EGEOagents content-scoring

Name: content-scoring
Author: mverab

Score content against the 10 GEO criteria with evidence and prioritized fixes. Use when users ask to score, rate, evaluate, or estimate ranking strength.

install

source · Clone the upstream repo

git clone https://github.com/mverab/eGEOagents

Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/

T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/mverab/eGEOagents "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/.claude/skills/content-scoring" ~/.claude/skills/mverab-egeoagents-content-scoring && rm -rf "$T"

manifest: .claude/skills/content-scoring/SKILL.md

source content

Content Scoring Skill

When scoring content for GEO optimization:

The 10 GEO Criteria

Score each criterion 0-10:

#	Criterion	What to Look For
1	Ranking Emphasis	"best", "top", "#1", superlatives, leadership claims
2	User Intent	Direct answers, addresses specific needs, solves problems
3	Competitive Diff	Unique advantages, "unlike others", differentiators
4	Social Proof	Stats, testimonials, reviews, customer counts, ratings
5	Narrative	Engaging flow, persuasive language, compelling story
6	Authority	Expert tone, credentials, specific knowledge, confidence
7	USPs	Clear unique value, what makes it special
8	Urgency	Time limits, scarcity, "now", limited availability
9	Scannable	Headers, bullets, short paragraphs, clear structure
10	Factual	Verifiable claims, specific numbers, accurate info

Scoring Guide

0-2: Missing or severely lacking
3-4: Present but weak
5-6: Adequate, room for improvement
7-8: Good, minor improvements possible
9-10: Excellent, near optimal

Output Format

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  📊 GEO CONTENT SCORE                                       │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                             │
│  OVERALL SCORE: XX/100                                      │
│  ██████████████████░░░░░░░░░░  XX%                          │
│                                                             │
│  BREAKDOWN                                                  │
│  ─────────                                                  │
│  1. Ranking Emphasis    ████████░░  8/10                    │
│  2. User Intent         ██████████  10/10                   │
│  3. Competitive Diff    ████░░░░░░  4/10                    │
│  4. Social Proof        ██░░░░░░░░  2/10  ⚠️ Priority       │
│  5. Narrative           ██████░░░░  6/10                    │
│  6. Authority           ████████░░  8/10                    │
│  7. USPs                ██████░░░░  6/10                    │
│  8. Urgency             ░░░░░░░░░░  0/10  ⚠️ Priority       │
│  9. Scannable           ████████░░  8/10                    │
│  10. Factual            ██████████  10/10                   │
│                                                             │
│  TOP PRIORITIES                                             │
│  ──────────────                                             │
│  1. Add social proof (+15-20 points potential)              │
│  2. Add urgency signals (+5-10 points potential)            │
│  3. Strengthen competitive differentiation (+8 points)      │
│                                                             │
│  EVIDENCE                                                   │
│  ────────                                                   │
│  ✓ Good: "industry-leading solution" (ranking emphasis)     │
│  ✗ Missing: No customer testimonials (social proof)         │
│  ✗ Missing: No time-sensitive offers (urgency)              │
│                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Rules

Always show evidence from the actual content
Prioritize improvements by potential impact
Be specific about what's missing and how to fix it
Calculate total score as sum of all criteria