Claude-skill-registry git-hygiene-enforcer
Establishes git workflow guardrails including conventional commits, commit message hooks, branch naming conventions, PR templates, and code review processes. Provides hook configurations, workflow templates, and emergency bypass instructions. Use when users request "setup git hooks", "enforce commit conventions", "add PR templates", or "standardize git workflow".
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/data/git-hygiene-enforcer" ~/.claude/skills/majiayu000-claude-skill-registry-git-hygiene-enforcer && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
skills/data/git-hygiene-enforcer/SKILL.mdsource content
Git Hygiene Enforcer
Enforce consistent, high-quality git practices across your team.
Core Workflow
- Choose conventions: Select commit format (Conventional Commits, Angular, etc.)
- Setup commit hooks: Install commitlint with git hooks
- Configure branch rules: Define naming patterns and protection
- Create PR templates: Standardize pull request descriptions
- Add workflows: GitHub Actions or GitLab CI for automated checks
- Document process: Write CONTRIBUTING.md with git guidelines
- Provide bypasses: Document emergency override procedures
Conventional Commits
Format:
<type>(<scope>): <description>
Types:
: New featurefeat
: Bug fixfix
: Documentation changesdocs
: Code style changes (formatting, etc.)style
: Code refactoringrefactor
: Test additions or changestest
: Build/tool changeschore
: Performance improvementsperf
: CI/CD changesci
Examples:
feat(auth): add OAuth2 login fix(api): resolve race condition in user endpoint docs(readme): update installation instructions refactor(utils): simplify date formatting logic
Commit Hook Setup
Using Husky + Commitlint
- Install dependencies:
npm install --save-dev @commitlint/cli @commitlint/config-conventional husky npx husky init
- Configure commitlint (commitlint.config.js):
module.exports = { extends: ["@commitlint/config-conventional"], rules: { "type-enum": [ 2, "always", [ "feat", "fix", "docs", "style", "refactor", "test", "chore", "perf", "ci", ], ], "subject-case": [2, "never", ["upper-case"]], "subject-empty": [2, "never"], "subject-full-stop": [2, "never", "."], "header-max-length": [2, "always", 100], }, };
- Add commit-msg hook (.husky/commit-msg):
#!/bin/sh npx --no -- commitlint --edit $1
Using pre-commit (Python)
# .pre-commit-config.yaml repos: - repo: https://github.com/compilerla/conventional-pre-commit rev: v3.0.0 hooks: - id: conventional-pre-commit stages: [commit-msg]
Branch Naming Conventions
Pattern:
<type>/<ticket-id>-<description>
Examples:
feature/AUTH-123-oauth-login bugfix/API-456-user-race-condition hotfix/PROD-789-payment-error refactor/DB-321-optimize-queries
Branch Protection Rules:
- Require PR reviews (1-2 reviewers)
- Require status checks to pass
- Require branches to be up to date
- Enforce linear history (no merge commits)
- Require signed commits (optional)
Pull Request Templates
.github/pull_request_template.md
## Description <!-- Describe your changes in detail --> ## Type of Change - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - [ ] Documentation update ## Related Issue Closes #<!-- issue number --> ## How Has This Been Tested? <!-- Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes --> - [ ] Unit tests - [ ] Integration tests - [ ] Manual testing ## Checklist - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published ## Screenshots (if applicable) <!-- Add screenshots to help explain your changes -->
Alternative: Simple Template
## What <!-- What does this PR do? --> ## Why <!-- Why are we making this change? --> ## How <!-- How did you implement it? --> ## Testing <!-- How can reviewers verify this works? -->
GitHub Actions Workflow
.github/workflows/pr-checks.yml
name: PR Checks on: pull_request: branches: [main, develop] jobs: validate: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 with: fetch-depth: 0 - name: Validate PR title uses: amannn/action-semantic-pull-request@v5 env: GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} - name: Check branch naming run: | BRANCH="${{ github.head_ref }}" if [[ ! $BRANCH =~ ^(feature|bugfix|hotfix|refactor|docs|chore)/.+ ]]; then echo "Branch name doesn't follow convention: <type>/<description>" exit 1 fi - name: Lint commits uses: wagoid/commitlint-github-action@v5 - name: Check for merge commits run: | if git log --merges origin/${{ github.base_ref }}..HEAD | grep -q 'Merge'; then echo "Merge commits detected. Please rebase your branch." exit 1 fi
