Claude-skill-registry design-solution
Converge on a single recommended solution after brainstorming options. Use when you have multiple candidate approaches and need to analyze trade-offs, select one, and define decision criteria before planning.
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/data/design-solution" ~/.claude/skills/majiayu000-claude-skill-registry-design-solution && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
skills/data/design-solution/SKILL.mdsource content
Design Solution
Converge from multiple options to a single recommended approach.
Position in Workflow
Step 3 of development workflow:
- Understand problem and constraints/research
- Explore solution space/brainstorm-solutions
- Converge on a single solution (THIS)/design-solution- Plan, code, review, ship
Core Principle
Decide deliberately. Evaluate trade-offs, align to constraints, and pick the best fit.
Input
Default: Use the options from the current conversation.
If argument provided:
- File path: Read the file for brainstorming output
- GitHub issue: Fetch with
gh issue view $ARG --comments
Workflow
1. Reconfirm Context
- Restate the problem, constraints, and success criteria.
- Identify any missing information that blocks a decision.
2. Evaluate Options
For each option, assess:
- Pros: Benefits and what it enables
- Cons: Risks and complexity
- Codebase fit: Alignment with existing patterns
- Effort: Low/Medium/High
- Reversibility: Easy/Moderate/Hard to change later
3. Decide
- Rank options against success criteria.
- Select a recommended option.
- State conditions that would change the decision.
4. Capture Open Questions
List unknowns that must be resolved before planning.
Output Format
## Solution Decision ### Context Summary [Brief restatement of problem and key constraints] ### Decision Criteria [What matters most: performance, time, simplicity, extensibility, etc.] --- ### Option Evaluation #### Option 1: [Name] - Recommended [Description] **Pros:** - ... **Cons:** - ... **Codebase fit:** [How it aligns with existing patterns] **Effort:** [Low/Medium/High] **Reversibility:** [Easy/Moderate/Hard] #### Option 2: [Name] [Same structure] #### Option 3: [Name] [Same structure] --- ### Recommendation [Why the recommended option wins, and when you would choose differently] ### Open Questions [Anything that could change the recommendation] ### Next Step Ready to plan implementation. Enter Plan Mode or run `/plan`.
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Fix |
|---|---|
| Skipping decision criteria | State criteria before evaluating |
| Over-weighting novelty | Prefer codebase fit and simplicity |
| Ignoring reversibility | Consider how hard it is to change later |
| Decision without evidence | Call out unknowns explicitly |
What NOT to Do
- Do NOT re-brainstorm options
- Do NOT proceed to planning without a chosen option
- Do NOT hide assumptions or uncertainties
- Do NOT ignore codebase constraints