doc-brd

Purpose

Create Business Requirements Documents (BRD) - Layer 1 artifact in the SDD workflow that defines high-level business needs, strategic objectives, and success criteria.

Layer: 1 (Entry point - no upstream dependencies)

Downstream Artifacts: PRD (Layer 2), EARS (Layer 3), BDD (Layer 4), ADR (Layer 5)

Prerequisites

Upstream Artifact Verification (CRITICAL)

Before creating this document, you MUST:

1. List existing upstream artifacts:

   ls docs/BRD/ docs/PRD/ docs/EARS/ docs/BDD/ docs/ADR/ docs/SYS/ docs/REQ/ 2>/dev/null
   

2. Reference only existing documents in traceability tags

3. Use

   null

   only when upstream artifact type genuinely doesn't exist

4. NEVER use placeholders like

   BRD-XXX

   or

   TBD

5. Do NOT create missing upstream artifacts - skip functionality instead

Before creating a BRD, read:

1. Shared Standards:

   .claude/skills/doc-flow/SHARED_CONTENT.md

2. Template:

   ai_dev_flow/BRD/BRD-TEMPLATE.md

3. Creation Rules:

   ai_dev_flow/BRD/BRD_CREATION_RULES.md

4. Validation Rules:

   ai_dev_flow/BRD/BRD_VALIDATION_RULES.md

5. Platform vs Feature Guide:

   ai_dev_flow/PLATFORM_VS_FEATURE_BRD.md

For New Projects: Use

project-init

Pre-Flight Check (MANDATORY)

Before creating ANY BRD section, confirm:

1. ✅ Read

   ai_dev_flow/ID_NAMING_STANDARDS.md

   - Element Type Codes table
2. ✅ Element ID format:

   BRD.{DOC_NUM}.{ELEM_TYPE}.{SEQ}

   (4 segments, dots)

Common Element Types:

⚠️ Removed Patterns: Do NOT use

AC-XXX

,

FR-XXX

,

BC-XXX

,

BO-XXX

formats.

When to Use This Skill

Use

doc-brd

• Starting a new project or feature
• Defining business requirements and objectives
• Documenting strategic alignment and market context
• Establishing success criteria and stakeholder needs
• You are at Layer 1 of the SDD workflow

BRD Categorization: Platform vs Feature

CRITICAL DECISION: Before creating a BRD, determine if it's a Platform BRD or Feature BRD.

Questionnaire

1. Does this BRD define infrastructure, technology stack, or cross-cutting concerns?

   • Yes → Likely Platform BRD
   • No → Continue

2. Does this BRD describe a specific user-facing workflow or feature?

   • Yes → Likely Feature BRD
   • No → Continue

3. Will other BRDs depend on or reference this BRD's architectural decisions?

   • Yes → Likely Platform BRD
   • No → Likely Feature BRD

4. Does this BRD establish patterns, standards, or capabilities used across multiple features?

   • Yes → Platform BRD
   • No → Feature BRD

5. Does this BRD implement functionality on top of existing platform capabilities?

   • Yes → Feature BRD
   • No → Platform BRD

Auto-Detection Logic

• Title contains "Platform", "Architecture", "Infrastructure", "Integration" → Platform BRD
• Title contains specific workflow names, user types (B2C, B2B), or feature names → Feature BRD
• References/depends on BRD-01 or foundation ADRs → Feature BRD
• Establishes technology choices or system-wide patterns → Platform BRD

Workflow Differences

Platform BRD Path:

1. Create Platform BRD (populate sections 3.6 and 3.7)
2. Create ADRs for critical technology decisions (identified in BRD sections 3.6/3.7)
3. Create PRD referencing Platform BRD and ADRs
4. Create additional ADRs for implementation details
5. Continue to SPEC

Feature BRD Path:

1. Create Feature BRD (reference Platform BRD in sections 3.6 and 3.7)
2. Create PRD for feature
3. Create ADRs for implementation decisions (if needed)
4. Continue to SPEC

Section 3.6 & 3.7 Rules

Platform BRD:

• MUST populate Section 3.6 (Technology Stack Prerequisites) with detailed technology choices
• MUST populate Section 3.7 (Mandatory Technology Conditions) with non-negotiable constraints

Feature BRD:

• MUST mark Section 3.6 as "N/A - See Platform BRD-NN Section 3.6" and reference specific items
• MUST mark Section 3.7 as "N/A - See Platform BRD-NN Section 3.7" and reference specific conditions

Reference:

ai_dev_flow/PLATFORM_VS_FEATURE_BRD.md

BRD-Specific Guidance

1. Template Selection

Primary Template:

BRD-TEMPLATE.md - Comprehensive business requirements (general purpose)

• Use for: All business requirements documents
• Sections: Complete 18-section structure
• Best for: Complex projects, regulatory compliance needs
• Location:

  ai_dev_flow/BRD/BRD-TEMPLATE.md

Note: Use the comprehensive template for all BRD documents. For simpler requirements, complete only the essential sections and mark others as "N/A - Not applicable for this scope".

