Skills nodejs-core

Debugs native module crashes, optimizes V8 performance, configures node-gyp builds, writes N-API/node-addon-api bindings, and diagnoses libuv event loop issues in Node.js. Use when working with C++ addons, native modules, binding.gyp, node-gyp errors, segfaults, memory leaks in native code, V8 optimization/deoptimization, libuv thread pool tuning, N-API or NAN bindings, build system failures, or any Node.js internals below the JavaScript layer.

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/mcollina/skills
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/mcollina/skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/nodejs-core" ~/.claude/skills/mcollina-skills-nodejs-core && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: skills/nodejs-core/SKILL.md
source content

When to use

Use this skill when you need deep Node.js internals expertise, including:

  • C++ addon development
  • V8 engine debugging
  • libuv event loop issues
  • Build system problems
  • Compilation failures
  • Performance optimization at the engine level
  • Understanding Node.js core architecture

How to use

Read individual rule files for detailed explanations and code examples:

V8 Engine

libuv

Native Addons

Core Modules Internals

JavaScript Internals

  • rules/primordials.md - Using primordials to prevent prototype pollution (required for
    lib/internal/
    )

Build & Contributing

Documentation

  • rules/documentation.md - Updating doc/api/*.md files: structure, link ordering, error docs, code example constraints

Debugging & Profiling

Instructions

MANDATORY: Rebuild before testing

Node.js embeds

lib/
JavaScript files into the binary at compile time via
js2c
. After ANY change to
src/
or
lib/
, you MUST rebuild before running tests.
Without a rebuild, tests run against stale code and results are meaningless.

edit src/ or lib/  →  make -j$(nproc)  →  make lint  →  then test

Never skip the rebuild step. Never run

./node test/...
after editing without building first.

Before starting work, ask the user about their build configuration (Make vs Ninja, debug vs release, what configure flags they use). Do not assume a specific setup. Most of the time,

./configure
has already been run and only
make -j$(nproc)
is needed to rebuild.

See rules/build-and-test-workflow.md for the full workflow including configure flags, lint targets, and test commands.

Core knowledge domains

Apply deep knowledge of Node.js internals across these domains:

  • Core architecture: Node.js core modules and their C++ implementations, V8 GC and JIT, libuv event loop mechanics, thread pool behavior, startup/module-loading lifecycle
  • Native development: N-API, node-addon-api, and NAN addon development; V8 C++ API handle management; memory safety; native debugging with gdb/lldb
  • Build systems: node-gyp, gyp, ninja, make; cross-platform compilation; linker errors; dependency issues; platform-specific considerations (Windows, macOS, Linux, embedded)
  • Performance & debugging: Event loop profiling, memory leak detection in JS and native code, CPU flame graphs, V8 optimization/deoptimization tracing

Quick-reference debugging commands

V8 optimization tracing:

node --trace-opt --trace-deopt script.js
# Checkpoint: confirm no unexpected deoptimization warnings before proceeding to profiling
node --prof script.js && node --prof-process isolate-*.log > processed.txt

Event loop lag detection:

node --trace-event-categories v8,node,node.async_hooks script.js

Native addon debugging (gdb):

gdb --args node --napi-modules ./build/Release/addon.node
# Inside gdb:
run
bt        # backtrace on crash
# Checkpoint: verify backtrace shows the expected call site before applying a fix

Heap snapshot for memory leaks:

node --inspect script.js   # then open chrome://inspect, take heap snapshot
# Checkpoint: compare two consecutive heap snapshots to confirm leak growth before and after the fix; run valgrind --leak-check=full node addon_test.js to confirm no native leaks remain

Node.js-specific diagnostic decision trees

Segfault / crash in native addon:

  1. Is the crash reproducible with
    node --napi-modules
    ? → Run
    gdb
    , capture
    bt
  2. Does
    bt
    point to a V8 handle scope issue? → Check
    HandleScope
    /
    EscapableHandleScope
    usage in the addon
  3. Does it point to a libuv callback? → Inspect async handle lifetime and
    uv_close()
    sequencing
  4. No clear C++ frame? → Check for JS-side type mismatches passed into the native binding

V8 deoptimization / performance regression:

  1. Run
    --trace-opt --trace-deopt
    → identify the deoptimized function and reason (e.g., "not a Smi", "wrong map")
  2. Checkpoint: confirm the same function deoptimizes consistently across runs
  3. Inspect hidden class transitions (
    --trace-ic
    ) and fix property addition order or type inconsistencies
  4. Re-run
    --trace-opt
    to confirm the function is now optimized

Build failure (node-gyp / binding.gyp):

  1. Is it a missing header? → Verify
    include_dirs
    in
    binding.gyp
    and Node.js header installation
  2. Is it a linker error? → Check
    libraries
    and
    link_settings
    entries; confirm ABI compatibility
  3. Is it platform-specific? → Consult
    rules/build-system.md
    for Windows/macOS/Linux differences

Always consider both JavaScript-level and native-level causes, explain performance implications and trade-offs, and indicate the stability status of any experimental features discussed. Code examples should demonstrate Node.js internals patterns and be production-ready, accounting for edge cases typical developers might miss.