Codebase Analysis Workflow

Execute a structured 4-phase codebase analysis workflow to gather insights.

CRITICAL: Complete ALL 4 phases. The workflow is not complete until Phase 4: Post-Analysis Actions is finished. After completing each phase, immediately proceed to the next phase without waiting for user prompts.

Phase Overview

1. Exploration — Launch parallel agents to investigate the codebase
2. Synthesis — Merge and analyze findings via synthesizer agent
3. Reporting — Present structured analysis to the user
4. Post-Analysis Actions — Save, document, or retain analysis insights

---

Phase 1: Codebase Exploration

Goal: Thoroughly explore the codebase to gather raw findings.

1. Determine analysis context:

   • If

     $ARGUMENTS

     is provided, use it as the analysis context (feature area, question, or general exploration goal)
   • If no arguments, set context to "general codebase understanding"
   • Set

     PATH = current working directory

   • Inform the user: "Analyzing codebase at:

     PATH

     " with the analysis context

2. Load skills for this phase:

   • Read

     ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/project-conventions/SKILL.md

     and apply its guidance
   • Read

     ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/language-patterns/SKILL.md

     and apply its guidance

3. Determine focus areas:

   • For feature-focused analysis, use 3 agents:

     Agent 1: Explore entry points and user-facing code related to the context
     Agent 2: Explore data models, schemas, and storage related to the context
     Agent 3: Explore utilities, helpers, and shared infrastructure
     

   • For general codebase understanding, 2 agents may suffice:

     Agent 1: Explore application structure, entry points, and core logic
     Agent 2: Explore configuration, infrastructure, and shared utilities
     

4. Launch code-explorer agents:

   Launch agents in parallel using the Task tool with

   subagent_type: "dev-tools:code-explorer"

   :

   Path to analyze: [PATH]
   Analysis context: [context from step 1]
   Focus area: [specific focus for this agent]
   
   Find and analyze:
   - Relevant files and their purposes
   - Key functions/classes and their roles
   - Existing patterns and conventions
   - Integration points and dependencies
   
   Return a structured report of your findings.
   

5. Handle agent failures:

   • If an agent fails, note which focus area was missed
   • Continue with successful results — partial findings are still valuable
   • If all agents fail, inform the user and offer to retry or explore manually

---

Phase 2: Synthesis and Analysis

Goal: Merge exploration findings into a unified analysis.

1. Launch codebase-synthesizer agent:

   Use the Task tool with

   subagent_type: "dev-tools:codebase-synthesizer"

   and

   model: "opus"

   :

   Analysis context: [context from Phase 1]
   Codebase path: [PATH]
   
   Exploration findings from [N] agents:
   
   --- Agent 1: [Focus Area] ---
   [Full report from agent 1]
   
   --- Agent 2: [Focus Area] ---
   [Full report from agent 2]
   
   --- Agent 3: [Focus Area] (if applicable) ---
   [Full report from agent 3]
   
   Synthesize these findings into a unified analysis. Merge duplicates,
   read critical files in depth, map relationships between components,
   identify patterns, and assess challenges.
   

2. Review synthesis:

   • Verify the synthesizer covered all focus areas
   • If critical gaps exist, use Glob/Grep to fill them directly

---

Phase 3: Reporting

Goal: Present a structured analysis to the user.

1. Load report template:

   • Read

     ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/codebase-analysis/references/report-template.md

   • Use it to structure the presentation

2. Present the analysis: Structure the report with these sections:

   • Executive Summary — Lead with the most important finding
   • Architecture Overview — How the codebase is structured
   • Critical Files — The 5-10 most important files with details
   • Patterns & Conventions — Recurring patterns and coding conventions
   • Relationship Map — How components connect to each other
   • Challenges & Risks — Technical risks and complexity hotspots
   • Recommendations — Actionable next steps

3. IMPORTANT: Proceed immediately to Phase 4. Do NOT stop here. Do NOT wait for user input. The report is presented, but the workflow requires Post-Analysis Actions. Continue directly to Phase 4 now.

---

Phase 4: Post-Analysis Actions

Goal: Let the user save, document, or retain analysis insights from the report.

1. Present action menu:

   Use

   AskUserQuestion

   with

   multiSelect: true

   to present all available actions:
   • Save report as Markdown file — Write the full report to a file
   • Update README.md with analysis insights — Add architecture/structure info to README
   • Update CLAUDE.md with analysis insights — Add patterns/conventions to CLAUDE.md
   • Keep a condensed summary in memory — Retain a quick-reference summary in conversation context
   • Address actionable insights — Fix challenges and implement recommendations from the report

   If the user selects no actions, the workflow is complete. Thank the user and end.