Note: Technical QA standards, testing strategy, and defect management are documented in PRD-TEMPLATE.md Section 21 (product level).

Two Structure Options:

docs/BRD/BRD-NN_{slug}.md

docs/BRD/BRD-NN_{slug}/BRD-NN.S_{section}.md

Monolithic Structure (Flat) - for MVP/small documents:

• Location:

  docs/BRD/BRD-NN_{slug}.md

  (directly in BRD directory, no nested folder)
• H1 Title:

  # BRD-NN: Document Title

  (no

  .S

  suffix)
• Template:

  ai_dev_flow/BRD/BRD-MVP-TEMPLATE.md

  or simplified

  BRD-TEMPLATE.md

• Rule: Do NOT create a folder for monolithic files

Section-Based Structure (Nested) - for large/complex documents:

• Location:

  docs/BRD/BRD-NN_{slug}/BRD-NN.S_{section}.md

• Folder Naming:

  BRD-NN_{slug}/

  where slug MUST match the index file slug
• H1 Title:

  # BRD-NN.S: Section Title

  (includes

  .S

  suffix)
• Index template:

  ai_dev_flow/BRD/BRD-SECTION-0-TEMPLATE.md

• Content template:

  ai_dev_flow/BRD/BRD-SECTION-TEMPLATE.md

• Reference:

  ai_dev_flow/ID_NAMING_STANDARDS.md

  (Section-Based File Splitting)

2. Required Sections (18 Total)

Document Control (MANDATORY - First section before all numbered sections):

• Project Name
• Document Version
• Date (YYYY-MM-DD)
• Document Owner
• Prepared By
• Status (Draft, In Review, Approved, Superseded)
• Document Revision History table

Core Sections:

1. Executive Summary
2. Business Context
3. Stakeholder Analysis
4. Business Requirements
5. Success Criteria
6. Constraints and Assumptions
7. Architecture Decision Requirements (topics needing ADRs, NOT specific ADR numbers)
8. Risk Assessment
9. Traceability (Section 7 format from SHARED_CONTENT.md) 10-16. Additional content sections (see BRD-TEMPLATE.md for full structure)
10. Glossary - Domain terms and definitions
11. Appendices - Supporting materials and references

Platform BRD Additional Sections:

• 3.6 Technology Stack Prerequisites (MUST populate for Platform BRD)
• 3.7 Mandatory Technology Conditions (MUST populate for Platform BRD)

3. Strategy References (MANDATORY)

ALWAYS START WITH STRATEGY: Read relevant

{project_root}/strategy/

Reading Order:

1. {project_root}/strategy/README.md

   - Performance targets, strategy goals

2. {project_root}/strategy/strategy_overview.md

   - Strategic framework

3. {project_root}/strategy/core_algorithm.md

   - Primary algorithm specifications

4. {project_root}/strategy/risk_management.md

   - Risk management policies

5. {project_root}/strategy/selection_criteria/

   - Entry criteria

Every BRD MUST cite specific strategy document sections in Traceability section.

4. Architecture Decision Requirements Section (7.2) - MANDATORY

Purpose: Identify architectural topics requiring decisions with cost-focused, alternatives-based analysis.

Every BRD MUST include Section 7.2: "Architecture Decision Requirements" addressing all 7 mandatory ADR topic categories.

