Claude-skill-registry ac-qa-reviewer
Quality assurance review for implementations. Use when reviewing code quality, checking implementation standards, performing QA cycles, or validating feature quality.
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/data/ac-qa-reviewer" ~/.claude/skills/majiayu000-claude-skill-registry-ac-qa-reviewer && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
skills/data/ac-qa-reviewer/SKILL.mdsource content
AC QA Reviewer
Perform quality assurance reviews on feature implementations.
Purpose
Reviews completed features for code quality, adherence to standards, security issues, and best practices before marking features as complete.
Quick Start
from scripts.qa_reviewer import QAReviewer reviewer = QAReviewer(project_dir) result = await reviewer.review_feature("auth-001")
Review Dimensions
Code Quality
- Clean code principles
- DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself)
- SOLID principles
- Code complexity metrics
Security
- Input validation
- SQL injection prevention
- XSS prevention
- Secure authentication
Performance
- Algorithm efficiency
- Database query optimization
- Memory usage
- Caching opportunities
Testing
- Test coverage
- Test quality
- Edge case coverage
- Integration tests
Documentation
- Code comments
- API documentation
- README updates
- Type annotations
Review Result
{ "feature_id": "auth-001", "approved": true, "score": 85, "dimensions": { "code_quality": {"score": 90, "issues": []}, "security": {"score": 85, "issues": ["Consider rate limiting"]}, "performance": {"score": 80, "issues": []}, "testing": {"score": 88, "issues": []}, "documentation": {"score": 82, "issues": ["Add docstring to validate_token"]} }, "blocking_issues": [], "suggestions": [ "Consider extracting authentication middleware", "Add rate limiting for login endpoint" ], "auto_fixable": ["missing_docstring"] }
QA Workflow
1. SCAN → Static analysis of changed files 2. ANALYZE → Check against quality rules 3. SECURITY → Security-specific checks 4. REVIEW → Contextual code review 5. REPORT → Generate review report 6. FIX → Auto-fix simple issues (optional) 7. APPROVE → Mark as QA passed or request changes
Quality Gates
gates: minimum_score: 70 blocking_categories: - security_critical - test_failures required_checks: - linting_passes - type_checks_pass - tests_pass - coverage_minimum
Auto-Fix Capabilities
The reviewer can automatically fix:
- Missing type hints
- Formatting issues
- Simple code style violations
- Missing docstrings (basic)
Integration
- Input: Completed features from
ac-task-executor - Uses:
for static analysisac-code-validator - Reports to:
ac-state-tracker
API Reference
See
scripts/qa_reviewer.py for full implementation.