Claude-skill-registry ai-persona-creator
Use when analyzing stakeholder psychology for negotiations, proposals, or persuasion. Creates research-backed personas revealing hidden motivations.
git clone https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/data/ai-persona-creator" ~/.claude/skills/majiayu000-claude-skill-registry-ai-persona-creator && rm -rf "$T"
skills/data/ai-persona-creator/SKILL.mdAI Persona Creator
🎯 When to Use
Activate this skill when you need to:
- Persuade stakeholders: Understand CISO, CFO, CIO psychology for approvals
- Prepare negotiations: Analyze counterparty before critical meetings
- Write winning proposals: Identify what decision-makers really care about
- Enable sales teams: Create deep buyer personas beyond demographics
Trigger: "Create persona for [Role] on [Project]"
⚡ Quick Start (30 seconds)
Copy and run this prompt:
Create an AI persona for: - Job/Role: [e.g., E-commerce CTO] - Project: [What you're proposing, e.g., Headless commerce platform migration] - Goal: [What you want from them, e.g., Get technical approval]
What happens automatically:
- 32-48 web searches across 4 categories
- Cross-verification of 3+ independent sources
- 10-framework psychological analysis (Tier 1-3 foundation system)
- Complete persona with research citations
- Self-refinement through 3 quality rounds
Time: 60-90 minutes automated
📋 Step-by-Step Execution
Phase 1: Research (30-45 min)
STEP 1 → Run Web Search Strategy
Execute this prompt:
Run comprehensive web research for [Role] persona: Search Categories (8-12 queries each): 1. Job Understanding: "[Role] responsibilities", "[Role] daily challenges" 2. Decision Psychology: "[Role] decision-making process", "how [Role] evaluates [Project type]" 3. Org Culture: "[Role] reporting structure", "[Role] KPIs and metrics" 4. Field Testimony: "[Role] forum discussions", "[Role] Reddit/community quotes" Save all results to: research/[role-name]/web-search-results.md
STEP 2 → Synthesize Research
Execute this prompt:
Synthesize web research with cross-verification: Requirements: - Minimum 3 independent sources per insight - 5+ direct practitioner quotes required - Cross-verify conflicting information - Calculate confidence levels (%) Save findings to: research/[role-name]/research-findings.md
Phase 2: Analysis (20-30 min)
STEP 3 → Apply 4-Layer Analysis
Execute this prompt:
Analyze [Role] using Divide & Conquer method: Layer 1 (Surface): What do they say publicly? Layer 2 (Hidden): What are they really thinking? Layer 3 (Org Pressure): What organizational forces drive behavior? Layer 4 (Primal): What evolutionary instincts are triggered? Use research findings from STEP 2.
STEP 4 → Run 5 Why Technique
Execute this prompt:
Trace [Role]'s behavior to root psychological cause: Start with: [Observed behavior, e.g., "Rejects cloud proposals"] Why 1: [First-level reason] Why 2: [Deeper reason] Why 3: [Organizational reason] Why 4: [Psychological reason] Why 5: [Root evolutionary/primal reason] Save analysis to psychology profile.
Phase 3: Psychology (20 min)
STEP 5 → Apply 10 Frameworks (Tier 1 Foundation + Core Frameworks)
Execute this prompt:
Apply all 10 psychological frameworks to [Role]: TIER 1 FOUNDATION (Critical base layer - read first): - frameworks/08_motivational_psychology.md → SDT, McClelland's needs, goal orientation - frameworks/09_personality_psychology.md → Big Five/OCEAN, regulatory focus, Type A/B - frameworks/10_trust_risk_psychology.md → Trust equation, loss aversion, betrayal sensitivity Then apply CORE FRAMEWORKS with Tier 1 foundation context: - frameworks/01_kahneman.md → System 1/2, biases (contextualized by personality) - frameworks/02_cialdini.md → 6 persuasion principles, ranked by motivation profile - frameworks/03_voss.md → Hidden needs, black swans (aligned with trust baseline) - frameworks/04_navarro.md → Stress triggers, comfort zones (type A/B based) - frameworks/05_ariely.md → Irrationality patterns (personality-driven) - frameworks/06_evolution.md → Primal drives (survival, status, tribal) - frameworks/07_organization.md → Power structure, stakeholders Integration approach: - First establish WHO they are (Personality), WHAT drives them (Motivation), SAFETY needs (Trust) - Then apply remaining frameworks contextualized by Tier 1 foundation - Use frameworks/00_integration.md for weighted importance and integration logic Save to: research/[role-name]/psychology-profile.md
STEP 6 → Create Comprehensive Profile
Execute this prompt:
