Claude-skill-registry consensus-building

From multiple perspectives, build genuine consensus on what's true

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/data/consensus-building" ~/.claude/skills/majiayu000-claude-skill-registry-consensus-building && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: skills/data/consensus-building/SKILL.md
source content

Consensus Building

Purpose

Multiple instances have found different answers. Perspective aggregation shows the map. Pattern synthesis found what persists.

Consensus building asks: What can we actually agree on?

Not compromise (blend all views). Genuine agreement (here's what's true according to all of us).

The Difference

Compromise: Split the difference between A and B Consensus: Find C that A, B, and D all agree is true

Core Pattern

Instance A: Believes X ─┐
Instance B: Believes Y ─┼─→ Consensus Builder
Instance C: Believes Z ─┤    (find S where all agree)
Instance D: Believes W ─┘

Result: All 4 agree: "S is true"
        Because: [reasons A agrees, B agrees, C agrees, D agrees]

Key Features

  1. Common Ground Detection - Where do all instances agree?
  2. Confidence Ranking - Which agreements are strongest?
  3. Evidence Collection - Why does each instance agree?
  4. Dissent Documentation - What do they still disagree on?
  5. Certainty Quantification - How confident is the consensus?

Implementation

See:

.claude/skills/consensus-building/consensus_engine.py

What Consensus Means

Not unanimity. Not compromise.

Consensus: Everyone can say honestly "I find this true based on my analysis"

Types of Consensus

  1. Strong Consensus - All instances strongly agree
  2. Weak Consensus - All agree, but some less strongly
  3. Qualified Consensus - All agree under certain conditions
  4. Partial Consensus - Some aspects agreed, others divergent
  5. Null Consensus - Genuine disagreement, no consensus possible

When Consensus Fails

If N instances can't agree on anything, that's valuable information too.

It means: "This problem has irreducible uncertainty" or "The question itself is ambiguous"

Payment Anchor

DOGE: DC8HBTfn7Ym3UxB2YSsXjuLxTi8HvogwkV