bdd-workflow

Skill Type: Orchestrator (BDD Workflow) Purpose: Coordinate complete BDD cycle with Given/When/Then scenarios Prerequisites:

• Work unit with REQ-* key (e.g., "Create scenario for <REQ-ID>")
• Requirement details available

---

Agent Instructions

You are orchestrating the complete Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) workflow.

Your goal is to implement a requirement using Given/When/Then scenarios in pure business language while maintaining requirement traceability.

---

Workflow

Phase 0: Prerequisites Check

Before starting BDD, verify:

1. ✅ Requirement key exists (REQ-F-, REQ-NFR-, REQ-DATA-*)
2. ✅ Requirement details available (what to implement)
3. ✅ Working directory is a git repository
4. ✅ BDD framework available (Cucumber, Behave, etc.)

If prerequisites missing:

• No REQ-* key → Invoke

  requirement-extraction

  skill
• No requirement details → Ask user for clarification
• Not a git repo → Ask user if they want to initialize git
• No BDD framework → Ask user which framework to install

---

Phase 1: SCENARIO (Write Given/When/Then)

Invoke:

write-scenario

skill

Purpose: Write behavior scenarios in business language

What write-scenario does:

• Creates feature file (e.g.,

  features/authentication.feature

  )
• Writes scenarios in Gherkin format (Given/When/Then)
• Tags scenarios with REQ-* key in comments
• Uses pure business language (no technical jargon)
• Commits: "SCENARIO: Add scenarios for REQ-*"

Success Criteria: Scenarios written in business language

---

Phase 2: STEP DEFINITIONS (Implement Test Code)

Invoke:

implement-step-definitions

skill

Purpose: Translate Given/When/Then into executable test code

What implement-step-definitions does:

• Creates step definition file (e.g.,

  steps/authentication_steps.py

  )
• Implements step definitions for each Given/When/Then
• Tags steps with REQ-* key in comments
• Runs scenarios → expects FAILURE (implementation doesn't exist)
• Commits: "STEP DEF: Add step definitions for REQ-*"

Success Criteria: Step definitions exist, scenarios fail

---

Phase 3: IMPLEMENT (Make Scenarios Pass)

Invoke:

implement-feature

skill

Purpose: Implement feature to make scenarios pass

What implement-feature does:

• Creates implementation file (e.g.,

  src/auth/authentication.py

  )
• Implements feature code to pass scenarios
• Tags code with REQ-* key in comments
• Runs scenarios → expects SUCCESS (scenarios pass)
• Commits: "IMPLEMENT: Implement REQ-*"

Success Criteria: Scenarios PASS

---

Phase 4: REFACTOR (Improve Quality + Eliminate Tech Debt)

Invoke:

refactor-bdd

skill

Purpose: Improve code quality and eliminate technical debt

What refactor-bdd does:

• Refactors feature implementation
• Refactors step definitions
• Eliminates tech debt (Principle #6)
• Runs scenarios → expects STILL PASSING
• Commits: "REFACTOR: Clean up REQ-*"

Success Criteria: Scenarios still PASS, tech debt = 0

---

Output Format

When you complete the BDD workflow, show:

[BDD Workflow: <REQ-ID>]

✅ Phase 0: Prerequisites
  ✓ Requirement: <REQ-ID> (User login)
  ✓ BDD Framework: behave (Python)
  ✓ Git repository: initialized
  ✓ Working tree: clean

✅ Phase 1: SCENARIO (Write Given/When/Then)
  ✓ Created: features/authentication.feature (3 scenarios)
  ✓ Business language ✓ (no technical jargon)
  ✓ Commit: SCENARIO: Add scenarios for <REQ-ID>

✅ Phase 2: STEP DEFINITIONS (Implement Test Code)
  ✓ Created: steps/authentication_steps.py (12 step definitions)
  ✓ Scenarios running... FAILED ✓ (expected - no implementation)
  ✓ Commit: STEP DEF: Add step definitions for <REQ-ID>

