Single-Session Performance Audit

Execution Mode Selection

Condition	Mode	Time
Task tool available + no context pressure	Parallel	~20 min
Task tool unavailable	Sequential	~50 min
Context running low (<20% remaining)	Sequential	~50 min
User requests sequential	Sequential	~50 min

---

Section A: Parallel Architecture (2 Agents)

When to use: Task tool available, sufficient context budget

Agent 1: bundle-and-rendering

Focus Areas:

• Bundle Size & Loading (large deps, code splitting, dynamic imports)
• Rendering Performance (re-renders, memoization, virtualization)
• Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS optimization)

Files:

• app/**/*.tsx

  (pages, layouts)

• components/**/*.tsx

• package.json

  (dependencies)

• next.config.mjs

Agent 2: data-and-memory

Focus Areas:

• Data Fetching & Caching (query optimization, caching strategy)
• Memory Management (effect cleanup, subscription leaks)
• Offline Support (offline state, sync strategy)

Files:

• lib/**/*.ts

  (services, utilities)

• hooks/**/*.ts

  (custom hooks)
• Components with

  useEffect

  ,

  onSnapshot

• Service worker, cache configurations

Parallel Execution Command

Invoke both agents in a SINGLE Task message:

Task 1: bundle-and-rendering agent - audit bundle size, rendering, Core Web
Vitals Task 2: data-and-memory agent - audit data fetching, memory, offline
support

Coordination Rules

1. Each agent writes findings to separate JSONL section
2. Bundle findings include estimated KB savings
3. Memory findings include leak detection results
4. Both agents note cross-cutting concerns

---

Pre-Audit: Episodic Memory Search (Session #128)

Before running performance audit, search for context from past sessions:

// Search for past performance audit findings
mcp__plugin_episodic -
  memory_episodic -
  memory__search({
    query: ["performance audit", "bundle size", "rendering"],
    limit: 5,
  });

// Search for specific optimization work done before
mcp__plugin_episodic -
  memory_episodic -
  memory__search({
    query: ["Core Web Vitals", "LCP", "memory leak"],
    limit: 5,
  });

Why this matters:

• Compare against previous performance baselines
• Identify recurring bottlenecks (may need architectural fixes)
• Track optimization progress over time
• Prevent re-flagging already-addressed issues

---

Section B: Sequential Fallback (Single Agent)

When to use: Task tool unavailable, context limits, or user preference

Execution Order:

1. AI Performance Patterns (high-impact AI-generated issues) - 10 min
2. Bundle & Loading - 15 min
3. Data Fetching - 10 min
4. Remaining categories - 15 min

Total: ~50 min (vs ~20 min parallel)

Checkpoint Format

{
  "started_at": "ISO timestamp",
  "categories_completed": ["Bundle", "Rendering"],
  "current_category": "DataFetch",
  "findings_count": 12,
  "last_file_written": "stage-2-findings.jsonl"
}

---

Pre-Audit Validation

Step 1: Check Thresholds

Run

npm run review:check

and report results.

• If no thresholds triggered: "⚠️ No review thresholds triggered. Proceed anyway?"
• Continue with audit regardless (user invoked intentionally)

Step 2: Gather Current Baselines

Collect these metrics by running commands:

# Build output (bundle sizes)
npm run build 2>&1 | tail -30

# Count client vs server components
grep -rn "use client" app/ components/ --include="*.tsx" 2>/dev/null | wc -l
grep -rn "use server" app/ components/ --include="*.tsx" 2>/dev/null | wc -l

# Count useEffect hooks (potential performance issues)
grep -rn "useEffect" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.ts" 2>/dev/null | wc -l

# Count real-time listeners
grep -rn "onSnapshot" --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" 2>/dev/null | wc -l

# Image optimization check
grep -rn "<img" --include="*.tsx" 2>/dev/null | wc -l
grep -rn "next/image" --include="*.tsx" 2>/dev/null | wc -l

Step 3: Load False Positives Database

Read

docs/audits/FALSE_POSITIVES.jsonl

and filter findings matching:

• Category:

  performance

• Expired entries (skip if

  expires

  date passed)

Note patterns to exclude from final findings. If file doesn't exist, proceed with no exclusions.

Step 4: Check Template Currency

Read

docs/templates/MULTI_AI_PERFORMANCE_AUDIT_PLAN_TEMPLATE.md

and verify:

• Stack versions match package.json
• Bundle size baseline is recent
• Performance-critical paths are accurate

If outdated, note discrepancies but proceed with current values.

---

Audit Execution

Focus Areas (6 Categories):

1. Bundle Size & Loading (large deps, code splitting, dynamic imports)

2. Rendering Performance (re-renders, memoization, virtualization)

3. Data Fetching & Caching (query optimization, caching strategy)

4. Memory Management (effect cleanup, subscription leaks)

5. Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS optimization)

6. Offline Support (NEW - 2026-01-17):

   • Offline state storage (localStorage, IndexedDB, cache API)
   • Sync strategy (optimistic updates, conflict resolution)
   • Failure mode handling (network errors, retry logic)
   • Offline-first data patterns (queue writes, batch sync)
   • Service worker caching strategy
   • Offline testability (can app function without network?)

