
)team-rituals - You need legal/HR compliance advice (this skill is not legal advice)
Inputs
Minimum required
- Role + level + function (e.g., “Senior PM”, “Founding Designer”, “Eng Manager”)
- Start date + location (remote/hybrid/in-office) + any time zone constraints
- Manager + team context (mission, current priorities, what’s hard right now)
- What “success” means at 30/60/90 days, and at 1 year / 2 years (even if rough)
- Key stakeholders (internal + external) and any known sensitivities/politics to handle carefully
- Constraints: urgency, confidentiality/PII, systems access constraints, onboarding time budget
Missing-info strategy
- Ask up to 5 questions from references/INTAKE.md (3–5 at a time).
- If success metrics aren’t known, propose a draft success definition and label assumptions clearly.
- Do not request secrets. If context is sensitive, ask for redacted or high-level summaries.
Outputs (deliverables)
Produce a New Hire Onboarding Pack in Markdown (in-chat; or as files if requested):
- Onboarding brief (role outcomes, success definition, constraints, risks)
- Preboarding checklist (docs, access, equipment, meetings, comms)
- First-week plan (day 1 + week 1 schedule; introductions; “first pair” plan)
- Context pack outline (team operating manual + mental models + “how decisions get made”)
- Listening tour kit (stakeholder map, schedule, question guide, synthesis table)
- Working agreement (relationship design conversation summary: working style + expectations)
- 30/60/90 + 1y/2y plan (phased objectives, deliverables, check-ins, guardrails)
- 30-day state-of-the-union memo (what I heard, themes, proposed focus, open questions)
- Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always included)
Templates: references/TEMPLATES.md
Expanded guidance: references/WORKFLOW.md
Workflow (7 steps)
1) Intake + role success definition (don’t skip)
- Inputs: user context; references/INTAKE.md.
- Actions: Confirm role, seniority, start date, manager, and constraints. Draft success definitions for 30/60/90 + 1y/2y (or confirm existing ones). Identify onboarding risks (ambiguity, politics, skill gaps, time constraints).
- Outputs: Onboarding brief (draft) + assumptions/unknowns list.
- Checks: You can state “what great looks like” in 5–10 bullets across 30/60/90 + 1y/2y.
2) Build the context pack (reduce hidden curriculum)
- Inputs: existing docs (or none); org norms; key decisions.
- Actions: Create a context pack outline the hire can read pre-day-1: team mission, current strategy, decision history, glossary, key metrics, meeting cadence, “how we work”, and the manager’s/product philosophy and mental models.
- Outputs: Context pack outline + reading list + glossary seeds.
- Checks: A new hire could answer: “What matters here? How are decisions made? Where do I find truth?”
3) Preboarding + day-1 belonging plan
- Inputs: start logistics; access dependencies; people map.
- Actions: Create a preboarding checklist (accounts, equipment, repo/docs access, calendar invites). Design day-1 + week-1 plan that maximizes belonging: assign a buddy and a “first pair”; schedule introductions; ensure meaningful collaborative work in week 1.
- Outputs: Preboarding checklist + first-week plan + buddy/first-pair plan.
- Checks: No “sit alone and read docs” first day; social integration is explicit and timeboxed.
4) Plan the 0–30 day listening tour (diagnose before treat)
- Inputs: stakeholder list; context pack.
- Actions: Build a stakeholder map and a listening tour schedule. Provide a question guide and note template. Emphasize learning: constraints, incentives, pain points, and “what good looks like” from others’ perspectives.
- Outputs: Listening tour kit (stakeholder table, schedule, question guide, notes template).
- Checks: The tour covers all critical interfaces; questions force specifics (examples, trade-offs, metrics).
5) Synthesize learnings → 30-day state-of-the-union
- Inputs: listening notes; artifacts from week 1–4.
- Actions: Synthesize themes, tensions, and opportunities. Write a crisp “state of the union” memo that reflects what was heard, acknowledges trade-offs, and proposes a focus area list (with open questions).
- Outputs: 30-day state-of-the-union memo (draft).
- Checks: Stakeholders feel “heard” and can point to what changed in understanding.
6) Relationship design + 30/60/90 + trajectory plan
- Inputs: manager + hire expectations; constraints; learnings.
- Actions: Run (or prepare) a relationship design conversation and document a working agreement. Finalize a phased plan:
- Days 0–30: learn + map + de-risk
- Days 31–60: align on direction + plan + early delivery
- Days 61–90: execute + systemize + handoffs
- Add 1-year / 2-year expectations, check-in cadence, and guardrails (“what not to do yet”).
- Outputs: Working agreement + 30/60/90 + 1y/2y plan.
- Checks: Objectives are measurable; responsibilities and decision rights are explicit.
7) Quality gate + finalize the pack
- Inputs: full draft pack.
- Actions: Run references/CHECKLISTS.md and score with references/RUBRIC.md. Add Risks / Open questions / Next steps. If important inputs are missing, propose the smallest next action to resolve them (one meeting, one doc, one data pull).
- Outputs: Final New Hire Onboarding Pack.
- Checks: The plan is realistic for the hire’s seniority + context; it contains concrete calendars/docs, not just advice.
Quality gate (required)
- Use references/CHECKLISTS.md and references/RUBRIC.md.
- Always include: Risks, Open questions, Next steps.
Examples
Example 1 (manager onboarding plan): “We’re onboarding a Senior PM starting Feb 5. Create a full onboarding pack: preboarding, first-week plan, listening tour schedule, working agreement prompts, and a 30/60/90 + 1y/2y success plan. We’re remote across PST/EST.”
Expected: a complete pack with calendar-ready steps and role-specific success definitions.
Example 2 (new leader joining): “A new Engineering Manager is joining a team with morale issues. Build a 0–30 listening tour kit and a 30-day state-of-the-union memo outline, plus a cautious 30/60/90 plan that prioritizes trust.”
Expected: stakeholder map + question guide, synthesis template, and guarded plan that avoids premature changes.
Boundary example (generic): “Write a generic onboarding checklist for all roles.” Response: ask for role + context; propose a minimal universal skeleton and require role-specific tailoring before finalizing.
Boundary example (wrong domain): “Design the onboarding flow for new users signing up for our SaaS product.” Response: redirect to
user-onboarding — this skill is for employee onboarding (new hires joining a team), not product user onboarding.
Boundary example (redirect to culture): “Our whole team's norms are broken and we need to rebuild the culture from scratch. Can you include that in the onboarding plan?” Response: redirect to
building-team-culture for the culture redesign; then return here for the new hire's onboarding within the refreshed culture.
Anti-patterns (common failure modes)
- ”Read the docs” first week — Scheduling the new hire to sit alone reading documentation for 3-5 days before meeting anyone. This destroys belonging and delays productive collaboration. Integrate social connection from day 1.
- Information firehose — Dumping every wiki, Slack channel, and meeting invite on the new hire in week 1. Prioritize the 20% of context that covers 80% of day-to-day work; stagger the rest across 30/60/90 days.
- Missing success definition — Creating a detailed onboarding calendar without defining what success looks like at 30/60/90 days. Activities without outcomes lead to busy but unproductive ramp periods.
- Buddy in name only — Assigning a buddy who has no time, no guidance, and no accountability. Buddies need clear expectations (frequency, topics, duration) and protected time.
- Skipping the listening tour — Having a new leader jump straight to “fixing things” without first understanding the current state through structured conversations. This erodes trust and often leads to wrong interventions.