Implementing DDD Architecture

Context (Input)

• Creating new entities, value objects, or aggregates
• Implementing bounded contexts or modules
• Designing repository interfaces and implementations
• Learning proper layer separation (Domain/Application/Infrastructure)
• Need to understand CQRS pattern (Commands, Handlers, Events)
• Code review for architectural compliance

Task (Function)

Design and implement rich domain models following DDD, hexagonal architecture, and CQRS patterns.

Success Criteria:

• Domain entities remain framework-agnostic (no framework imports)
• Business logic in Domain layer, not in Application handlers

• make deptrac

  shows zero violations
• Repository interfaces in Domain, implementations in Infrastructure

---

Core Principle

Rich Domain Models, Not Anemic

Business logic belongs in the Domain layer. Application layer orchestrates, Domain executes.

---

Layer Dependency Rules

Domain ─────────────────> (NO dependencies - pure PHP)
           │
           │
Application ──────────> Domain + Infrastructure
           │
           │
Infrastructure ───────> Domain + Application

Allowed Dependencies:

Layer	Can Import
Domain	❌ Nothing (pure PHP, SPL, domain-specific libraries only)
Application	✅ Domain, Infrastructure, Symfony, API Platform
Infrastructure	✅ Domain, Application, Symfony, Doctrine ORM

Template examples may show Doctrine ODM/MongoDB constructs. In this service, use Doctrine ORM with MySQL (

EntityManagerInterface

,

.orm.xml

mappings).

See: DIRECTORY-STRUCTURE.md for complete file placement guide.

---

Critical Rules

1. Domain Layer Purity

❌ FORBIDDEN in Domain:

• Symfony components (

  use Symfony\...

  )
• Doctrine annotations/attributes
• API Platform attributes
• Any framework-specific code

✅ ALLOWED in Domain:

• Pure PHP
• SPL (Standard PHP Library)
• Domain-specific value objects
• Domain interfaces

2. Rich Domain Models

❌ BAD (Anemic):

class Customer {
    public function setName(string $name): void {
        $this->name = $name;  // No validation!
    }
}

✅ GOOD (Rich):

class Customer {
    public function changeName(CustomerName $name): void {
        // Business rules enforced
        $this->record(new CustomerNameChanged($this->id, $name));
        $this->name = $name;
    }
}

3. Validation Pattern

❌ BAD: Validation in Domain with Symfony

use Symfony\Component\Validator\Constraints as Assert;

class Customer {
    #[Assert\NotBlank]  // ❌ Framework in Domain!
    private string $name;
}

✅ GOOD: Validation in YAML config (Preferred)

# config/validator/Customer.yaml
App\Application\DTO\CustomerCreate:
  properties:
    name:
      - NotBlank: ~
      - Length:
          min: 2
          max: 100

Framework validators should always be used when possible. They provide:

• Centralized configuration
• Easy maintenance
• Standard error messages
• Built-in constraints (NotBlank, Email, Length, etc.)
• Custom validators for business rules

Value Objects should only be used when:

• Framework validators cannot express the business rule
• Complex domain logic requires encapsulation
• The validation is part of domain invariants

See: REFERENCE.md for complete validation patterns.

---

CQRS Pattern Quick Start

Commands (Write Operations)

// src/Core/{Context}/Application/Command/{Action}{Entity}Command.php
final readonly class CreateCustomerCommand implements CommandInterface
{
    public function __construct(
        public string $id,
        public string $name,
        public string $email
    ) {}
}

Command Handlers

// src/Core/{Context}/Application/CommandHandler/{Action}{Entity}CommandHandler.php
final readonly class CreateCustomerCommandHandler implements CommandHandlerInterface
{
    public function __invoke(CreateCustomerCommand $command): Customer
    {
        // Minimal orchestration only
        $customer = Customer::create(
            Ulid::fromString($command->id),
            new CustomerName($command->name),
            new Email($command->email)
        );

        $this->repository->save($customer);
        $this->eventBus->publish(...$customer->pullDomainEvents());

        return $customer;
    }
}

See: REFERENCE.md for complete CQRS patterns.

---

Repository Pattern

Interface (Domain Layer)

// src/Core/{Context}/Domain/Repository/{Entity}RepositoryInterface.php
interface CustomerRepositoryInterface
{
    public function save(Customer $customer): void;
    public function findById(string $id): ?Customer;
}

Implementation (Infrastructure Layer)

// src/Core/{Context}/Infrastructure/Repository/{Entity}Repository.php
final class CustomerRepository implements CustomerRepositoryInterface
{
    public function __construct(
        private readonly DocumentManager $documentManager
    ) {}

    public function save(Customer $customer): void
    {
        $this->documentManager->persist($customer);
        $this->documentManager->flush();
    }
}

Register in

config/services.yaml

:

App\Core\Customer\Domain\Repository\CustomerRepositoryInterface:
  alias: App\Core\Customer\Infrastructure\Repository\CustomerRepository

---

Domain Events Pattern

Recording Events in Aggregates

class Customer extends AggregateRoot  // Provides event recording
{
    public function changeName(CustomerName $name): void
    {
        $this->name = $name;
        $this->record(new CustomerNameChanged($this->id, $name));
    }
}

Event Subscribers

// src/Core/{Context}/Application/EventSubscriber/{Event}Subscriber.php
final readonly class CustomerNameChangedSubscriber implements DomainEventSubscriberInterface
{
    public function __invoke(CustomerNameChanged $event): void
    {
        // React to event (e.g., send notification)
    }
}

See: REFERENCE.md for complete event-driven patterns.