7. AI Performance Patterns (AI-Codebase Specific - NEW 2026-02-02):

   • Naive Data Fetching: AI defaults to fetch-all then filter client-side (S1)
   • Missing Pagination: AI often forgets pagination for lists (S2)
   • Redundant Re-Renders: AI-generated components without memo/useMemo (S2)
   • Duplicate API Calls: Same data fetched in multiple places (S2)
   • Sync Where Async Needed: AI sometimes uses sync file ops in Node.js (S2)
   • Over-Fetching: Fetching entire documents when only fields needed (S2)
   • Missing Loading States: No suspense boundaries or loading indicators (S2)
   • Unbounded Queries: Firestore queries without limit() (S1)

For each category:

1. Search relevant files using Grep/Glob
2. Identify specific issues with file:line references
3. Classify severity: S0 (>50% impact) | S1 (20-50%) | S2 (5-20%) | S3 (<5%)
4. Estimate effort: E0 (trivial) | E1 (hours) | E2 (day) | E3 (major)
5. Note affected metric (LCP, bundle, render, memory)
6. Assign confidence level (see Evidence Requirements below)

Performance Patterns to Find:

• Inline arrow functions in JSX props
• Object literals in JSX props
• Missing React.memo on frequently re-rendered components
• useEffect without cleanup
• Large components without code splitting
• Queries without limits
• onSnapshot where one-time fetch would suffice

Scope:

• Include:

  app/

  ,

  components/

  ,

  lib/

  ,

  hooks/

• Exclude:

  node_modules/

  ,

  .next/

  ,

  docs/

  ,

  tests/

---

Evidence Requirements (MANDATORY)

All findings MUST include:

1. File:Line Reference - Exact location (e.g.,

   components/List.tsx:45

   )
2. Code Snippet - The actual problematic code (3-5 lines of context)
3. Verification Method - How you confirmed this is an issue (build output, grep, profiling)
4. Impact Estimate - Quantified performance impact (% improvement, KB saved, ms saved)

Confidence Levels:

• HIGH (90%+): Confirmed by build output, Lighthouse, or profiling data; verified file exists, code snippet matches
• MEDIUM (70-89%): Found via pattern search, file verified, performance impact estimated
• LOW (<70%): Pattern match only, impact uncertain, needs profiling to confirm

S0/S1 findings require:

• HIGH or MEDIUM confidence (LOW confidence S0/S1 must be escalated)
• Dual-pass verification (re-read the code after initial finding)
• Quantified impact estimate with methodology

---

Cross-Reference Validation

Before finalizing findings, cross-reference with:

1. Build output - Mark bundle findings as "TOOL_VALIDATED" if build shows large chunks
2. Lighthouse data - Mark Web Vitals findings as "TOOL_VALIDATED" if Lighthouse flagged
3. React DevTools - Mark rendering findings as "TOOL_VALIDATED" if profiler confirms re-renders
4. Prior audits - Check

   docs/audits/single-session/performance/

   for duplicate findings

Findings without tool validation should note:

"cross_ref": "MANUAL_ONLY"

---

Dual-Pass Verification (S0/S1 Only)

For all S0 (>50% impact) and S1 (20-50% impact) findings:

1. First Pass: Identify the issue, note file:line and initial evidence
2. Second Pass: Re-read the actual code in context
   • Verify the performance issue is real
   • Check for existing optimizations (memo, useMemo, useCallback)
   • Confirm file and line still exist
3. Decision: Mark as CONFIRMED or DOWNGRADE (with reason)

Document dual-pass result in finding:

"verified": "DUAL_PASS_CONFIRMED"

or

"verified": "DOWNGRADED_TO_S2"

---

Output Requirements

1. Markdown Summary (display to user):

## Performance Audit - [DATE]

### Baselines

- Build time: Xs
- Bundle size: X KB (gzipped)
- Client components: X
- useEffect hooks: X
- Real-time listeners: X

### Findings Summary

| Severity | Count | Affected Metric | Confidence  |
| -------- | ----- | --------------- | ----------- |
| S0       | X     | ...             | HIGH/MEDIUM |
| S1       | X     | ...             | HIGH/MEDIUM |
| S2       | X     | ...             | ...         |
| S3       | X     | ...             | ...         |

### Top 5 Optimization Opportunities

1. [file:line] - Description (S1/E1) - Est. X% improvement - DUAL_PASS_CONFIRMED
2. ...

### False Positives Filtered

- X findings excluded (matched FALSE_POSITIVES.jsonl patterns)

### Quick Wins (E0-E1)

- ...

### Recommendations

- ...

