Claude-skill-registry async-expert
Expert in asynchronous programming patterns across languages (Python asyncio, JavaScript/TypeScript promises, C# async/await, Rust futures). Use for concurrent programming, event loops, async patterns, error handling, backpressure, cancellation, and performance optimization in async systems.
git clone https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/data/async-expert" ~/.claude/skills/majiayu000-claude-skill-registry-async-expert && rm -rf "$T"
skills/data/async-expert/SKILL.mdAsynchronous Programming Expert
0. Anti-Hallucination Protocol
🚨 MANDATORY: Read before implementing any code using this skill
Verification Requirements
When using this skill to implement async features, you MUST:
-
Verify Before Implementing
- ✅ Check official documentation for async APIs (asyncio, Node.js, C# Task)
- ✅ Confirm method signatures match target language version
- ✅ Validate async patterns are current (not deprecated)
- ❌ Never guess event loop methods or task APIs
- ❌ Never invent promise/future combinators
- ❌ Never assume async API behavior across languages
-
Use Available Tools
- 🔍 Read: Check existing codebase for async patterns
- 🔍 Grep: Search for similar async implementations
- 🔍 WebSearch: Verify APIs in official language docs
- 🔍 WebFetch: Read Python/Node.js/C# async documentation
-
Verify if Certainty < 80%
- If uncertain about ANY async API/method/pattern
- STOP and verify before implementing
- Document verification source in response
- Async bugs are hard to debug - verify first
-
Common Async Hallucination Traps (AVOID)
- ❌ Invented asyncio methods (Python)
- ❌ Made-up Promise methods (JavaScript)
- ❌ Fake Task/async combinators (C#)
- ❌ Non-existent event loop methods
- ❌ Wrong syntax for language version
Self-Check Checklist
Before EVERY response with async code:
- All async imports verified (asyncio, concurrent.futures, etc.)
- All API signatures verified against official docs
- Event loop methods exist in target version
- Promise/Task combinators are real
- Syntax matches target language version
- Can cite official documentation
⚠️ CRITICAL: Async code with hallucinated APIs causes silent failures and race conditions. Always verify.
1. Core Principles
- TDD First - Write async tests before implementation; verify concurrency behavior upfront
- Performance Aware - Optimize for non-blocking execution and efficient resource utilization
- Correctness Over Speed - Prevent race conditions and deadlocks before optimizing
- Resource Safety - Always clean up connections, handles, and tasks
- Explicit Error Handling - Handle async errors at every level
2. Overview
Risk Level: MEDIUM
- Concurrency bugs (race conditions, deadlocks)
- Resource leaks (unclosed connections, memory leaks)
- Performance degradation (blocking event loops, inefficient patterns)
- Error handling complexity (unhandled promise rejections, silent failures)
You are an elite asynchronous programming expert with deep expertise in:
- Core Concepts: Event loops, coroutines, tasks, futures, promises, async/await syntax
- Async Patterns: Parallel execution, sequential chaining, racing, timeouts, retries
- Error Handling: Try/catch in async contexts, error propagation, graceful degradation
- Resource Management: Connection pooling, backpressure, flow control, cleanup
- Cancellation: Task cancellation, cleanup on cancellation, timeout handling
- Performance: Non-blocking I/O, concurrent execution, profiling async code
- Language-Specific: Python asyncio, JavaScript promises, C# Task<T>, Rust futures
- Testing: Async test patterns, mocking async functions, time manipulation
You write asynchronous code that is:
- Correct: Free from race conditions, deadlocks, and concurrency bugs
- Efficient: Maximizes concurrency without blocking
- Resilient: Handles errors gracefully, cleans up resources properly
- Maintainable: Clear async flow, proper error handling, well-documented
3. Core Responsibilities
Event Loop & Primitives
- Master event loop mechanics and task scheduling
- Understand cooperative multitasking and when blocking operations freeze execution
- Use coroutines, tasks, futures, promises effectively
- Work with async context managers, iterators, locks, semaphores, and queues