7 Mandatory ADR Topic Categories

Element Type Code:

32

Required Fields Per Topic

Selected

Pending

N/A

Alternatives Overview Table (MANDATORY for Selected status)

**Alternatives Overview**:

| Option | Function | Est. Monthly Cost | Selection Rationale |
|--------|----------|-------------------|---------------------|
| Serverless | Event-driven compute | $200-$800 | Selected - cost-effective |
| Kubernetes | Container orchestration | $500-$2,000 | Rejected - over-engineered |
| VM-based | Traditional VMs | $400-$1,500 | Rejected - manual scaling |

Cloud Provider Comparison Table (MANDATORY for Selected status)

**Cloud Provider Comparison**:

| Criterion | GCP | Azure | AWS |
|-----------|-----|-------|-----|
| **Service Name** | Cloud Run | Container Apps | Fargate |
| **Est. Monthly Cost** | $300 | $350 | $400 |
| **Key Strength** | Auto-scaling | AD integration | Ecosystem |
| **Key Limitation** | Fewer features | Higher cost | Complex pricing |
| **Fit for This Project** | High | Medium | Medium |

Complete Topic Example

### BRD.01.32.01: Infrastructure

**Status**: Selected

**Business Driver**: Customer onboarding workflow requires scalable compute for variable registration volumes.

**Business Constraints**:
- Must support auto-scaling for peak periods (10x baseline)
- Maximum infrastructure cost: $5,000/month
- 99.9% availability during business hours

**Alternatives Overview**:

| Option | Function | Est. Monthly Cost | Selection Rationale |
|--------|----------|-------------------|---------------------|
| Serverless (Cloud Functions) | Event-driven compute | $200-$800 | Selected - cost-effective for variable load |
| Kubernetes (GKE/EKS) | Container orchestration | $500-$2,000 | Rejected - over-engineered for this scale |
| VM-based (Compute Engine) | Traditional VMs | $400-$1,500 | Rejected - manual scaling overhead |

**Cloud Provider Comparison**:

| Criterion | GCP | Azure | AWS |
|-----------|-----|-------|-----|
| **Service Name** | Cloud Run | Container Apps | Lambda + Fargate |
| **Est. Monthly Cost** | $300 | $350 | $400 |
| **Key Strength** | Simple container deployment | Azure AD integration | Largest ecosystem |
| **Key Limitation** | Fewer enterprise features | Higher baseline cost | Complex pricing |
| **Fit for This Project** | High | Medium | Medium |

**Recommended Selection**: GCP Cloud Run - serverless containers with optimal cost-to-scale ratio.

**PRD Requirements**: Evaluate cold start impact on latency. Specify concurrency limits and scaling policies.

Handling N/A and Pending Status

N/A Example:

### BRD.01.32.06: AI/ML Architecture

**Status**: N/A - No AI/ML components in project scope

**Reason**: This feature uses standard rule-based validation. No machine learning, AI agents, or predictive analytics required.

**PRD Requirements**: None for current scope. Flag for Phase 2 evaluation if ML-based fraud detection needed.

Pending Example:

### BRD.01.32.05: Observability

**Status**: Pending - Awaiting infrastructure finalization

**Business Driver**: System monitoring required for SLA compliance.

**Business Constraints**:
- Real-time alerting for system failures
- Minimum 30-day log retention

**Alternatives Overview**: [Placeholder - To be completed after infrastructure selection]

**PRD Requirements**: Complete observability analysis after infrastructure finalization.

Layer Separation Principle

BRD Section 7.2          →    PRD Section 18         →    ADR
(WHAT & WHY & HOW MUCH)       (HOW to evaluate)          (Final decision)
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Business drivers              Technical details          Implementation decision
Business constraints          Deep-dive analysis         Trade-off analysis
Cost estimates                Evaluation criteria        Selected approach

Do NOT write: "See ADR-033" or "Reference ADR-045" (ADRs don't exist yet)

Reference: See

ai_dev_flow/BRD/BRD_CREATION_RULES.md

5. Document Control Section Positioning

CRITICAL: Document Control MUST be the first section at the very top of the BRD (before all numbered sections).

Correct Structure:

# BRD-01: Project Name

## Document Control
[All metadata fields here]

## 1. Executive Summary
[Content here]

Cumulative Tagging Requirements

Layer 1 (BRD): No upstream tags required (entry point)

Tag Count: 0 tags

Format: BRD has no

@

Downstream artifacts will tag BRD (using unified format):

• PRD will include:

  @brd: BRD.01.01.30

  (TYPE.NN.TT.SS format)
• EARS will include:

  @brd: BRD.01.01.30

• All downstream artifacts inherit BRD tags

Tag Format Convention (By Design)

The SDD framework uses two distinct notation systems for cross-references:

Key Distinction:

• @adr: ADR-033

  → Points to the document

  ADR-033_risk_limit_enforcement.md

• @brd: BRD.17.01.01

  → Points to element 01.01 inside document

  BRD-017.md

Unified Element ID Format (MANDATORY)

