Claude-skill-registry complete-spec
Interactive conversation to resolve [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers using /speckit.clarify command. Claude asks questions about missing features, UX/UI details, behavior, and priorities. Updates specs in .specify/memory/ with answers to create complete, unambiguous documentation. This is Step 5 of 6 in the reverse engineering process.
git clone https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/data/complete-spec" ~/.claude/skills/majiayu000-claude-skill-registry-complete-spec && rm -rf "$T"
skills/data/complete-spec/SKILL.mdComplete Specification (with GitHub Spec Kit)
Step 5 of 6 in the Reverse Engineering to Spec-Driven Development process.
Estimated Time: 30-60 minutes (interactive) Prerequisites: Step 4 completed (
docs/gap-analysis-report.md exists with clarifications list)
Output: Updated specs in specs/ with all [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers resolved
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- You've completed Step 4 (Gap Analysis)
- Have
markers in specifications[NEEDS CLARIFICATION] - Ready for interactive clarification session using
/speckit.clarify - Want to finalize specifications before implementation
Trigger Phrases:
- "Complete the specification"
- "Resolve clarifications"
- "Run speckit clarify"
- "Let's clarify the missing details"
What This Skill Does
Uses
/speckit.clarify and interactive conversation to fill specification gaps:
- Use /speckit.clarify - GitHub Spec Kit's built-in clarification tool
- Interactive Q&A - Ask questions about missing features and details
- Update Specifications - Add answers to specs in
specs/ - Resolve Ambiguities - Remove all
markers[NEEDS CLARIFICATION] - Update Implementation Plans - Refine plans in
specs/ - Finalize for Implementation - Ready for
and/speckit.tasks/speckit.implement
Note:
/speckit.clarify provides structured clarification workflow. This skill can also supplement with custom Q&A for project-specific needs.
Process Overview
Step 1: Collect All Clarifications
From
specs/gap-analysis.md and all feature specs:
- List all
markers[NEEDS CLARIFICATION] - Group by feature
- Prioritize by impact (P0 first)
Step 2: Interactive Q&A Session
For each clarification, ask the user:
Example questions:
- "The Analytics Dashboard feature is missing. What charts/metrics should be displayed?"
- "For photo upload, should it be drag-and-drop or click-to-browse?"
- "Should offline sync download full data or just metadata?"
- "What's the maximum number of photos per fish?"
- "For species input, free-text field or autocomplete dropdown?"
Listen for:
- Feature requirements
- UX/UI preferences
- Business logic rules
- Constraints and limitations
- Priority adjustments
Step 3: Update Feature Specs
As user answers questions:
- Add details to feature specs
- Define acceptance criteria
- Specify UI behavior
- Document business rules
- Remove
markers[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Step 4: Confirm Priorities
Review the prioritized implementation plan:
- Are P0 items truly critical?
- Should any features move up/down in priority?
- What's the target timeline?
Step 5: Finalize Specifications
Ensure all specs are:
- Complete (no clarification markers)
- Unambiguous (clear requirements)
- Testable (acceptance criteria defined)
- Prioritized (P0/P1/P2/P3)
Example Interactive Session
Claude:
I found 12 items that need clarification. Let me go through them by priority.
F003 - Analytics Dashboard [P1] This feature is marked as missing. What specific charts and metrics should be displayed?
User:
I want to see:
- Fish count over time (line chart)
- Water parameter trends (multi-line chart)
- Tank health score (gauge)
- Recent alerts (list)
Claude:
Got it! I'll add those requirements to F003.
Should these be real-time updates or daily aggregates?
User:
Daily aggregates for the charts, but real-time for alerts.
Claude:
Perfect. Next question:
F002 - Photo Upload UI [P0] For uploading fish photos, would you prefer drag-and-drop or click-to-browse?
User:
Both options would be ideal.
Claude:
Understood. What's the maximum number of photos per fish?
User:
Let's limit it to 10 photos per fish.
[...continues for all clarifications...]
Output Updates
Updated Feature Specs
Before:
## Analytics Dashboard [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] Status: ❌ MISSING [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] What charts and metrics to display?
After:
## Analytics Dashboard Status: ❌ MISSING Priority: P1 ### Overview Dashboard displaying fish count trends, water parameter history, tank health, and recent alerts. ### Acceptance Criteria - [ ] Fish count over time line chart (daily aggregates) - [ ] Water parameter trends multi-line chart (pH, temp, ammonia) - [ ] Tank health score gauge (0-100) - [ ] Recent alerts list (real-time updates) - [ ] Date range selector (7d, 30d, 90d, all) ### UI Requirements - Responsive design (desktop + mobile) - Charts use Recharts library - Real-time updates for alerts via WebSocket ### API Requirements - GET /api/analytics/fish-count?range=30d - GET /api/analytics/water-params?range=30d - GET /api/analytics/health-score - WebSocket /ws/alerts for real-time alerts
Updated Gap Analysis
Remove resolved clarifications from the list.
Updated Implementation Status
Reflect finalized priorities and details.
Success Criteria
After running this skill, you should have:
- ✅ All
markers resolved[NEEDS CLARIFICATION] - ✅ Feature specs updated with complete details
- ✅ Acceptance criteria defined for all features
- ✅ Priorities confirmed (P0/P1/P2/P3)
- ✅ Implementation roadmap finalized
- ✅ Ready to proceed to Step 6 (Implement from Spec)
Next Step
Once specifications are complete and unambiguous, proceed to:
Step 6: Implement from Spec - Use the implement skill to systematically build missing features.
Interactive Guidelines
Asking Good Questions
DO:
- Ask specific, focused questions
- Provide context for each question
- Offer examples or common patterns
- Ask one category at a time (don't overwhelm)
- Confirm understanding by summarizing
DON'T:
- Ask overly technical questions (keep user-focused)
- Assume answers (always ask)
- Rush through clarifications
- Mix multiple questions together
Handling Uncertainty
If user is unsure:
- Suggest common industry patterns
- Provide examples from similar features
- Offer to defer to later (mark as P2/P3)
- Document the uncertainty and move on
Documenting Answers
For each answer:
- Update the relevant feature spec immediately
- Add to acceptance criteria
- Remove clarification marker
- Confirm understanding with user
Technical Notes
- Use the AskUserQuestion tool for structured Q&A
- Group related questions together
- Prioritize P0 clarifications first
- Keep a running list of resolved items
- Update specs incrementally (don't batch)
Remember: This is Step 5 of 6. After this interactive session, you'll have complete, unambiguous specifications ready for implementation in Step 6.