Generate comprehensive profile with Tier 1 foundation + analysis: TIER 1 FOUNDATION (WHO they are fundamentally): - Personality (Big Five): Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism - Motivation (McClelland): Achievement (nAch), Power (nPow), Affiliation (nAff) - Trust Baseline: Current trust level, credibility, reliability, intimacy, self-orientation Core Fears (Top 3 with % confidence, grounded in Tier 1): 1. [Fear] (X%) - Evidence: "[Quote]" (Source) - Tier 1 drivers: [personality/motivation/trust factors] 2. [Fear] (Y%) - Evidence: "[Quote]" (Source) 3. [Fear] (Z%) - Evidence: "[Quote]" (Source) Core Motivations (Top 3 with % confidence, aligned with motivation profile): 1. [Motivation] (X%) - Evidence + Implication 2. [Motivation] (Y%) - Evidence + Implication 3. [Motivation] (Z%) - Evidence + Implication Decision Style Prediction (contextualized by personality): - System 1 (Emotion): X% - System 2 (Logic): Y% - Primary bias: [Bias name] - Personality drivers: [How Big Five and regulatory focus shape decision-making] Top 3 Persuasion Levers (ranked by motivation + personality fit): 1. [Cialdini principle] (X%) - Why effective for [personality/motivation profile] 2. [Cialdini principle] (Y%) - Why effective for this role 3. [Cialdini principle] (Z%) - Why effective for this role
Phase 4: Generation (10-15 min)
STEP 7 → Generate Persona Prompt
Execute this prompt:
Create complete persona prompt using template: Read template: templates/persona-prompt.md Fill in all sections: - Background (with past trauma) - Psychological profile (all 7 frameworks) - Feedback generation framework (3 steps) - Red flag detection (4 categories) - Research sources (all citations) Save to: research/[role-name]/persona-prompt.md
STEP 8 → Self-Refine (3 Rounds)
Execute this prompt:
Self-refine persona through 3 rounds: Round 1 - Evidence Check: [ ] 3+ sources per major claim? [ ] 5+ field testimonials? [ ] All 10 frameworks applied (Tier 1 + 7 core)? [ ] Tier 1 foundation explicitly established (personality/motivation/trust)? Round 2 - Quality Rubric (50 points): [ ] Research quality (10 pts) [ ] Analysis depth (10 pts) [ ] Tier 1 foundation integration (5 pts) - NEW [ ] Psychological insight (15 pts) - includes Tier 1 contextualization [ ] Actionability (10 pts) - aligned with psychological profile [ ] Citations (5 pts) Round 3 - Final Polish: [ ] Confidence levels accurate? [ ] Tier 1 foundation (personality/motivation/trust) clearly articulated? [ ] Framework integration shows how Tier 1 shapes other frameworks? [ ] Tactical applications clear and grounded in psychology? [ ] Alternative solutions provided? Target: 45+/50 points (90%+) with full Tier 1 foundation integration
💡 Usage Examples
Example 1: E-commerce CTO (Platform Migration Approval)
Input:
Job/Role: E-commerce CTO Project: Headless commerce platform migration Goal: Get technical approval
Key Output (60-min automated):
- Core fear: Platform downtime during peak sales (95%)
- Decision: 75% data-driven (performance metrics)
- Top levers: Authority (90%), Scarcity (85%)
- Strategy: Performance benchmarks + competitor adoption + ROI projections
Persona Quote:
"Your architecture looks solid. But what keeps me up: explaining to the CEO why we had outages during Black Friday. I need: (1) Load testing results to prove scalability, (2) 3 similar-scale e-commerce platforms using this, (3) Migration roadmap with zero-downtime plan."
Example 2: VC Partner (Series A Funding)
Input:
Job/Role: VC Investment Partner Project: $5M Series A fundraising Goal: Win investment
Key Output:
- Core fear: Missing next unicorn (90%)
- Decision: 60% social proof (peer validation)
- Top levers: Scarcity (90%), Social Proof (95%)
- Strategy: FOMO tactics + "closing soon" + other VC interest
📚 Reference Documentation
Framework Details (when you need deep dives):
TIER 1 FOUNDATION (Read first):
- Motivation drivers (SDT, McClelland, goal orientation)frameworks/08_motivational_psychology.md
- Personality profile (Big Five, regulatory focus, Type A/B)frameworks/09_personality_psychology.md
- Trust foundation (trust equation, loss aversion, betrayal sensitivity)frameworks/10_trust_risk_psychology.md
CORE FRAMEWORKS (Read with Tier 1 context):
- Cognitive biases, System 1/2frameworks/01_kahneman.md
- 6 persuasion principlesframeworks/02_cialdini.md
- Tactical empathy, hidden needsframeworks/03_voss.md
- Behavior analysisframeworks/04_navarro.md
- Predictable irrationalityframeworks/05_ariely.md
- Primal drivesframeworks/06_evolution.md
- Power structuresframeworks/07_organization.md
INTEGRATION GUIDE:
- How to apply Tier 1 + all 7 core frameworks togetherframeworks/00_integration.md
Templates:
- Complete prompt structuretemplates/persona-prompt.md
Additional Resources:
- 3 complete end-to-end examplesEXAMPLES.md
- Installation and setup guideREADME.md
⚙️ Integration with Other Skills
Seamless workflows:
-
Proposal Writing →
skilldocx- Create persona → Customize proposal → Generate professional document
-
Market Research →
skillweb-research- Industry trends → Stakeholder psychology → Market entry strategy
-
Strategic Planning →
skillthinking-framework- Analyze problem → Understand reactions → Implementation plan
-
ROI Analysis →
skillroi-analyzer- Calculate benefits → Understand CFO/CIO → Frame data appropriately
🚨 Limitations & Validation
AI Limitations:
- Web info may be outdated (re-search every 3 months)
- Cultural nuances may need local validation
- Individual variation exists (this is an average profile)
Recommended Validation:
- Interview real stakeholders when possible
- A/B test: Compare predictions vs actual reactions
- Track success rate: % of accurate predictions