For hierarchical requirements (BRD, PRD, EARS, BDD, SYS, REQ):

• Always use:

  TYPE.NN.TT.SS

  (dot separator, 4-segment unified format)
• Never use:

  TYPE-NN:NNN

  (colon separator - DEPRECATED)
• Never use:

  TYPE.NN.TT

  (3-segment format - DEPRECATED)

Examples:

• @brd: BRD.17.01.01

  ✅

• @brd: BRD.017.001

  ❌ (old 3-segment format)

Upstream/Downstream Artifacts

Upstream Sources (what drives BRD creation):

• Strategy documents (

  {project_root}/strategy/

  )
• Business owner requirements
• Market analysis
• Stakeholder inputs

Downstream Artifacts (what BRD drives):

• PRD (Layer 2) - Product requirements derived from BRD
• EARS (Layer 3) - Formal requirements from BRD business needs
• BDD (Layer 4) - Test scenarios validating BRD objectives
• ADR (Layer 5) - Architecture decisions for topics identified in BRD Section "Architecture Decision Requirements"

Same-Type Document Relationships (conditional):

• @related-brd: BRD-NN

  - BRDs sharing business domain context

• @depends-brd: BRD-NN

  - BRD that must be implemented first (e.g., platform BRD before feature BRD)

Creation Process

Step 1: Determine BRD Type

Use questionnaire above to determine Platform vs Feature BRD.

Step 2: Read Strategy Documents

Read relevant

{project_root}/strategy/

Step 3: Select Template

Choose appropriate template (comprehensive, simplified, or domain-specific).

Step 4: Reserve ID Number

Check

docs/BRD/

ID Numbering Convention: Start with 2 digits and expand only as needed.

• ✅ Correct: BRD-01, BRD-99, BRD-102
• ❌ Incorrect: BRD-001, BRD-009 (extra leading zero not required)

Step 5: Create BRD Folder and Files

Folder structure (DEFAULT - nested folder per document with descriptive slug):

1. Create folder:

   docs/BRD/BRD-NN_{slug}/

   (folder slug MUST match index file slug)
2. Create index file:

   docs/BRD/BRD-NN_{slug}/BRD-NN.0_{section_type}.md

   (shortened, PREFERRED)
3. Create section files:

   docs/BRD/BRD-NN_{slug}/BRD-NN.S_{section_type}.md

   (shortened, PREFERRED)

Example (Shortened Pattern - PREFERRED):

docs/BRD/BRD-01_platform_architecture/
├── BRD-01.0_index.md
├── BRD-01.1_executive_summary.md
├── BRD-01.2_business_context.md
└── BRD-01.3_requirements.md

Note: Folder contains descriptive slug, so filenames can omit it. Full pattern (

BRD-01.0_platform_architecture_index.md

OPTIONAL (for small documents <25KB):

docs/BRD/BRD-NN_{slug}.md

Step 6: Fill Document Control Section

Complete all required metadata fields and initialize Document Revision History table.

Step 7: Complete Core Sections

Fill all 18 required sections following template structure.

Platform BRD: Populate sections 3.6 and 3.7 with technology details Feature BRD: Mark sections 3.6 and 3.7 as "N/A - See Platform BRD-NN"

Step 8: Document Architecture Decision Requirements

List topics needing architectural decisions (do NOT reference specific ADR numbers).

Step 9: Add Strategy References

In Traceability section, link to specific

{project_root}/strategy/

Step 10: Create/Update Traceability Matrix

MANDATORY: Create or update

docs/BRD/BRD-00_TRACEABILITY_MATRIX.md

• Use template:

  ai_dev_flow/BRD/BRD-00_TRACEABILITY_MATRIX-TEMPLATE.md

• Add BRD entry with upstream sources and downstream artifacts
• Update traceability matrix in same commit after BRD validation passes (see SHARED_CONTENT.md Traceability Matrix Update Workflow)

Step 11: Validate BRD

Run validation scripts:

# BRD structure validation
./ai_dev_flow/scripts/validate_brd_template.sh docs/BRD/BRD-01_*.md

# Link integrity
./ai_dev_flow/scripts/validate_links.py --path docs/BRD/

Step 12: Commit Changes

Commit BRD file and traceability matrix together.