✅ Phase 3: IMPLEMENT (Make Scenarios Pass)
  ✓ Created: src/auth/authentication.py
  ✓ Implemented: login() function
  ✓ Scenarios running... PASSED ✓
  ✓ Commit: IMPLEMENT: Implement <REQ-ID>

✅ Phase 4: REFACTOR (Improve Quality)
  Code Quality Improvements:
    ✓ Added type hints
    ✓ Improved step definition reusability

  Tech Debt Pruning:
    ✓ Deleted 1 unused import
    ✓ Simplified step definition logic

  ✓ Scenarios still PASSING ✓
  ✓ Commit: REFACTOR: Clean up <REQ-ID>

🎉 BDD Workflow Complete!
  Files: 3 files (authentication.feature, authentication_steps.py, authentication.py)
  Scenarios: 3 scenarios, all passing
  Step Definitions: 12 steps
  Traceability: <REQ-ID> → commit xyz789

---

Homeostasis Behavior

If prerequisites not met:

1. Detect: Missing REQ-* key
2. Signal: "Need requirement extraction first"
3. Claude invokes:

   requirement-extraction

   skill
4. Retry: bdd-workflow with new REQ-*

If scenarios fail in IMPLEMENT phase:

1. Detect: Scenarios still failing after implementation
2. Signal: "Implementation incomplete"
3. Claude: Fix implementation and retry
4. Do NOT proceed to REFACTOR until scenarios pass

If tech debt detected in REFACTOR phase:

1. Detect: Unused code, complexity > 10, etc.
2. Signal: "Tech debt detected"
3. Claude invokes:

   prune-unused-code

   ,

   simplify-complex-code

4. Verify: Tech debt eliminated before commit

---

Prerequisites Check

Before invoking this skill, ensure:

1. ✅ Requirement key (REQ-*) exists
2. ✅ Requirement details available
3. ✅ Git repository initialized
4. ✅ BDD framework available (or can install)

If prerequisites not met:

• Missing REQ-* → Invoke

  requirement-extraction

  skill
• No BDD framework → Ask user which to install (Cucumber, Behave, etc.)

---

Skills Used

This orchestrator skill invokes:

1. write-scenario

   - Write Given/When/Then scenarios

2. implement-step-definitions

   - Implement step definitions

3. implement-feature

   - Implement feature code

4. refactor-bdd

   - Refactor and eliminate tech debt

5. detect-unused-code

   - (via refactor-bdd) Detect tech debt

6. prune-unused-code

   - (via refactor-bdd) Eliminate tech debt

---

Configuration

This skill respects configuration in

.claude/plugins.yml

:

plugins:
  - name: "@aisdlc/code-skills"
    config:
      bdd:
        gherkin_style: "cucumber"     # cucumber | behave
        require_scenarios_for_requirements: true
        scenario_language: "en"       # Gherkin language
        include_backgrounds: true     # Use Background sections

---

BDD vs TDD

When to use BDD:

• ✅ Requirements written as user stories
• ✅ Stakeholders want readable tests
• ✅ Integration/acceptance testing
• ✅ Business validation focus

When to use TDD:

• ✅ Unit testing focus
• ✅ Low-level implementation
• ✅ Technical requirements
• ✅ Developer-focused testing

Both can coexist: Use BDD for acceptance tests, TDD for unit tests.

---

Next Steps

After BDD workflow completes:

1. Review scenarios with stakeholders
2. Run scenarios as part of CI/CD
3. Move to next requirement (invoke

   bdd-workflow

   for next REQ-*)

---

Notes

Why BDD workflow?

• Business language = stakeholders can read tests
• Given/When/Then = clear specification of behavior
• Scenarios = living documentation of requirements
• Executable specs = tests ARE the specification

BDD complements TDD:

BDD: High-level behavior (user perspective)
  ↓ validates
TDD: Low-level implementation (developer perspective)

Homeostasis Goal:

desired_state:
  scenarios_in_business_language: true
  scenarios_passing: true
  tech_debt: 0
  requirement_traceability: complete

"Excellence or nothing" 🔥