Dotnet-skills dotnet-biome

Use Biome in .NET repositories that ship Node-based frontend assets and want a fast combined formatter-linter-import organizer for JavaScript, TypeScript, CSS, JSON, GraphQL, or HTML. Use when a repo prefers a modern all-in-one CLI over a larger ESLint plus Prettier style stack.

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/managedcode/dotnet-skills
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/managedcode/dotnet-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/catalog/Tools/Biome/skills/dotnet-biome" ~/.claude/skills/managedcode-dotnet-skills-dotnet-biome && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: catalog/Tools/Biome/skills/dotnet-biome/SKILL.md
source content

Biome for Frontend Assets in .NET Repositories

Trigger On

  • the repo has
    biome.json
    ,
    @biomejs/biome
    , or the user asks for a faster all-in-one frontend formatter-linter stack
  • the repo wants one tool for formatting, linting, and import organization across JS, TS, CSS, JSON, GraphQL, or HTML
  • the team is comparing Biome against ESLint plus Prettier or wants to simplify the current stack

Do Not Use For

  • repos that rely on ESLint plugins or framework-specific rules Biome does not cover yet
  • runtime site audits such as headers, accessibility, and SEO; route that to
    dotnet-webhint
  • cases where a dedicated CSS or HTML tool is still the deliberate owner and no migration is requested

Inputs

  • the nearest
    AGENTS.md
  • package.json
  • biome.json
    or
    biome.jsonc
  • current ownership across ESLint, Prettier, Stylelint, and import ordering

Workflow

  1. Decide ownership first:
    • Biome as the main formatter and linter
    • Biome only for formatting
    • Biome in coexistence with ESLint for plugin gaps
  2. Prefer a repo-local pinned install so CI and developer machines use the same version.
  3. Generate
    biome.json
    only after confirming what the repo wants Biome to own.
  4. Add repeatable scripts to
    package.json
    , for example:
    • biome check .
    • biome check . --write
  5. Keep file ownership explicit:
    • Biome can own formatting, linting, and import sorting
    • webhint still owns site-runtime audits
    • ESLint may stay for plugin-heavy cases the repo intentionally keeps
  6. Start migrations with
    check
    and bounded folders before flipping the whole repo to
    --write
    .
  7. Re-run the frontend build and tests after broad formatting or lint-fix passes.

Bootstrap When Missing

  1. Detect current state:
    • rg --files -g 'package.json' -g 'biome.json*'
    • rg -n '"@biomejs/biome"|"eslint"|"prettier"|"stylelint"' --glob 'package.json' .
  2. Prefer a repo-local pinned install:
    • npm i -D -E @biomejs/biome
  3. Create config deliberately:
    • npx @biomejs/biome init
  4. Add repeatable commands to
    AGENTS.md
    and
    package.json
    , then verify with:
    • npx @biomejs/biome check .
    • npx @biomejs/biome check . --write
  5. Return
    status: configured
    if Biome is now wired with explicit ownership, or
    status: improved
    if the existing setup was tightened.
  6. Return
    status: not_applicable
    when the repo intentionally stays on ESLint-centered ownership and no migration or comparison was requested.

Handle Failures

  • Missing-rule parity with specialized ESLint plugins is an ownership problem; keep ESLint for those files until the gap is intentionally closed.
  • Overly broad
    --write
    runs can cause large churn; start with bounded folders or changed files first.
  • Generated assets or vendored code should be excluded in
    biome.json
    before trusting the signal.
  • If developers complain that Biome and ESLint disagree, define file ownership instead of running both broadly on the same surface by accident.

Deliver

  • explicit Biome ownership and version pinning
  • checked-in config and repeatable
    check
    commands
  • a migration or coexistence plan versus ESLint and other frontend tools

Validate

  • the chosen ownership model is documented
  • CI and local runs use the same Biome version
  • the target globs exclude generated and vendored assets
  • downstream build or test flows still pass after
    --write
    runs

Ralph Loop

  1. Plan: analyze current state, target outcome, constraints, and risks.
  2. Execute one step and produce a concrete delta.
  3. Review the result and capture findings.
  4. Apply fixes in small batches and rerun checks.
  5. Update the plan after each iteration.
  6. Repeat until outcomes are acceptable.
  7. If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return
    status: not_applicable
    with a reason.

Required Result Format

  • status
    :
    complete
    |
    clean
    |
    improved
    |
    configured
    |
    not_applicable
    |
    blocked
  • plan
    : concise plan and current step
  • actions_taken
    : concrete changes made
  • verification
    : commands, checks, or review evidence
  • remaining
    : unresolved items or
    none

Example Requests

  • "Replace Prettier and basic linting with Biome in this repo."
  • "Add Biome to the frontend under ClientApp."
  • "Explain whether we should keep ESLint after adding Biome."