2. Execute selected actions in the following fixed order:

   Action: Save Report as Markdown File

   • Check if a

     docs/

     directory exists in the project root
     • If yes, suggest default path:

       docs/codebase-analysis.md

     • If no, suggest default path:

       codebase-analysis.md

       in the project root
   • Use

     AskUserQuestion

     to let the user confirm or customize the file path
   • Write the full report content (same as Phase 3 output) to the confirmed path using the Write tool
   • Confirm the file was saved

   Action: Update README.md

   • Read the existing README.md at the project root
     • If no README.md exists, skip this action and inform the user
   • Draft updates based on analysis insights — focus on:
     • Architecture overview
     • Project structure
     • Tech stack summary
   • Present the draft to the user for approval using

     AskUserQuestion

     with options:
     • Apply — Apply the drafted updates
     • Modify — Let the user describe what to change, then re-draft
     • Skip — Skip this action entirely
   • If approved, apply updates using the Edit tool

   Action: Update CLAUDE.md

   • Read the existing CLAUDE.md at the project root
     • If no CLAUDE.md exists, use

       AskUserQuestion

       to ask if one should be created
     • If user declines, skip this action
   • Draft updates based on analysis insights — focus on:
     • Key patterns and conventions discovered
     • Critical files and their roles
     • Important dependencies
     • Architectural decisions and constraints
   • Present the draft to the user for approval using

     AskUserQuestion

     with options:
     • Apply — Apply the drafted updates
     • Modify — Let the user describe what to change, then re-draft
     • Skip — Skip this action entirely
   • If approved, apply updates using the Edit tool (or Write tool if creating new)

   Action: Keep Insights in Memory

   • Present a condensed Codebase Quick Reference inline in the conversation:
     • Architecture — 1-2 sentence summary of how the codebase is structured
     • Key Files — 3-5 most critical files with one-line descriptions
     • Conventions — Important patterns and naming conventions
     • Tech Stack — Core technologies and frameworks
     • Watch Out For — Top risks or complexity hotspots
   • No file is written — this summary stays in conversation context for reference during the session

   Action: Address Actionable Insights

   IMPORTANT: This action always executes last among all selected actions. Code changes could invalidate analysis if documentation is generated after, and this is the most interactive action — it should not block simpler actions.

   Step 1: Extract actionable items from the report

   Parse the Phase 3 report (in conversation context) to extract items from:

   • Challenges & Risks table rows — title from Challenge column, severity from Severity column, description from Impact column
   • Recommendations section — each numbered item; infer severity from linked challenges (High if linked to a High challenge, otherwise Medium)
   • Other findings with concrete fixes — default to Low severity

   If no actionable items are found, inform the user and skip this action.

   Step 2: Present severity-ranked item list

   • Load reference template from

     ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/codebase-analysis/references/actionable-insights-template.md

   • Present items sorted High → Medium → Low, each showing:
     • Title
     • Severity (High / Medium / Low)
     • Source section (Challenges & Risks, Recommendations, or Other)
     • Brief description
   • Use

     AskUserQuestion

     with

     multiSelect: true

     for the user to select which items to address
   • If no items selected, skip this action

   Step 3: Process each selected item in priority order (High → Medium → Low)

   For each item:

   1. Assess complexity:

      • Simple — Single file, clear fix, localized change
      • Complex — Multi-file, architectural impact, requires investigation

   2. Plan the fix:

      • Simple: Read the target file, propose changes directly
      • Complex (architectural): Launch

        dev-tools:code-architect

        agent with

        model: "opus"

        to design the fix
      • Complex (needs investigation): Launch

        dev-tools:code-explorer

        agent to investigate before proposing

   3. Present proposal: Show files to modify, specific changes, and rationale

   4. User approval via

      AskUserQuestion

      :
      • Apply — Execute changes with Edit/Write tools, confirm success
      • Skip — Record the skip, move to next item
      • Modify — User describes adjustments, re-propose the fix (max 3 revision cycles, then must Apply or Skip)

   Step 4: Summarize results

   Present a summary covering:

   • Items addressed (with list of files modified per item)
   • Items skipped
   • Total files modified table

3. Complete the workflow: Summarize which actions were executed and confirm the workflow is complete.

---

Error Handling

If any phase fails:

1. Explain what went wrong
2. Ask the user how to proceed:
   • Retry the phase
   • Skip to next phase (with partial results)
   • Abort the workflow

---

Agent Coordination

When launching parallel agents:

• Give each agent a distinct focus area to minimize overlap
• Wait for all agents to complete before proceeding to synthesis
• Handle agent failures gracefully — continue with partial results

When calling Task tool for agents:

• Use

  model: "opus"

  for codebase-synthesizer agent
• Use default model (sonnet) for code-explorer agents

---

Additional Resources

• For report structure, see references/report-template.md
• For actionable insights format, see references/actionable-insights-template.md