Claude-skill-registry c3-audit

Use when verifying C3 documentation quality - checks methodology compliance (layer rules, structure, diagrams) and implementation conformance (docs vs code drift)

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/data/c3-audit" ~/.claude/skills/majiayu000-claude-skill-registry-c3-audit && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: skills/data/c3-audit/SKILL.md
source content

C3 Audit

Overview

Verify C3 documentation from two angles:

  1. Methodology Compliance - Do docs follow C3 layer rules?
  2. Implementation Conformance - Do docs match code reality?

Announce: "I'm using the c3-audit skill to audit documentation."

Audit Modes

ModePurposeWhen
MethodologyVerify layer rulesAfter doc changes
FullAll docs vs codePeriodic health check
ADRVerify ADR implementedAfter ADR work
ADR-PlanADR ↔ Plan coherenceBefore handoff
ContainerSingle container auditAfter container changes
QuickInventory check onlyFast sanity check

Mode 0: Methodology Audit

Phase 1: Load Layer Rules

Load rules from

references/layer-audit-rules.md
(or layer skill defaults).

Phase 2: Structure Check

Verify IDs, paths, frontmatter per

references/v3-structure.md
.

Phase 3: Layer Content Audit

For each doc, verify content matches layer rules:

  • Context: Has container inventory, protocols. NO component lists.
  • Container: Has component inventory, tech stack. NO step-by-step algorithms.
  • Component: Has flow, dependencies. NO sibling relationships.

Phase 4: Diagram Audit

Verify diagram types appropriate per layer (see

references/layer-audit-rules.md
).

Phase 5: Contract Chain

Check for orphans (undocumented) and phantoms (documented but missing).

Phase 6: Load Layer Skills

Load c3-context-design, c3-container-design, c3-component-design for suggestion generation.

Phase 7: Generate Report

Use template from

references/audit-report-templates.md
.

Mode 1: Full Audit

  1. Load all C3 docs (inventory)
  2. Explore codebase (Task tool, Explore agent)
  3. Compare: inventory drift, technology drift, structure drift, protocol drift
  4. Generate drift report

Mode 2: ADR Audit

  1. Load ADR, extract Changes Across Layers + Verification Checklist
  2. Verify each doc change was made
  3. Verify code matches (use verification items)
  4. Update Audit Record in ADR file:
    • Append row to "Audit Runs" table:
      | YYYY-MM-DD | [layers checked] | PASS/FAIL | [drift found or "None"] |
      
    • If PASS: Update "Lifecycle" table row for Implemented
  5. If all pass: transition status to
    implemented
    , rebuild TOC

📋 ADR STATUS ENFORCEMENT (MANDATORY)

This applies to Mode 2 (ADR Audit) and any audit that touches ADRs.

Status Workflow

proposed → accepted → implemented
                   ↘ superseded
                   ↘ deprecated

Status Transition Rules

TransitionRequirementWho
proposed
accepted
Design reviewed, approach approvedHuman decision
accepted
implemented
All doc changes made, code matches, verification passesAudit verifies
Any →
superseded
New ADR replaces this one (link required)Human decision
Any →
deprecated
Decision no longer relevantHuman decision

Audit Verification for
implemented
Status

BEFORE transitioning to

implemented
, verify ALL:

CheckHow to Verify
All "Changes Across Layers" madeEach doc modified as specified
Verification checklist passesEach item checked and passes
Code matches docsImplementation conforms to documented changes
Implementation Plan completeAll Code Changes done, Acceptance Criteria met

TOC Filtering

Only

status: implemented
ADRs appear in TOC.

After transitioning to

implemented
:

# Rebuild TOC using build-toc.sh from plugin
./build-toc.sh

Red Flags - STOP and Fix

🚩 ADR with

implemented
status but verification items unchecked 🚩 ADR in TOC but status is
proposed
or
accepted
🚩
superseded
ADR without link to replacement 🚩 Missing
status
field in frontmatter 🚩 Skipping
accepted
(going straight from
proposed
to
implemented
)

Audit Checklist for ADR Status

  • ADR has
    status
    field in frontmatter
  • Status is valid (
    proposed
    ,
    accepted
    ,
    implemented
    ,
    superseded
    ,
    deprecated
    )
  • If
    implemented
    : all verifications pass
  • If
    superseded
    : links to replacement ADR
  • TOC only includes
    implemented
    ADRs

Mode 3: ADR-Plan Coherence

  1. Extract ADR sections + Implementation Plan
  2. Verify: Layer Changes → Code Changes (all mapped)
  3. Verify: Verifications → Acceptance Criteria (all mapped)
  4. Check for orphans, vague locations, untestable criteria

Mode 4: Container Audit

Focus on single container: technology match, component coverage, pattern compliance.

Mode 5: Quick Audit

# Inventory counts only
grep -c "| c3-[0-9]" .c3/README.md
ls -d .c3/c3-[0-9]-*/ 2>/dev/null | wc -l

Checklist

See

references/audit-report-templates.md
for full checklists per mode.

Related

  • references/layer-audit-rules.md
    - Layer compliance rules
  • references/audit-report-templates.md
    - Report formats
  • references/v3-structure.md
    - ID/path patterns