Claude-skill-registry GitHub Workflow

GitHub workflow patterns for Orchestrator AI. Branch naming, PR process, code review, CI/CD. CRITICAL: Use conventional branch names (feature/, fix/, chore/). PRs require quality gates to pass. Use GitHub Actions for CI/CD.

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/data/github-workflow-skill" ~/.claude/skills/majiayu000-claude-skill-registry-github-workflow && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: skills/data/github-workflow-skill/SKILL.md
source content

GitHub Workflow Skill

CRITICAL: Follow GitHub workflow patterns: conventional branch names, PR process, quality gates, code review.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Creating branches
  • Opening pull requests
  • Setting up CI/CD
  • Reviewing code
  • Managing GitHub workflows

Branch Naming Conventions

✅ CORRECT - Conventional Names

feature/user-authentication
feature/add-api-endpoint
fix/login-bug
fix/memory-leak
chore/update-dependencies
chore/refactor-service
docs/update-readme
test/add-unit-tests

❌ WRONG - Non-Conventional Names

❌ my-feature
❌ bugfix
❌ update
❌ new-stuff
❌ feature_branch (use hyphens, not underscores)

Branch Types

TypePrefixExamplePurpose
Feature
feature/
feature/user-auth
New features
Bug Fix
fix/
fix/login-error
Bug fixes
Chore
chore/
chore/update-deps
Maintenance tasks
Documentation
docs/
docs/api-guide
Documentation updates
Test
test/
test/unit-tests
Test additions
Refactor
refactor/
refactor/service-layer
Code refactoring

PR Process

Step 1: Create Branch

# Create feature branch
git checkout -b feature/user-authentication

# Or fix branch
git checkout -b fix/login-bug

Step 2: Make Changes

# Edit files
vim apps/api/src/auth/auth.service.ts

# Stage changes
git add .

# Commit with conventional commit message
git commit -m "feat(auth): add user authentication"

Step 3: Push Branch

# Push branch to remote
git push origin feature/user-authentication

Step 4: Open PR

  1. Go to GitHub repository
  2. Click "New Pull Request"
  3. Select your branch
  4. Fill PR description:
    • What changed
    • Why changed
    • How to test
    • Screenshots (if UI changes)

Step 5: Quality Gates

PR must pass:

  • Code formatting (
    npm run format
    )
  • Linting (
    npm run lint
    )
  • Tests (
    npm test
    )
  • Build (
    npm run build
    )

Step 6: Code Review

  • Request review from team members
  • Address review comments
  • Update PR as needed

Step 7: Merge

Once approved and quality gates pass:

  • Merge PR (squash and merge recommended)
  • Delete branch after merge

PR Description Template

## Description
Brief description of changes

## Type of Change
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Chore
- [ ] Documentation
- [ ] Refactor

## Changes Made
- Change 1
- Change 2
- Change 3

## Testing
How to test these changes:
1. Step 1
2. Step 2
3. Step 3

## Screenshots (if applicable)
[Add screenshots for UI changes]

## Checklist
- [ ] Code follows project conventions
- [ ] Self-review completed
- [ ] Comments added for complex code
- [ ] Documentation updated
- [ ] No new warnings generated
- [ ] Tests added/updated
- [ ] All tests pass locally

CI/CD Workflow

GitHub Actions Example

# .github/workflows/ci.yml
name: CI

on:
  push:
    branches: [main, develop]
  pull_request:
    branches: [main, develop]

jobs:
  quality:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v3
        with:
          node-version: '18'
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npm run format -- --check
      - run: npm run lint
      - run: npm test
      - run: npm run build

Code Review Guidelines

What to Review

  • Code follows project conventions
  • No hardcoded values (use env vars)
  • Error handling implemented
  • Tests added/updated
  • Documentation updated
  • No security issues
  • Performance considerations

Review Comments

# Good review comment
```typescript
// Consider using environment variable instead of hardcoded value
const apiUrl = process.env.API_URL || 'http://localhost:7100';
# Another good review comment
```typescript
// Should we add error handling here?
const result = await service.call();

## Common Workflow Patterns

### Pattern 1: Feature Development

```bash
# 1. Create feature branch
git checkout -b feature/new-feature

# 2. Make changes and commit
git add .
git commit -m "feat(module): add new feature"

# 3. Push and open PR
git push origin feature/new-feature
# Open PR on GitHub

# 4. Address review comments
git add .
git commit -m "fix(module): address review comments"
git push

# 5. Merge after approval

Pattern 2: Hotfix

# 1. Create fix branch from main
git checkout main
git pull
git checkout -b fix/critical-bug

# 2. Fix and commit
git add .
git commit -m "fix(module): fix critical bug"

# 3. Push and open PR
git push origin fix/critical-bug
# Open PR, request urgent review

# 4. Merge immediately after approval

Branch Protection Rules

Recommended branch protection for

main
:

  • Require pull request reviews (at least 1)
  • Require status checks to pass
    • Format check
    • Lint check
    • Test check
    • Build check
  • Require branches to be up to date
  • Do not allow force pushes
  • Do not allow deletions

Checklist for GitHub Workflow

When working with GitHub:

  • Branch name follows convention (
    feature/
    ,
    fix/
    , etc.)
  • Commits use conventional commit format
  • PR description is complete
  • Quality gates pass before opening PR
  • Code review requested
  • Review comments addressed
  • Branch deleted after merge

Related Documentation

  • Conventional Commits: See Conventional Commits Skill
  • Git Standards: See Orchestrator Git Standards Skill
  • Quality Gates: See Quality Gates Skill