Claude-skill-registry agent-ops-constitution
Create/update .agent/constitution.md. Use when commands/boundaries/constraints must be confirmed before baseline or code changes. Draft v0 from repo evidence, then interview user.
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/data/agent-ops-constitution" ~/.claude/skills/majiayu000-claude-skill-registry-agent-ops-constitution && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
skills/data/agent-ops-constitution/SKILL.mdsource content
Constitution workflow (mandatory before baseline)
Goal
Make
.agent/constitution.md baseline-ready by confirming:
- allowed/restricted/forbidden work areas
- single-line build/lint/test/format commands
- environment assumptions
- project-specific constraints
- issue-first workflow expectations
Pre-requisite: Context Map
Before starting constitution interview, ensure a context map exists:
- Check if
exists.agent/map.md - If NO map exists:
→ Invoke📍 No context map found. Creating one first to inform constitution questions...
to generateagent-ops-context-map.agent/map.md - If map exists but is stale (>30 days old or significant changes detected):
📍 Context map may be outdated. Refresh? [Y]es / [N]o - Use the map to:
- Pre-populate candidate work areas
- Identify build/test tooling
- Understand project structure for interview questions
Procedure
- Ensure context map exists (see above)
- Run tool detection — invoke
oragent-ops-toolsaoc tools scan --save- Creates
with available development tools.agent/tools.json - Identifies missing recommended tools based on detected project type
- Populates "Available tools" section in constitution
- Creates
- Inspect repo evidence (README, CI workflows, package/build files). Do not guess.
- Draft v0 constitution:
- every inferred item must cite its evidence ("CANDIDATE from <path>")
- anything without evidence is
+TODOUNCONFIRMED - use detected tools to suggest build/lint/test commands
- Interview the user:
- one question per TODO/UNCONFIRMED item
- ask both "what should it be?" and "why?"
- Update constitution until:
- build + test commands are CONFIRMED
- work boundaries are CONFIRMED
- Use
to updateagent-ops-state
..agent/focus.md - Invoke
for any setup work discovered.agent-ops-tasks
Issue Discovery During Constitution
After constitution setup, invoke
discovery:agent-ops-tasks
-
Collect setup items discovered:
- Missing configuration →
issueCHORE - Broken scripts →
issueBUG - Missing documentation →
issueDOCS - Security concerns noted →
issueSEC - Environment issues →
issueCHORE
- Missing configuration →
-
Present to user:
📋 Constitution setup found {N} items to address: High: - [BUG] Build script references missing file - [CHORE] CI workflow needs updating Medium: - [DOCS] README is outdated Create issues for these? [A]ll / [S]elect / [N]one -
Workflow continues:
- Issues created before baseline capture
- Baseline can now proceed with known issues documented
Template
Start from constitution template.
Low Confidence Completeness Check (MANDATORY)
For LOW confidence work, constitution must be verified as complete before proceeding.
Required Sections Checklist
When confidence is LOW, verify constitution has ALL of these sections CONFIRMED (not TODO/UNCONFIRMED):
| Section | Required | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Project scope | ✅ | What this project does |
| Work areas: allowed | ✅ | Where changes are permitted |
| Work areas: restricted | ✅ | Where caution is required |
| Work areas: forbidden | ✅ | Where changes are never allowed |
| Build command | ✅ | Single-line build command |
| Test command | ✅ | Single-line test command |
| Lint command | ✅ | Single-line lint command |
| Format command | ⚪ Optional | Single-line format command |
| Coverage command | ✅ for LOW | How to measure coverage |
| Environment assumptions | ✅ | OS, runtime versions, dependencies |
| Tool detection | ✅ | exists |
| Constraints | ✅ | Project-specific limitations |
| Default confidence | ✅ | LOW/NORMAL/HIGH |
Completeness Verification
Before LOW confidence work begins:
🎯 LOW CONFIDENCE CONSTITUTION CHECK Checking constitution completeness for low confidence work... | Section | Status | |---------|--------| | Project scope | ✅ CONFIRMED | | Allowed areas | ✅ CONFIRMED | | Restricted areas | ✅ CONFIRMED | | Forbidden areas | ⚠️ TODO | | Build command | ✅ CONFIRMED | | Test command | ✅ CONFIRMED | | Lint command | ✅ CONFIRMED | | Coverage command | ❌ MISSING | | Environment | ✅ CONFIRMED | | Tool detection | ✅ .agent/tools.json exists | | Constraints | ⚠️ UNCONFIRMED | Result: INCOMPLETE — 3 items need confirmation ⚠️ Cannot proceed with low confidence work until constitution is complete. Starting interview to fill gaps...
Staleness Check
For LOW confidence, also check constitution age:
| Age | Action |
|---|---|
| < 7 days | Proceed |
| 7-30 days | Prompt: "Constitution is {N} days old. Review before proceeding?" |
| > 30 days | Require: "Constitution is stale. Re-interview before low confidence work." |
Gap-Filling Interview
If constitution is incomplete for LOW confidence:
- List missing/unconfirmed sections
- Invoke
for each gapagent-ops-interview - Update constitution with confirmed values
- Re-verify completeness
- Only proceed when all required sections are CONFIRMED
📋 Constitution gaps for low confidence work: 1. Forbidden work areas (currently: TODO) 2. Coverage command (currently: MISSING) 3. Constraints (currently: UNCONFIRMED) Starting interview to fill these gaps... Q1: What areas of the codebase should NEVER be modified? (These will be marked as forbidden work areas)