---

Quick Start Workflows

Creating a New Entity

1. Create Entity in

   Domain/Entity/

2. Create Value Objects in

   Domain/ValueObject/

3. Create Repository Interface in

   Domain/Repository/

4. Create Repository Implementation in

   Infrastructure/Repository/

5. Create Commands in

   Application/Command/

6. Create Handlers in

   Application/CommandHandler/

7. Verify:

   make deptrac

   shows zero violations

See: examples/ for complete working examples.

Fixing Deptrac Violations

If

make deptrac

shows violations:

Use: deptrac-fixer skill for step-by-step fix patterns.

---

Constraints (Parameters)

NEVER

• Add framework imports to Domain layer
• Put business logic in Application handlers
• Create anemic domain models (getters/setters only)
• Modify

  deptrac.yaml

  to allow violations
• Skip validation (either in Value Objects or YAML config)
• Use public setters in entities

ALWAYS

• Keep Domain layer pure (no framework dependencies)
• Put business logic in Domain entities/aggregates
• Use Value Objects for validation and invariants
• Create repository interfaces in Domain layer
• Implement repositories in Infrastructure layer
• Use Command Bus for write operations
• Record Domain Events for state changes
• Verify with

  make deptrac

  after changes

---

Format (Output)

Expected Directory Structure

src/Core/{Context}/
├── Domain/
│   ├── Entity/
│   │   └── {Entity}.php          # Pure PHP, no attributes
│   ├── ValueObject/
│   │   └── {ValueObject}.php     # Validation logic here
│   ├── Repository/
│   │   └── {Entity}RepositoryInterface.php
│   ├── Event/
│   │   └── {Event}.php
│   └── Exception/
│       └── {Exception}.php
├── Application/
│   ├── Command/
│   │   └── {Action}{Entity}Command.php
│   ├── CommandHandler/
│   │   └── {Action}{Entity}CommandHandler.php
│   └── EventSubscriber/
│       └── {Event}Subscriber.php
└── Infrastructure/
    └── Repository/
        └── {Entity}Repository.php

Expected Deptrac Output

✅ No violations found

---

Verification Checklist

After implementing DDD patterns:

• Domain entities have no framework imports
• Business logic in Domain layer, not Application
• Value Objects used for validation and invariants
• Repository interfaces in Domain layer
• Repository implementations in Infrastructure layer
• Commands implement

  CommandInterface

• Handlers implement

  CommandHandlerInterface

• Domain Events recorded in aggregates
• Event Subscribers implement

  DomainEventSubscriberInterface

• make deptrac

  shows zero violations
• All tests pass

• make ci

  passes

---

Related Skills

• deptrac-fixer - Fix architectural violations
• api-platform-crud - YAML-based API Platform with DDD
• database-migrations - XML-based Doctrine mappings
• complexity-management - Keep domain logic maintainable

---

Reference Documentation

For detailed patterns, workflows, and examples:

• REFERENCE.md - Complete DDD workflows and patterns
• DIRECTORY-STRUCTURE.md - File placement guide (CodelyTV style)
• examples/ - Complete working examples:
  • Entity examples
  • Value Object examples
  • CQRS examples
  • Event-driven examples

---

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

❌ Business Logic in Handlers

// ❌ BAD: Logic in handler
class CreateCustomerHandler {
    public function __invoke($command) {
        if (strlen($command->name) < 2) {  // ❌ Validation in handler!
            throw new Exception();
        }
        // ...
    }
}

❌ Framework Dependencies in Domain

// ❌ BAD: Symfony in Domain
use Symfony\Component\Validator\Constraints as Assert;

class Customer {
    #[Assert\NotBlank]  // ❌ Framework coupling!
    private string $name;
}

❌ Anemic Domain Models

// ❌ BAD: Just getters/setters
class Customer {
    public function setName(string $name): void {
        $this->name = $name;  // No business rules!
    }
}

✅ GOOD Patterns

• Value Objects enforce invariants
• Domain methods express business operations
• Handlers orchestrate, Domain executes
• Configuration externalized to YAML/XML

---

CodelyTV Architecture Pattern

This project follows CodelyTV's hexagonal architecture patterns:

• Directory structure: Bounded Context → Layer → Component Type
• Naming conventions: Explicit suffixes (Command, Handler, Repository, etc.)
• Layer isolation: Deptrac enforces boundaries
• CQRS: Commands for writes, Queries for reads
• Event-driven: Domain Events for decoupling

See: DIRECTORY-STRUCTURE.md for complete hierarchy.