Claude-skill-registry agent-add-rule
git clone https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/data/agent-add-rule" ~/.claude/skills/majiayu000-claude-skill-registry-agent-add-rule && rm -rf "$T"
skills/data/agent-add-rule/SKILL.mdAdd Rule — Place Agent Instructions Correctly
Add a new rule or convention to the right location in the progressive disclosure structure.
Context Spectrum
Static (root CLAUDE.md) — loaded every conversation. Token cost always paid. Semi-dynamic (docs/agents/) — linked from root. Loaded when Claude follows a link. Fully dynamic (skills) — metadata only in context. Body loaded on trigger.
Workflow
Step 1: Ask
Ask the user: "What rule or convention do you want to add?"
Accept free text. If the user already provided it (e.g.,
/agent-add-rule always use snake_case for database columns), skip this step.
Step 2: Analyze Current Structure
Read:
- Root CLAUDE.md
- List files in docs/agents/
- List available skills
Understand what already exists so you don't duplicate or contradict.
Step 3: Classify
Apply this decision tree:
Does the agent consistently get this wrong WITHOUT being told? ├── NO → Challenge: "Does this justify its token cost?" │ If user still wants it → treat as semi-dynamic │ ├── YES → Does it apply to EVERY task? │ ├── YES → Root CLAUDE.md (static) │ │ Examples: package manager, multi-tenancy, project scripts │ │ │ └── NO → docs/agents/ file (semi-dynamic) │ Examples: lint rules, test thresholds, API conventions │ └── Is it a repeatable workflow or procedural knowledge? ├── YES → Skill (fully dynamic) │ Examples: deployment process, PR review checklist, migration procedure │ └── NO → Probably not needed. Ask: "Does this justify its token cost?"
Key questions to ask the user:
- "Does the agent consistently get this wrong?" — If no, consider skipping
- "Does this apply to every task or just some?" — Static vs semi-dynamic
- "Is this a rule or a workflow?" — docs/agents/ vs skill
- "Will this change frequently?" — Skills are easier to evolve independently
Step 4: Recommend
Present the recommended placement with reasoning:
Recommendation: Add to docs/agents/guardrails.md Reasoning: - This is a data handling rule, not a universal workflow rule - It applies only when working with the database - guardrails.md already covers data isolation patterns - Adding to root would cost tokens on every conversation unnecessarily
Step 5: Confirm
Ask the user to confirm or override. If they override, respect their choice but note the trade-off:
- Moving to root: "This adds ~X lines to every conversation's context"
- Moving to docs/agents/: "This won't be visible unless Claude follows the link"
- Moving to skill: "This will only load when triggered by matching keywords"
Step 6: Write
Based on confirmed placement:
If root CLAUDE.md:
- Add the rule under the appropriate section (Key Rules, Workflow, etc.)
- Warn: "This adds to every conversation's token budget"
- Keep it concise — 1-2 lines max
If existing docs/agents/ file:
- Read the target file
- Add the rule under the appropriate section
- Keep consistent formatting with existing content
If new docs/agents/ file:
- Create the file with a clear heading and the rule
- Update root CLAUDE.md links section with a new entry including routing signal
- Example:
- [API Conventions](docs/agents/api-conventions.md) — REST patterns, error response format, pagination
If skill:
- Tell the user to run
to scaffold it/agent-skill-creator - Provide the rule content as input for the skill body
Examples
Example 1: Universal Rule → Root
User: "Always use pnpm, never npm"
Classification: Agent gets this wrong without being told + applies to every task → Root
Action: Add to Key Rules section in CLAUDE.md
Example 2: Topic-Specific Rule → docs/agents/
User: "API responses must always include a
requestId field"
Classification: Agent might get wrong + only applies to API work → Semi-dynamic
Action: Add to docs/agents/guardrails.md or create docs/agents/api-conventions.md
Example 3: Complex Workflow → Skill
User: "When deploying, always run migrations first, then build, then deploy to staging, verify, then production"
Classification: Repeatable multi-step procedure → Fully dynamic (skill)
Action: Suggest
/agent-skill-creator to create a deployment skill
Example 4: Unnecessary Rule → Challenge
User: "Always use
const instead of let"
Classification: ESLint already enforces this → Not needed
Response: "ESLint already enforces this via the
prefer-const rule. Adding it to agent instructions would cost tokens without benefit. Skip?"
Principles
- Challenge before adding: Every rule costs tokens. Ask "does this justify its token cost?"
- No duplication: If ESLint, TypeScript, or another tool already enforces it, don't add it
- Routing signals matter: When adding to docs/agents/, update the root CLAUDE.md link description so Claude knows when to follow it
- One level deep: Never cross-reference between docs/agents/ files. All links go from root