2. JSONL Findings (save to file):

Create file:

docs/audits/single-session/performance/audit-[YYYY-MM-DD].jsonl

CRITICAL - Use JSONL_SCHEMA_STANDARD.md format:

{
  "category": "performance",
  "title": "Short specific title",
  "fingerprint": "performance::path/to/file.ts::identifier",
  "severity": "S0|S1|S2|S3",
  "effort": "E0|E1|E2|E3",
  "confidence": 90,
  "files": ["path/to/file.ts:123"],
  "why_it_matters": "1-3 sentences explaining performance impact",
  "suggested_fix": "Concrete optimization direction",
  "acceptance_tests": ["Array of verification steps"],
  "evidence": ["code snippet", "build output", "profiling data"],
  "performance_details": {
    "affected_metric": "LCP|INP|CLS|bundle|render|memory",
    "current_metric": "current value",
    "expected_improvement": "estimated improvement"
  }
}

For S0/S1 findings, ALSO include verification_steps:

{
  "verification_steps": {
    "first_pass": {
      "method": "grep|tool_output|file_read|code_search",
      "evidence_collected": ["initial evidence"]
    },
    "second_pass": {
      "method": "contextual_review|exploitation_test|manual_verification",
      "confirmed": true,
      "notes": "Confirmation notes"
    },
    "tool_confirmation": {
      "tool": "lighthouse|typescript|webpack|NONE",
      "reference": "Tool output or NONE justification"
    }
  }
}

⚠️ REQUIRED FIELDS (per JSONL_SCHEMA_STANDARD.md):

• category

  - MUST be

  performance

  (normalized)

• fingerprint

  - Format:

  <category>::<primary_file>::<identifier>

• files

  - Array with file paths (include line as

  file.ts:123

  )

• confidence

  - Number 0-100 (not string)

• acceptance_tests

  - Non-empty array of verification steps

3. Markdown Report (save to file):

Create file:

docs/audits/single-session/performance/audit-[YYYY-MM-DD].md

Full markdown report with all findings, baselines, and optimization plan.

---

Post-Audit Validation

Before finalizing the audit:

1. Run Validation Script:

   node scripts/validate-audit.js docs/audits/single-session/performance/audit-[YYYY-MM-DD].jsonl
   

2. Validation Checks:

   • All findings have required fields
   • No matches in FALSE_POSITIVES.jsonl (or documented override)
   • No duplicate findings
   • All S0/S1 have HIGH or MEDIUM confidence
   • All S0/S1 have DUAL_PASS_CONFIRMED or TOOL_VALIDATED

3. If validation fails:

   • Review flagged findings
   • Fix or document exceptions
   • Re-run validation

---

Post-Audit

1. Display summary to user
2. Confirm files saved to

   docs/audits/single-session/performance/

3. Run

   node scripts/validate-audit.js

   on the JSONL file
4. Validate CANON schema (if audit updates CANON files):

   npm run validate:canon
   

   Ensure all CANON files pass validation before committing.
5. Update AUDIT_TRACKER.md - Add entry to "Performance Audits" table:
   • Date: Today's date
   • Session: Current session number from SESSION_CONTEXT.md
   • Commits Covered: Number of commits since last performance audit
   • Files Covered: Number of performance-critical files analyzed
   • Findings: Total count (e.g., "2 S1, 4 S2, 3 S3")
   • Reset Threshold: YES (single-session audits reset that category's threshold)
6. TDMS Integration (MANDATORY) - Ingest findings to canonical debt store:

   node scripts/debt/intake-audit.js docs/audits/single-session/performance/audit-[YYYY-MM-DD].jsonl --source "audit-performance-[DATE]"
   

   This assigns DEBT-XXXX IDs and adds to

   docs/technical-debt/MASTER_DEBT.jsonl

   . See

   docs/technical-debt/PROCEDURE.md

   for the full TDMS workflow.
7. Ask: "Would you like me to fix any of these issues now? (Quick wins recommended first)"

---

Threshold System

Category-Specific Thresholds

This audit resets the performance category threshold in

docs/AUDIT_TRACKER.md

(single-session audits reset their own category; multi-AI audits reset all thresholds). Reset means the commit counter for this category starts counting from zero after this audit.

Performance audit triggers (check AUDIT_TRACKER.md):

• 30+ commits since last performance audit, OR
• Bundle size change detected, OR
• New heavy dependencies added

Multi-AI Escalation

After 3 single-session performance audits, a full multi-AI Performance Audit is recommended. Track this in AUDIT_TRACKER.md "Single audits completed" counter.

---

Adding New False Positives

If you encounter a pattern that should be excluded from future audits:

node scripts/add-false-positive.js \
  --pattern "regex-pattern" \
  --category "performance" \
  --reason "Explanation of why this is not a performance issue" \
  --source "AI_REVIEW_LEARNINGS_LOG.md#review-XXX"

---

Documentation References

Before running this audit, review:

TDMS Integration (Required)

• PROCEDURE.md - Full TDMS workflow
• MASTER_DEBT.jsonl - Canonical debt store
• Intake command:

  node scripts/debt/intake-audit.js <output.jsonl> --source "audit-performance-<date>"

Documentation Standards (Required)

• JSONL_SCHEMA_STANDARD.md - Output format requirements and TDMS field mapping
• DOCUMENTATION_STANDARDS.md - 5-tier doc hierarchy