Validation

Automated Validation

BRD-Specific Validation:

./ai_dev_flow/scripts/validate_brd_template.sh docs/BRD/BRD-01_platform.md

Quality Gates Validation:

./scripts/validate_quality_gates.sh docs/BRD/BRD-01_platform.md

Manual Checklist

• Document Control section at top (before all numbered sections)
• All required metadata fields completed
• Document Revision History table initialized
• BRD type determined (Platform vs Feature)
• Sections 3.6 & 3.7 handled correctly for BRD type
• Architecture Decision Requirements listed (no ADR numbers referenced)
• Strategy references in Traceability section
• All 18 sections completed
• Traceability matrix created/updated
• No broken links
• File size <50,000 tokens (standard) or <100,000 tokens (maximum)

Diagram Standards

All diagrams MUST use Mermaid syntax. Text-based diagrams (ASCII art, box drawings) are prohibited. See:

ai_dev_flow/DIAGRAM_STANDARDS.md

mermaid-gen

Common Pitfalls

1. Referencing ADR numbers: Don't write "See ADR-033" in Architecture Decision Requirements section (ADRs don't exist yet)
2. Wrong sections 3.6/3.7 treatment: Platform BRD must populate, Feature BRD must reference Platform BRD
3. Missing strategy references: Every BRD must cite

   {project_root}/strategy/

   sections
4. Document Control not first: Must be at very top before all numbered sections
5. Skipping traceability matrix: MANDATORY to create/update matrix

Post-Creation Validation (MANDATORY - NO CONFIRMATION)

CRITICAL: Execute this validation loop IMMEDIATELY after document creation. Do NOT proceed to next document until validation passes.

Automatic Validation Loop

LOOP:
  1. Run BRD template validation script
  2. IF errors found: Fix issues
  3. IF warnings found: Review and address
  4. IF unfixable issues: Log for manual review, continue
  5. IF clean: Mark VALIDATED, proceed

Validation Command

# BRD structure validation (primary)
./ai_dev_flow/scripts/validate_brd_template.sh docs/BRD/BRD-NN_slug.md

# Link integrity validation
./ai_dev_flow/scripts/validate_links.py --path docs/BRD/

# Quality gates validation
./scripts/validate_quality_gates.sh docs/BRD/BRD-NN_slug.md

Layer-Specific Upstream Requirements

Auto-Fix Actions (No Confirmation Required)

Validation Codes Reference

Quality Gate

Blocking: YES - Cannot proceed to next document until Phase 1 validation passes with 0 errors.

Next Skill

After creating BRD, use:

doc-prd

The PRD will:

• Reference this BRD as upstream source
• Include

  @brd: BRD.NN.01.SS

  tags (unified 4-segment format)
• Define product features and KPIs
• Inherit Architecture Decision Requirements topics

Reference Documents

For supplementary documentation related to BRD artifacts:

• Format:

  BRD-REF-NNN_{slug}.md

• Skill: Use

  doc-ref

  skill
• Validation: Reduced (4 checks only)
• Examples: Project overviews, executive summaries, stakeholder guides

BRD-REF Ready-Score Exemption

BRD-REF documents are EXEMPT from ready-scores and quality gates:

Purpose: BRD-REF documents are reference targets that other documents link to. They provide supporting information, context, or external references but do not define formal business requirements.

Reference: See

ai_dev_flow/BRD/BRD_VALIDATION_RULES.md

Related Resources

• Main Guide:

  ai_dev_flow/SPEC_DRIVEN_DEVELOPMENT_GUIDE.md

• Platform vs Feature Guide:

  ai_dev_flow/PLATFORM_VS_FEATURE_BRD.md

• BRD Creation Rules:

  ai_dev_flow/BRD/BRD_CREATION_RULES.md

• BRD Validation Rules:

  ai_dev_flow/BRD/BRD_VALIDATION_RULES.md

• BRD README:

  ai_dev_flow/BRD/README.md

• Shared Standards:

  .claude/skills/doc-flow/SHARED_CONTENT.md

Quick Reference

BRD Purpose: Define business needs and objectives

Layer: 1 (Entry point)

Tags Required: None (0 tags)

Key Decision: Platform vs Feature BRD

Critical Sections:

• 3.6 Technology Stack Prerequisites (Platform BRD populates, Feature BRD references)
• 3.7 Mandatory Technology Conditions (Platform BRD populates, Feature BRD references)
• Architecture Decision Requirements (list topics, NOT ADR numbers)

Next: doc-prd