Claude-skill-registry code-review-checklist
Auto-activates when user mentions code review, reviewing code, PR review, or checking code quality. Provides systematic code review process with TodoWrite checklist.
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/data/code-review-checklist" ~/.claude/skills/majiayu000-claude-skill-registry-code-review-checklist-105507 && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
skills/data/code-review-checklist/SKILL.mdsource content
Code Review Checklist
Systematic code review process ensuring quality, security, and maintainability.
When This Activates
- User says: "review this code", "code review", "check this PR"
- Before creating/merging PR
- When reviewing changes
Review Checklist (TodoWrite)
Create todos for each item:
1. Functionality
- Code does what it claims to do
- Edge cases handled
- Error handling present
- No obvious bugs
2. Code Quality
- Clear variable/function names
- Functions are single-purpose
- No code duplication
- Follows project conventions
- No commented-out code
3. Testing
- Tests exist and pass
- Tests cover new functionality
- Tests cover edge cases
- No skipped/disabled tests without reason
4. Security
- No hardcoded secrets/API keys
- Input validation present
- SQL injection prevented (parameterized queries)
- XSS prevented (sanitized output)
- Authentication/authorization checked
5. Performance
- No obvious performance issues
- Database queries optimized
- No N+1 query problems
- Large lists paginated
- Heavy operations async
6. Documentation
- Public APIs documented
- Complex logic explained
- README updated if needed
- CHANGELOG updated if needed
Process
- Create TodoWrite checklist from items above
- Mark in_progress as you review each
- Add findings as you discover issues
- Complete when reviewed
- Present summary with:
- ✅ Approved items
- ⚠️ Issues found
- 🔴 Blockers
Review Findings Format
## Code Review Summary ### ✅ Strengths - Clear naming conventions - Good test coverage (85%) - Error handling comprehensive ### ⚠️ Minor Issues 1. Line 45: Variable name `x` should be `userId` 2. Line 102: Missing error case for null input 3. Missing JSDoc comment on `processData` function **Suggested fixes:** [code suggestions] ### 🔴 Blockers (MUST FIX) 1. Line 78: **Hardcoded API key** - Move to environment variable 2. Line 123: **SQL injection risk** - Use parameterized query **These must be fixed before merge.** ### 📊 Metrics - Files changed: 5 - Lines added: 230 - Lines removed: 45 - Test coverage: 85% → 88% - Complexity: Medium ### 💡 Recommendations - Consider extracting `validateUser` to shared util - Add integration test for auth flow - Document breaking changes in CHANGELOG
Auto-Checks
Run automated checks:
# Lint npm run lint # Type check npm run typecheck # Tests npm test # Security scan npm audit # Check for secrets git diff --cached | grep -i "api[_-]key\\|password\\|secret\\|token"
Common Issues
| Issue | Fix |
|---|---|
| Hardcoded secrets | Move to , add to |
| SQL injection | Use parameterized queries |
| Missing tests | Add tests before merge |
| Complex function | Break into smaller functions |
| Magic numbers | Extract to named constants |
| No error handling | Add try/catch, validate inputs |
Use TodoWrite to track all checklist items. Present summary when complete.