Claude-skill-registry analysis
Analyze feature requirements, dependencies, and security considerations. Use when starting feature implementation from GitHub issues to understand scope, technical feasibility, and risks.
git clone https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/data/analysis" ~/.claude/skills/majiayu000-claude-skill-registry-analysis && rm -rf "$T"
skills/data/analysis/SKILL.mdFeature Analysis Skill
Purpose
This skill provides systematic analysis of feature requirements from GitHub issues, evaluating technical feasibility, dependencies, security implications, and implementation scope.
When to Use
- Starting feature implementation from a GitHub issue
- Need to understand requirements and acceptance criteria
- Evaluating technical approach and dependencies
- Identifying security considerations early
- Scoping effort and potential risks
Analysis Workflow
1. Requirements Extraction
From GitHub Issue:
- Parse issue title, description, and acceptance criteria
- Extract functional and non-functional requirements
- Identify user stories and use cases
- Review issue comments for clarifications
- Check linked issues and dependencies
Deliverable: Structured requirements list with priorities
2. Technical Stack Evaluation
Assess Technology Fit:
- Review project's TECH-STACK.md for current technologies
- Identify required libraries/frameworks
- Check version compatibility
- Evaluate performance implications
- Consider maintenance burden
Tools to Use:
- Read TECH-STACK.md and relevant documentation
- Use
for dependency analysisscripts/analyze_deps.py - Grep codebase for similar patterns
Deliverable: Technology recommendations with rationale
3. Dependency Analysis
Identify Dependencies:
- External libraries (pip/npm/cargo packages)
- Internal modules and services
- Database schema changes
- API contracts
- Configuration requirements
Check for Conflicts:
# Use the analyze_deps script python scripts/analyze_deps.py --feature <feature-name>
Deliverable: Dependency map with conflict analysis
4. Security Assessment
Review Security Implications:
- Authentication/authorization requirements
- Input validation needs
- Data sensitivity (PII, credentials, etc.)
- API security (rate limiting, CORS, etc.)
- Dependency vulnerabilities
Use Checklist: Refer to
security-checklist.md for systematic review
Deliverable: Security risk assessment and mitigation plan
5. Scope Definition
Define Boundaries:
- Core functionality (must-have)
- Extended functionality (should-have)
- Future enhancements (could-have)
- Out of scope (won't-have)
Estimate Complexity:
- Lines of code (rough estimate)
- Number of modules/files
- Test coverage requirements
- Documentation needs
Deliverable: Scope statement with effort estimate
Output Format
Create an analysis report with:
# Feature Analysis: [Feature Name] ## Requirements Summary - [ ] Requirement 1 - [ ] Requirement 2 ... ## Technical Approach **Recommended Stack:** Python 3.9+, pytest, pydantic **Key Libraries:** [list] **Architecture Pattern:** [pattern] ## Dependencies **External:** - package-name==version (reason) **Internal:** - module.submodule (reason) ## Security Considerations **Risk Level:** Low/Medium/High **Key Concerns:** - [concern 1]: [mitigation] ## Scope **In Scope:** - [feature 1] **Out of Scope:** - [deferred item] **Effort Estimate:** [hours/days] ## Recommendations 1. [Recommendation 1] 2. [Recommendation 2]
Best Practices
Requirements Analysis:
- Always check requirements-checklist.md for completeness
- Clarify ambiguous requirements before proceeding
- Document assumptions explicitly
- Consider edge cases and error scenarios
Technical Evaluation:
- Prefer existing project patterns over new approaches
- Consider maintainability over cleverness
- Check for similar existing implementations
- Evaluate performance implications early
Security First:
- Run security-checklist.md for all features
- Flag high-risk items for review
- Never skip input validation planning
- Consider data privacy implications
Scope Management:
- Be conservative with estimates
- Identify MVP vs. enhanced features
- Call out dependencies that block progress
- Document what's explicitly out of scope
Supporting Resources
- requirements-checklist.md: Systematic requirements validation
- security-checklist.md: Security considerations framework
- scripts/analyze_deps.py: Automated dependency analysis
Example Usage
# 1. Fetch issue details Use mcp__github-mcp__get_issue to retrieve issue #<number> # 2. Review requirements Work through requirements-checklist.md systematically # 3. Analyze dependencies python scripts/analyze_deps.py --feature feature-name # 4. Security review Complete security-checklist.md # 5. Generate analysis report Create report in docs/implementation/feature-name-analysis.md
Integration with Feature Implementation Flow
Input: GitHub issue number Process: Systematic analysis using checklists and scripts Output: Analysis report + recommendations Next Step: Design skill for architecture planning