Claude-skill-registry-data messaging-audit

Name: messaging-audit
Author: majiayu000

Review positioning and messaging across content

install

source · Clone the upstream repo

git clone https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry-data

Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/

T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry-data "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/data/messaging-audit" ~/.claude/skills/majiayu000-claude-skill-registry-data-messaging-audit && rm -rf "$T"

manifest: data/messaging-audit/SKILL.md

source content

Purpose

Ensure messaging consistency across all content and identify where positioning needs tightening.

Usage

```
/messaging-audit
```
- Full messaging review
```
/messaging-audit [topic]
```
- Focus on specific product/feature messaging

Steps

Scan 05-Areas/Content/ for published content
Extract messaging elements:
- Value propositions mentioned
- Key benefits highlighted
- Target audience descriptions
- Problem statements
- Competitive positioning
Check consistency:
- Same value props across content?
- Consistent problem framing?
- Aligned audience descriptions?
- Unified competitive positioning?
Identify issues:
- Conflicting messages
- Outdated positioning
- Missing key messages
- Inconsistent terminology
Generate audit report with:
- Consistency analysis
- Conflicts found
- Missing messages
- Recommendations for alignment

Output Format

# 🎯 Messaging Audit

**Date:** [Today]
**Content reviewed:** [Count]

## Current Messaging Patterns

### Value Propositions
- "[Value prop 1]" - Used in [X] pieces
- "[Value prop 2]" - Used in [X] pieces

### Problem Statements
- "[Problem 1]" - [X] mentions
- "[Problem 2]" - [X] mentions

## Consistency Issues

### Conflicts Found
1. [Content A] says "[X]" but [Content B] says "[Y]"
2. [Inconsistency description]

### Missing Key Messages
- [Message] not mentioned in [content type]

## Recommendations
1. [Recommendation for alignment]
2. [Recommendation for improvement]