Claude-skill-registry dex-improve
Workshop an improvement idea into implementation plan
git clone https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/data/dex-improve" ~/.claude/skills/majiayu000-claude-skill-registry-dex-improve && rm -rf "$T"
skills/data/dex-improve/SKILL.mdWhat This Command Does
In plain English: Your design partner for making Dex better. Three ways to use it:
- Workshop an idea — Bring a fuzzy improvement idea, we'll shape it into a concrete plan
- Review what's new — See recent Claude Code changes and how they could improve your system
- Full capability audit — Find features you're not using that could help with your jobs-to-be-done
When to use it:
- "I have an idea but don't know how to implement it"
- "What new Claude Code features should I be using?"
- "Am I getting the most out of this system?"
How to run it:
/dex-improve # Shows menu of options /dex-improve "your idea here" # Jumps straight to workshopping
Entry Point
When invoked, offer these options:
How would you like to explore improvements? 1. **I have an idea** — Workshop a specific improvement 2. **What's new?** — Review Claude Code changes since [last check: DATE] 3. **Full audit** — Review all capabilities vs. your current usage Or just describe your idea and I'll start workshopping.
If user provides $IDEA argument, skip to Mode 1 directly.
Mode 1: Workshop an Idea
Arguments: $IDEA — High-level description of what you want to improve
Phase 1: Understand
Parse the idea and frame it back:
-
Identify which Dex areas are involved:
- Workflows (daily, weekly routines)
- Automation (scripts, hooks, scheduled tasks)
- Relationships (people tracking, meetings)
- Task management (capture, flow, priorities)
- Projects (planning, tracking, health)
- Information retrieval (search, lookups)
-
State your understanding in 2-3 sentences
-
Note any ambiguity that needs clarification
Phase 2: Research + Capability Scan
Build context from multiple sources:
Internal (always check):
06-Resources/Learnings/ # What you've learned so far System/Skills/ # Existing reusable behaviors .claude/commands/ # Existing commands that might overlap System/pillars.yaml # Strategic priorities
External (when needed):
- Search web for latest Claude Code capabilities
- Check official docs at docs.anthropic.com
Check:
- Does similar functionality already exist?
- What existing patterns could we leverage?
Phase 3: Capability Match
Map requirements to optimal Claude Code features:
| Requirement Pattern | Suggested Feature | Why |
|---|---|---|
| "Every time I edit X, do Y" | PostToolUse hook | Automatic trigger after tool completion |
| "Before doing X, check Y" | PreToolUse hook | Validation/confirmation gate |
| "At start of session, load Z" | SessionStart hook | Context injection |
| "Fast search while I work" | Explore sub-agent | Haiku model, runs in parallel |
| "Different perspective on X" | Custom sub-agent | Isolated context, specific focus |
| "Multi-step structured workflow" | Skill | Reusable behavior, always available |
| "Explicit invocation with steps" | Command | User-triggered workflow |
| "Connect to external service" | MCP integration | Tool access to external systems |
Present the capability analysis to the user.
Phase 4: Expand
Suggest 2-3 adjacent improvements:
- Based on capability analysis, what else could we solve?
- Flag compound opportunities (build A, get B nearly free)
- Connect to existing gaps in the system
- Consider synergies with strategic pillars
Frame as: "While we're here, you might also consider..."
Phase 5: Refine
Drive toward concrete requirements through focused questions:
- Ask max 2-3 questions at a time
- Validate capability assumptions
- Confirm implementation approach preference
- Identify acceptance criteria
Loop between Research → Expand → Refine until requirements are solid.
Phase 6: Plan + Update
When requirements are firm:
- Generate the plan document (see template below)
- Save to
plans/dex-improvement-[slug].md - Add any new patterns to
06-Resources/Learnings/ - Add viable future ideas to backlog
Mode 2: What's New?
Review recent Claude Code changes and suggest improvements.
Process
-
Read state file:
System/claude-code-state.json- If missing, this is first run — do a full scan instead
-
Fetch current changelog: Use WebSearch to find latest Claude Code changelog/releases
-
Compare: What's new since
date?last_check -
For each new feature, evaluate:
- Is this relevant to Dex use cases?
- What existing workflow could it improve?
- Does it unlock something previously impossible?
-
Present findings:
📢 Claude Code Updates (since [last check date]) === NEW CAPABILITIES === 1. [Feature Name] - What it does: [description] - How it could help: [specific Dex improvement] - Effort to implement: Low/Medium/High 2. [Feature Name] ... === SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS === Based on these new capabilities, here's what you could build: 1. [Improvement name] - What: [description] - Why: [connects to which pillar/job-to-be-done] - Uses: [which new capability] Want to workshop any of these? (Enter number or describe your own idea)
- Update state file with current date and capabilities seen
State File Format
Location:
System/claude-code-state.json
{ "last_check": "2026-01-22", "last_version_seen": "1.0.30", "features_seen": [ "hooks", "sub-agents", "skills", "commands", "mcp" ], "features_noted": [ { "version": "1.0.30", "feature": "Async hooks", "date_seen": "2026-01-22" } ] }
Mode 3: Full Capability Audit
Review all known Claude Code capabilities against your current system.
