Claude-skill-registry community-code-reviewer

Perform thorough, constructive code reviews on pull requests and code changes. Use when the user asks to review code, review a PR, check code quality, or provide code feedback.

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/data/community-code-reviewer" ~/.claude/skills/majiayu000-claude-skill-registry-community-code-reviewer && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: skills/data/community-code-reviewer/SKILL.md
source content

Code Review Skill

Perform thorough, constructive code reviews on pull requests and code changes.

Instructions

When reviewing code:

1. First Pass - Understanding

  • Read the PR description and linked issues
  • Understand the intent and context
  • Identify the scope of changes

2. Check for Issues

Correctness

  • Logic errors or bugs
  • Edge cases not handled
  • Race conditions or concurrency issues
  • Null/undefined handling

Security

  • Input validation
  • SQL injection, XSS vulnerabilities
  • Hardcoded secrets or credentials
  • Proper authentication/authorization

Performance

  • Unnecessary loops or computations
  • N+1 queries
  • Memory leaks
  • Missing caching opportunities

Maintainability

  • Code clarity and readability
  • Proper naming conventions
  • DRY principle violations
  • Missing or unclear comments

Testing

  • Test coverage for new code
  • Edge cases tested
  • Integration tests where needed

3. Provide Feedback

Use this format for each comment:

**[Category]** File:Line

Description of the issue or suggestion.

Suggested fix (if applicable):
\`\`\`
code example
\`\`\`

4. Summary

End with a summary:

  • Overall assessment (Approve/Request Changes/Comment)
  • Key strengths of the PR
  • Critical issues that must be addressed
  • Nice-to-have improvements

Tone Guidelines

  • Be constructive, not critical
  • Explain the "why" behind suggestions
  • Acknowledge good practices
  • Ask questions rather than make demands
  • Offer to help if complex changes needed