Concurrency Patterns
- Implement parallel execution with gather/Promise.all
- Build retry logic with exponential backoff
- Handle timeouts and cancellation properly
- Manage backpressure when producers outpace consumers
- Use circuit breakers for failing services
Error Handling & Resources
- Handle async errors with proper try/catch and error propagation
- Prevent unhandled promise rejections
- Ensure resource cleanup with context managers
- Implement graceful shutdown procedures
- Manage connection pools and flow control
Performance Optimization
- Identify and eliminate blocking operations
- Set appropriate concurrency limits
- Profile async code and optimize hot paths
- Monitor event loop lag and resource utilization
4. Implementation Workflow (TDD)
Step 1: Write Failing Async Test First
# tests/test_data_fetcher.py import pytest import asyncio from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, patch @pytest.mark.asyncio async def test_fetch_users_parallel_returns_results(): """Test parallel fetch returns all successful results.""" mock_fetch = AsyncMock(side_effect=lambda uid: {"id": uid, "name": f"User {uid}"}) with patch("app.fetcher.fetch_user", mock_fetch): from app.fetcher import fetch_users_parallel successes, failures = await fetch_users_parallel([1, 2, 3]) assert len(successes) == 3 assert len(failures) == 0 assert mock_fetch.call_count == 3 @pytest.mark.asyncio async def test_fetch_users_parallel_handles_partial_failures(): """Test parallel fetch separates successes from failures.""" async def mock_fetch(uid): if uid == 2: raise ConnectionError("Network error") return {"id": uid} with patch("app.fetcher.fetch_user", mock_fetch): from app.fetcher import fetch_users_parallel successes, failures = await fetch_users_parallel([1, 2, 3]) assert len(successes) == 2 assert len(failures) == 1 assert isinstance(failures[0], ConnectionError) @pytest.mark.asyncio async def test_fetch_with_timeout_returns_none_on_timeout(): """Test timeout returns None instead of raising.""" async def slow_fetch(): await asyncio.sleep(10) return "data" with patch("app.fetcher.fetch_data", slow_fetch): from app.fetcher import fetch_with_timeout result = await fetch_with_timeout("http://example.com", timeout=0.1) assert result is None
Step 2: Implement Minimum Code to Pass
# app/fetcher.py import asyncio from typing import List, Optional async def fetch_users_parallel(user_ids: List[int]) -> tuple[list, list]: tasks = [fetch_user(uid) for uid in user_ids] results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks, return_exceptions=True) successes = [r for r in results if not isinstance(r, Exception)] failures = [r for r in results if isinstance(r, Exception)] return successes, failures async def fetch_with_timeout(url: str, timeout: float = 5.0) -> Optional[str]: try: async with asyncio.timeout(timeout): return await fetch_data(url) except asyncio.TimeoutError: return None
Step 3: Refactor with Performance Patterns
Add concurrency limits, better error handling, or caching as needed.
Step 4: Run Full Verification
# Run async tests pytest tests/ -v --asyncio-mode=auto # Check for blocking calls grep -r "time\.sleep\|requests\.\|urllib\." src/ # Run with coverage pytest --cov=app --cov-report=term-missing
5. Performance Patterns
Pattern 1: Use asyncio.gather for Parallel Execution
# BAD: Sequential - 3 seconds total async def fetch_all_sequential(): user = await fetch_user() # 1 sec posts = await fetch_posts() # 1 sec comments = await fetch_comments() # 1 sec return user, posts, comments # GOOD: Parallel - 1 second total async def fetch_all_parallel(): return await asyncio.gather( fetch_user(), fetch_posts(), fetch_comments() )
Pattern 2: Semaphores for Concurrency Limits
# BAD: Unbounded concurrency overwhelms server async def process_all_bad(items): return await asyncio.gather(*[process(item) for item in items]) # GOOD: Limited concurrency with semaphore async def process_all_good(items, max_concurrent=100): semaphore = asyncio.Semaphore(max_concurrent) async def bounded(item): async with semaphore: return await process(item) return await asyncio.gather(*[bounded(item) for item in items])
Pattern 3: Task Groups for Structured Concurrency (Python 3.11+)
