Claude-skill-registry executive-summary

Create formal executive summaries from GitHub conversations or meeting transcripts. Use when generating leadership-ready summaries that distill key decisions, alternatives, outcomes, and next steps from complex conversations or meetings. Supports GitHub issues/PRs and transcript URIs (Zoom, Teams, etc.). Outputs are saved to Executive Summaries/ with date-organized structure.

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/data/executive-summary" ~/.claude/skills/majiayu000-claude-skill-registry-executive-summary && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: skills/data/executive-summary/SKILL.md
source content

Executive Summary Skill

Create formal, narrative-driven executive summaries for leadership and stakeholders. This skill handles two primary workflows: synthesizing GitHub conversations (issues, pull requests, discussions) and distilling meeting transcripts (Zoom, Teams, etc.) into concise, decision-focused summaries.

Related Skills

Use

brain-operating-system
skill for:

  • Output directory structure and naming conventions (
    Executive Summaries/YYYY-MM-DD/
    )
  • Date folder creation patterns and file numbering

Use

voice-and-tone
skill for:

  • Narrative construction and paragraph patterns
  • First-person framing when appropriate
  • Crediting collaborators and showing impact

Use

github-interaction
skill for:

  • Fetching complete GitHub conversations (issues, PRs, discussions)
  • Comment and review retrieval patterns
  • Pagination handling

Core Principles

All executive summaries follow these unifying principles, regardless of source:

Narrative-Driven Prose

  • Structure content as dense, logically-connected paragraphs in formal, authoritative tone
  • Avoid bullet points, subheaders, or lists
  • Each paragraph builds on the previous, conveying a cohesive narrative of evolution from initial topic through decisions and next steps
  • Limit length to 3–5 structured paragraphs (GitHub summaries may run longer for complex decisions)

Impact & Decision Focus

  • Include only details that significantly influenced direction, decisions, or outcomes
  • Omit administrative commentary, routine pleasantries, subscription messages, procedural remarks, superficial technical minutiae (code diffs, exact timestamps), or automation events
  • Center on key debates, decisions, constraints, resolutions, and business/user impact
  • Clearly articulate alternatives explored, current status, next steps, and individual responsibilities

Contextual Linking

  • Every piece of cited information must link to its source
  • Attribute statements to individuals by name (no @ symbol on names themselves)
  • Links follow the statement or are integrated into sentences
  • Ensure readers can drill into source material for deeper context

Formal Tone & Authority

  • Use complete, well-structured sentences
  • Integrate all references and links seamlessly without extraneous formatting
  • Write for educated, time-constrained readers

Workflow: GitHub Conversations

For GitHub issues, pull requests, and discussions:

  1. Fetch the complete conversation using the

    github-interaction
    skill. This ensures you capture all comments, reviews, and state changes necessary for context.

  2. Identify the narrative arc: What was the initial problem/request? How did the conversation evolve? What decisions were made?

  3. Apply the rules from references/github-conversations.md, which details:

    • How to structure GitHub-specific summaries
    • Linking patterns for comments, events, and status changes
    • Handling alternative solutions and partial resolutions
    • Ignoring bot-generated events
  4. Save the summary to the correct location (see "Output Location & Naming" section below)

Workflow: Meeting Transcripts

For Zoom, Teams, or other meeting transcripts:

  1. Fetch the transcript from the provided URI using HTTP or platform-specific tools

  2. Parse and prepare the transcript: Extract speaker attributions, timestamps, and key discussion points

  3. Apply the rules from references/transcript-summaries.md, which details:

    • Attribution patterns for named participants
    • How to reference shared documents or screens
    • Handling decisions and action items
    • Appropriate scope and constraints for transcript summaries
  4. Save the summary to

    Executive Summaries/YYYY-MM-DD/##.md
    (use today's date; sequential numbering within each date folder)

Quick Reference: Which Workflow?

SourceUse This WorkflowNotes
GitHub issue, PR, discussion URLGitHub ConversationsFetch using
github-interaction
skill; apply GitHub-specific rules
Zoom/Teams transcript or recording URIMeeting TranscriptsFetch transcript; parse for speakers; apply transcript-specific rules
Email thread, Slack conversationGitHub Conversations (adapted)If available as a GitHub discussion or converted to one, use GitHub workflow; otherwise, treat as narrative text input

Tips for Quality Summaries

  • Start by understanding the arc: Skim the conversation or transcript to understand the trajectory before drafting
  • Prioritize decision impact: What changed as a result of this conversation? Lead with that
  • Use participant names strategically: Name decision-makers and key contributors; anonymize or skip minor commenters
  • Link judiciously but comprehensively: Every claim should be traceable; avoid standalone links
  • Edit for density: Remove connecting words, tighten sentences, but preserve clarity