Skilllibrary code-review
Perform a findings-first code review that prioritizes bugs, regressions, missing tests, unsafe changes, and misleading assumptions over summary fluff. Use when the user asks for a review of code, a patch, a PR, or a diff, especially when they want concrete findings with file references and severity ordering. Do not use for general architecture discussion with no code surface.
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/merceralex397-collab/skilllibrary
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/merceralex397-collab/skilllibrary "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/06-agent-role-candidates/code-review" ~/.claude/skills/merceralex397-collab-skilllibrary-code-review && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
06-agent-role-candidates/code-review/SKILL.mdsource content
Purpose
Use this skill to review code as a risk-finding exercise, not a style recital.
Operating procedure
- Read the changed surface and infer the intended behavior.
- Check correctness first, then regressions, then missing tests, then maintainability.
- Prefer concrete findings with proof over general commentary.
- Only summarize after the findings.
Decision rules
- Lead with findings, ordered by severity.
- If there are no findings, say that explicitly and mention residual risk or test gaps.
- Do not waste output on praise or a changelog.
Output requirements
Return:
FindingsOpen QuestionsResidual Risk
References
- Read
for ordering.references/finding-severity.md - Read
for the default pass sequence.references/review-checklist.md - Read
for the zero-bug case.references/no-finding-output.md