Process
-
Inventory current usage:
- Scan
folder for hooks, commands, settings.claude/ - Check
for skillsSystem/Skills/ - Check
for MCP integrationscore/mcp/ - Read
for known patterns06-Resources/Learnings/
- Scan
-
Load capability reference:
- Use the capability match table (from Mode 1, Phase 3)
- Search web for comprehensive Claude Code feature list if needed
-
Gap analysis:
=== CAPABILITY AUDIT === ✅ Using Well: - Commands (12 defined) - Skills (person-lookup) ⚠️ Underutilized: - Hooks — No hooks configured. Could automate: - Session start: Load context automatically - Post-edit: Update related files ❌ Not Using: - Sub-agents — Could parallelize research tasks - MCP beyond tasks — Calendar, email integrations possible === RECOMMENDATIONS === Ranked by impact vs. effort: 1. [High impact, low effort] - Add SessionStart hook to load daily context - Why: Saves 30 seconds every session - Connects to: [pillar] 2. [High impact, medium effort] ...
- Offer to workshop any recommendation the user wants to pursue
Plan Output Template
Create at:
plans/dex-improvement-[slug].md
# Dex Improvement: [Title] **Created:** [Date] **Status:** Planning → In Progress → Complete **Pillar:** [pillar name if configured] ## Overview [2-3 sentence summary of what we're improving and why] ## Requirements - [ ] Requirement 1 - [ ] Requirement 2 - [ ] Requirement 3 ## Capability Analysis | Requirement | Implementation | Feature Type | Rationale | |-------------|----------------|--------------|-----------| | [req] | [how] | Hook/Sub-agent/Skill/Command | [why this approach] | ## Recommended Approach [Which Claude Code features to use and why. Include trade-offs considered.] ## Implementation Steps ### Phase 1: [Foundation] 1. [Step] 2. [Step] ### Phase 2: [Core] 1. [Step] 2. [Step] ## Files to Create/Modify | File | Action | Purpose | |------|--------|---------| | `path/to/file` | Create/Modify | [what] | ## Compound Opportunities [What else we could solve while building this] - [ ] [Adjacent improvement 1] - [ ] [Adjacent improvement 2] ## Acceptance Criteria - [ ] [Testable outcome 1] - [ ] [Testable outcome 2] ## Questions Resolved - Q: [Question that came up] - A: [How we decided]
Example Interactions
Mode 1: Workshop
/dex-improve "Better meeting action item capture" > **Understanding:** You want to improve how action items flow from meetings > into your task system. This touches workflows (meeting processing) and > task management (capture and routing). > > **Current state** (from Learnings): > - Meeting notes go to `00-Inbox/Meetings/` > - Action items manually extracted during review > > **Capability scan:** > - PostToolUse hook could auto-trigger processing after meeting note creation > - Sub-agent could parallel process: action items, follow-ups, person updates > > **Questions:** > 1. Where are items getting lost—during capture, or in follow-through? > 2. Would auto-drafted follow-up emails be valuable?
Mode 2: What's New
/dex-improve > [selects "What's new?"] > 📢 Claude Code Updates (since 2026-01-15) > > === NEW CAPABILITIES === > 1. Async Hooks — Hooks can now run without blocking > - How it could help: Faster session startup > - Effort: Low > > === SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS === > 1. Non-blocking context loading > - What: Load learnings/preferences in background > - Why: Snappier session starts > > Want to workshop any of these?
Mode 3: Full Audit
/dex-improve > [selects "Full audit"] > === CAPABILITY AUDIT === > > ✅ Using Well: Commands (12), Skills (1) > ⚠️ Underutilized: Hooks (0 configured) > ❌ Not Using: Sub-agents, Advanced MCP > > === TOP RECOMMENDATION === > Add SessionStart hook — saves context loading time every session > > Want me to workshop this improvement?
Behaviors
Always Do
- Check internal patterns before suggesting new implementations
- Tie suggestions to user's pillars/jobs-to-be-done when configured
- Update state file after Mode 2 runs
- Offer concrete capability recommendations, not just ideas
Never Do
- Skip the research phase
- Suggest capabilities without explaining why they fit
- Output a plan before requirements are confirmed
- Make changes without explicit approval
Philosophy
This isn't just requirements gathering—it's capability-aware design. The goal is to help you leverage Claude Code's full potential while building exactly what you need, nothing more.