Git Configuration
.gitattributes
# Auto detect text files and perform LF normalization * text=auto # Explicitly mark files as text *.js text *.ts text *.json text *.md text *.yml text # Binary files *.png binary *.jpg binary *.gif binary *.ico binary *.woff binary *.woff2 binary
.gitignore Best Practices
# Dependencies node_modules/ vendor/ # Environment .env .env.local # Build outputs dist/ build/ *.log # IDE .vscode/ .idea/ *.swp # OS .DS_Store Thumbs.db
Code Review Guidelines
CONTRIBUTING.md Section
## Pull Request Process 1. **Create a branch** following naming convention: `type/description` 2. **Make commits** using conventional commit format 3. **Write tests** for new features or bug fixes 4. **Update documentation** if APIs change 5. **Ensure CI passes** before requesting review 6. **Request review** from 1-2 team members 7. **Address feedback** and update PR 8. **Squash and merge** when approved ## Code Review Checklist **Reviewers should verify:** - [ ] Code is clear and understandable - [ ] Tests cover new/changed code - [ ] No obvious bugs or security issues - [ ] Follows project conventions - [ ] Documentation is updated - [ ] No unnecessary changes included **Constructive feedback:** - Be specific and actionable - Assume good intent - Ask questions instead of making demands - Praise good solutions
Commit Message Validation
commit-msg Hook Example
#!/bin/bash # .husky/commit-msg commit_msg=$(cat "$1") # Check conventional commit format if ! echo "$commit_msg" | grep -qE '^(feat|fix|docs|style|refactor|test|chore|perf|ci)(\(.+\))?: .+'; then echo "Error: Commit message doesn't follow Conventional Commits format" echo "Format: <type>(<scope>): <description>" echo "Example: feat(auth): add OAuth2 login" exit 1 fi # Check message length if [ ${#commit_msg} -gt 100 ]; then echo "Error: Commit message too long (max 100 characters)" exit 1 fi
Emergency Bypass Instructions
Skipping Hooks (Use Sparingly)
# Skip commit message validation git commit --no-verify -m "hotfix: critical production fix" # Force push (use with caution) git push --force-with-lease # Override PR checks (requires admin) # Use GitHub UI: "Merge without waiting for checks"
When Bypass is Acceptable
- Production hotfixes: Critical bugs affecting users
- Reverts: Rolling back problematic changes
- Emergency: Infrastructure outages
Bypass Documentation
Document in CONTRIBUTING.md:
## Emergency Procedures In rare cases, you may need to bypass git hooks: 1. **Commit without hooks**: `git commit --no-verify` - Only for production hotfixes - Fix commit message in follow-up PR 2. **Force push**: `git push --force-with-lease` - After approved history rewrite - Coordinate with team first Always create a follow-up PR to fix any bypassed checks.
Recommended Workflow
## Development Workflow 1. **Start work** ```bash git checkout main git pull git checkout -b feature/TICKET-123-new-feature ```
-
Make changes
# Make your changes git add . git commit -m "feat(api): add user search endpoint" -
Keep updated
git fetch origin git rebase origin/main -
Push and create PR
git push origin feature/TICKET-123-new-feature # Create PR via GitHub/GitLab -
Address feedback
# Make changes git add . git commit -m "fix: address review feedback" git push -
Merge
- Squash and merge via UI
- Delete branch after merge
## Installation Checklist - [ ] Commitlint config (commitlint.config.js) - [ ] Git hooks (.husky/ or .git/hooks/) - [ ] PR template (.github/pull_request_template.md) - [ ] Branch protection rules (via GitHub settings) - [ ] CI workflow for PR validation - [ ] CONTRIBUTING.md with git guidelines - [ ] .gitattributes for consistent line endings - [ ] Emergency bypass documentation ## Best Practices 1. **Keep commits atomic**: One logical change per commit 2. **Write descriptive messages**: Explain why, not just what 3. **Reference tickets**: Include issue/ticket IDs 4. **Rebase before merging**: Keep history clean 5. **Review your own PR first**: Self-review catches many issues 6. **Respond to feedback promptly**: Don't leave PRs hanging 7. **Delete merged branches**: Keep repository tidy 8. **Use draft PRs**: For work-in-progress changes