Claude-skill-registry lean4-ffi-constructor-layout

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/data/lean4-ffi-constructor-layout" ~/.claude/skills/majiayu000-claude-skill-registry-lean4-ffi-constructor-layout && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: skills/data/lean4-ffi-constructor-layout/SKILL.md
source content

Lean 4 FFI Constructor Memory Layout

Problem

When writing C FFI bindings for Lean 4 inductives or structures that contain both object fields (pointers to Lean objects) and scalar fields (small integers like UInt8, UInt16), the memory layout is non-obvious and incorrect assumptions cause assertion failures at runtime.

Context / Trigger Conditions

  • Assertion:
    i < lean_ctor_num_objs(o)
    when calling
    lean_ctor_get(obj, i)
  • Assertion:
    offset >= lean_ctor_num_objs(o) * sizeof(void*)
    when calling scalar getters
  • lean_ctor_get_uint8
    ,
    lean_ctor_get_uint16
    , etc. return garbage values
  • Creating FFI for inductives like:
    inductive SockAddr where
      | ipv4 (addr : IPv4Addr) (port : UInt16)  -- 1 object field, 2 scalar bytes
    

Solution

Memory Layout Rules

Lean 4 constructors store fields in this order:

  1. Object fields (pointers): indices 0, 1, 2, ... accessible via
    lean_ctor_get(obj, i)
  2. Scalar fields (small integers): stored AFTER all object fields

Scalar Offset Calculation

The offset for scalar fields is relative to the START of the constructor's data, not the start of the scalar section. Therefore:

// For a constructor with N object fields:
scalar_offset = sizeof(void*) * num_object_fields + byte_offset_within_scalars

For the FIRST scalar field, the offset is

sizeof(void*) * num_object_fields
.

Which Types Are Scalars?

  • UInt8
    ,
    UInt16
    ,
    UInt32
    ,
    UInt64
    ,
    Float
    ,
    Bool
    Scalar in inductives
  • String
    ,
    Array
    , other inductives/structures → Object (pointer)
  • A structure with ONLY scalar fields (like 4x UInt8) → Still uses constructor, but with 0 object fields

Example: Correct FFI for Mixed Constructor

-- Lean definition
inductive SockAddr where
  | ipv4 (addr : IPv4Addr) (port : UInt16)  -- IPv4Addr is object, UInt16 is scalar
// WRONG - treats UInt16 as object field
uint16_t port = lean_unbox(lean_ctor_get(addr, 1));  // CRASHES!

// CORRECT - UInt16 is scalar at offset after 1 object field
uint16_t port = lean_ctor_get_uint16(addr, sizeof(void*));  // Works!

Creating Constructors with Mixed Fields

// lean_alloc_ctor(tag, num_object_fields, num_scalar_bytes)

// For SockAddr.ipv4: 1 object field (IPv4Addr), 2 scalar bytes (UInt16)
lean_obj_res result = lean_alloc_ctor(0, 1, 2);
lean_ctor_set(result, 0, ipv4_obj);           // Object at index 0
lean_ctor_set_uint16(result, sizeof(void*), port);  // Scalar at offset 8 (64-bit)

Structure with Only Scalars

structure IPv4Addr where
  a : UInt8
  b : UInt8
  c : UInt8
  d : UInt8
// 0 object fields, 4 scalar bytes - scalar offset starts at 0
lean_obj_res ipv4 = lean_alloc_ctor(0, 0, 4);
lean_ctor_set_uint8(ipv4, 0, a);  // offset 0
lean_ctor_set_uint8(ipv4, 1, b);  // offset 1
lean_ctor_set_uint8(ipv4, 2, c);  // offset 2
lean_ctor_set_uint8(ipv4, 3, d);  // offset 3

Verification

  1. Build passes without Lean assertion violations
  2. Run tests that exercise the FFI functions
  3. Values round-trip correctly (create in Lean, read in C, write in C, read in Lean)

Common Mistakes

MistakeSymptomFix
Treating scalar as object
i < lean_ctor_num_objs(o)
assertion
Use
lean_ctor_get_uintN
instead of
lean_ctor_get
Wrong scalar offset
offset >= ...
assertion or garbage values
Use
sizeof(void*) * num_obj_fields
as base offset
Wrong num_scalar_bytesMemory corruption, crashesCount actual bytes: UInt8=1, UInt16=2, UInt32=4, etc.

Notes

  • On 64-bit systems,
    sizeof(void*)
    is 8
  • The scalar offset is in BYTES, not in field indices
  • Multiple scalars are packed contiguously after the object fields
  • Lean's runtime does NOT automatically box small integers in inductives—they're truly stored inline

References

  • Lean 4 source:
    lean.h
    contains the constructor macros with assertions
  • FFI patterns observed in Lean's own C runtime and mathlib FFI code