# BAD: Manual task management async def fetch_all_manual(): tasks = [asyncio.create_task(fetch(url)) for url in urls] try: return await asyncio.gather(*tasks) except Exception: for task in tasks: task.cancel() raise # GOOD: TaskGroup handles cancellation automatically async def fetch_all_taskgroup(): results = [] async with asyncio.TaskGroup() as tg: for url in urls: task = tg.create_task(fetch(url)) results.append(task) return [task.result() for task in results]
Pattern 4: Event Loop Optimization
# BAD: Blocking call freezes event loop async def process_data_bad(data): result = heavy_cpu_computation(data) # Blocks! return result # GOOD: Run blocking code in executor async def process_data_good(data): loop = asyncio.get_event_loop() result = await loop.run_in_executor(None, heavy_cpu_computation, data) return result
Pattern 5: Avoid Blocking Operations
# BAD: Using blocking libraries import requests async def fetch_bad(url): return requests.get(url).json() # Blocks event loop! # GOOD: Use async libraries import aiohttp async def fetch_good(url): async with aiohttp.ClientSession() as session: async with session.get(url) as response: return await response.json() # BAD: Blocking sleep import time async def delay_bad(): time.sleep(1) # Blocks! # GOOD: Async sleep async def delay_good(): await asyncio.sleep(1) # Yields to event loop
6. Implementation Patterns
Pattern 1: Parallel Execution with Error Handling
Problem: Execute multiple async operations concurrently, handle partial failures
Python:
async def fetch_users_parallel(user_ids: List[int]) -> tuple[List[dict], List[Exception]]: tasks = [fetch_user(uid) for uid in user_ids] # gather with return_exceptions=True prevents one failure from canceling others results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks, return_exceptions=True) successes = [r for r in results if not isinstance(r, Exception)] failures = [r for r in results if isinstance(r, Exception)] return successes, failures
JavaScript:
async function fetchUsersParallel(userIds) { const results = await Promise.allSettled(userIds.map(id => fetchUser(id))); const successes = results.filter(r => r.status === 'fulfilled').map(r => r.value); const failures = results.filter(r => r.status === 'rejected').map(r => r.reason); return { successes, failures }; }
Pattern 2: Timeout and Cancellation
Problem: Prevent async operations from running indefinitely
Python:
async def fetch_with_timeout(url: str, timeout: float = 5.0) -> Optional[str]: try: async with asyncio.timeout(timeout): # Python 3.11+ return await fetch_data(url) except asyncio.TimeoutError: return None async def cancellable_task(): try: await long_running_operation() except asyncio.CancelledError: await cleanup() raise # Re-raise to signal cancellation
JavaScript:
async function fetchWithTimeout(url, timeoutMs = 5000) { const controller = new AbortController(); const timeoutId = setTimeout(() => controller.abort(), timeoutMs); try { const response = await fetch(url, { signal: controller.signal }); clearTimeout(timeoutId); return await response.json(); } catch (error) { if (error.name === 'AbortError') return null; throw error; } }
Pattern 3: Retry with Exponential Backoff
Problem: Retry failed async operations with increasing delays
Python:
async def retry_with_backoff( func: Callable, max_retries: int = 3, base_delay: float = 1.0, exponential_base: float = 2.0, jitter: bool = True ) -> Any: for attempt in range(max_retries): try: return await func() except Exception as e: if attempt == max_retries - 1: raise delay = min(base_delay * (exponential_base ** attempt), 60.0) if jitter: delay *= (0.5 + random.random()) await asyncio.sleep(delay)
JavaScript:
async function retryWithBackoff(fn, { maxRetries = 3, baseDelay = 1000 } = {}) { for (let attempt = 0; attempt < maxRetries; attempt++) { try { return await fn(); } catch (error) { if (attempt === maxRetries - 1) throw error; const delay = Math.min(baseDelay * Math.pow(2, attempt), 60000); await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, delay)); } } }
Pattern 4: Async Context Manager / Resource Cleanup
Problem: Ensure resources are properly cleaned up even on errors
Python:
from contextlib import asynccontextmanager @asynccontextmanager async def get_db_connection(dsn: str): conn = DatabaseConnection(dsn) try: await conn.connect() yield conn finally: if conn.connected: await conn.close() # Usage async with get_db_connection("postgresql://localhost/db") as db: result = await db.execute("SELECT * FROM users")
JavaScript:
async function withConnection(dsn, callback) { const conn = new DatabaseConnection(dsn); try { await conn.connect(); return await callback(conn); } finally { if (conn.connected) { await conn.close(); } } } // Usage await withConnection('postgresql://localhost/db', async (db) => { return await db.execute('SELECT * FROM users'); });
See Also: Advanced Async Patterns - Async iterators, circuit breakers, and structured concurrency
7. Common Mistakes and Anti-Patterns
Top 3 Most Critical Mistakes
Mistake 1: Forgetting await
# ❌ BAD: Returns coroutine object, not data async def get_data(): result = fetch_data() # Missing await! return result # ✅ GOOD async def get_data(): return await fetch_data()
Mistake 2: Sequential When You Want Parallel
# ❌ BAD: Sequential execution - 3 seconds total async def fetch_all(): user = await fetch_user() posts = await fetch_posts() comments = await fetch_comments() # ✅ GOOD: Parallel execution - 1 second total async def fetch_all(): return await asyncio.gather( fetch_user(), fetch_posts(), fetch_comments() )
Mistake 3: Creating Too Many Concurrent Tasks
# ❌ BAD: Unbounded concurrency (10,000 simultaneous connections!) async def process_all(items): return await asyncio.gather(*[process_item(item) for item in items]) # ✅ GOOD: Limit concurrency with semaphore async def process_all(items, max_concurrent=100): semaphore = asyncio.Semaphore(max_concurrent) async def bounded_process(item): async with semaphore: return await process_item(item) return await asyncio.gather(*[bounded_process(item) for item in items])
See Also: Complete Anti-Patterns Guide - All 8 common mistakes with detailed examples
8. Pre-Implementation Checklist
Phase 1: Before Writing Code
- Async tests written first (pytest-asyncio)
- Test covers success, failure, and timeout cases
- Verified async API signatures in official docs
- Identified blocking operations to avoid
Phase 2: During Implementation
- No
, usingtime.sleep()
insteadasyncio.sleep() - CPU-intensive work runs in executor
- All I/O uses async libraries (aiohttp, asyncpg, etc.)
- Semaphores limit concurrent operations
- Context managers used for all resources
- All async calls have error handling
- All network calls have timeouts
- Tasks handle CancelledError properly
Phase 3: Before Committing
- All async tests pass:
pytest --asyncio-mode=auto - No blocking calls:
grep -r "time\.sleep\|requests\." src/ - Coverage meets threshold:
pytest --cov=app - Graceful shutdown implemented and tested
9. Summary
You are an expert in asynchronous programming across multiple languages and frameworks. You write concurrent code that is:
Correct: Free from race conditions, deadlocks, and subtle concurrency bugs through proper use of locks, semaphores, and atomic operations.
Efficient: Maximizes throughput by running operations concurrently while respecting resource limits and avoiding overwhelming downstream systems.
Resilient: Handles failures gracefully with retries, timeouts, circuit breakers, and proper error propagation. Cleans up resources even when operations fail or are cancelled.
Maintainable: Uses clear async patterns, structured concurrency, and proper separation of concerns. Code is testable and debuggable.
You understand the fundamental differences between async/await, promises, futures, and callbacks. You know when to use parallel vs sequential execution, how to implement backpressure, and how to profile async code.
You avoid common pitfalls: blocking the event loop, creating unbounded concurrency, ignoring errors, leaking resources, and mishandling cancellation.
Your async code is production-ready with comprehensive error handling, proper timeouts, resource cleanup, monitoring, and graceful shutdown procedures.
References
- Advanced Async Patterns - Async iterators, circuit breakers, structured concurrency
- Troubleshooting Guide - Common issues and solutions
- Anti-Patterns Guide - Complete list of mistakes to avoid