Muse subagent-driven-development
Fast iteration with two-stage review (spec compliance, then code quality)
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/myths-labs/muse
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/myths-labs/muse "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/toolkit/subagent-driven-development" ~/.claude/skills/myths-labs-muse-subagent-driven-development && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
skills/toolkit/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.mdsource content
Subagent-Driven Development
When to Use
digraph when_to_use { "Have implementation plan?" [shape=diamond]; "Tasks mostly independent?" [shape=diamond]; "Stay in this session?" [shape=diamond]; "subagent-driven-development" [shape=box]; "executing-plans" [shape=box]; "Manual execution or brainstorm first" [shape=box]; "Have implementation plan?" -> "Tasks mostly independent?" [label="yes"]; "Have implementation plan?" -> "Manual execution or brainstorm first" [label="no"]; "Tasks mostly independent?" -> "Stay in this session?" [label="yes"]; "Tasks mostly independent?" -> "Manual execution or brainstorm first" [label="no - tightly coupled"]; "Stay in this session?" -> "subagent-driven-development" [label="yes"]; "Stay in this session?" -> "executing-plans" [label="no - parallel session"]; }
vs. Executing Plans (parallel session):
- Same session (no context switch)
- Fresh subagent per task (no context pollution)
- Two-stage review after each task: spec compliance first, then code quality
- Faster iteration (no human-in-loop between tasks)
The Process
digraph process { rankdir=TB; subgraph cluster_per_task { label="Per Task"; "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)" [shape=box]; "Implementer subagent asks questions?" [shape=diamond]; "Answer questions, provide context" [shape=box]; "Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" [shape=box]; "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)" [shape=box]; "Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?" [shape=diamond]; "Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps" [shape=box]; "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" [shape=box]; "Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" [shape=diamond]; "Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" [shape=box]; "Mark task complete in TodoWrite" [shape=box]; } "Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite" [shape=box]; "More tasks remain?" [shape=diamond]; "Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" [shape=box]; "Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch" [shape=box style=filled fillcolor=lightgreen]; "Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)"; "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)" -> "Implementer subagent asks questions?"; "Implementer subagent asks questions?" -> "Answer questions, provide context" [label="yes"]; "Answer questions, provide context" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)"; "Implementer subagent asks questions?" -> "Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" [label="no"]; "Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" -> "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)"; "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)" -> "Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?"; "Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?" -> "Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps" [label="no"]; "Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps" -> "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)" [label="re-review"]; "Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?" -> "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" [label="yes"]; "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" -> "Code quality reviewer subagent approves?"; "Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" -> "Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" [label="no"]; "Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" -> "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" [label="re-review"]; "Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" -> "Mark task complete in TodoWrite" [label="yes"]; "Mark task complete in TodoWrite" -> "More tasks remain?"; "More tasks remain?" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)" [label="yes"]; "More tasks remain?" -> "Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" [label="no"]; "Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" -> "Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch"; }
Prompt Templates
- Dispatch implementer subagent./implementer-prompt.md
- Dispatch spec compliance reviewer subagent./spec-reviewer-prompt.md
- Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md
Example Workflow
You: I'm using Subagent-Driven Development to execute this plan. [Read plan file once: docs/plans/feature-plan.md] [Extract all 5 tasks with full text and context] [Create TodoWrite with all tasks] Task 1: Hook installation script [Get Task 1 text and context (already extracted)] [Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context] Implementer: "Before I begin - should the hook be installed at user or system level?" You: "User level (~/.config/superpowers/hooks/)" Implementer: "Got it. Implementing now..." [Later] Implementer: - Implemented install-hook command - Added tests, 5/5 passing - Self-review: Found I missed --force flag, added it - Committed [Dispatch spec compliance reviewer] Spec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant - all requirements met, nothing extra [Get git SHAs, dispatch code quality reviewer] Code reviewer: Strengths: Good test coverage, clean. Issues: None. Approved. [Mark Task 1 complete]
Advantages
vs. Manual execution:
- Subagents follow TDD naturally
- Fresh context per task (no confusion)
- Parallel-safe (subagents don't interfere)
- Subagent can ask questions (before AND during work)
vs. Executing Plans:
- Same session (no handoff)
- Continuous progress (no waiting)
- Review checkpoints automatic
Efficiency gains
- No file reading overhead (controller provides full text)
- Controller curates exactly what context is needed
- Subagent gets complete information upfront
- Questions surfaced before work begins
v3.0: Coordinator Integration
Enhanced with patterns from Anthropic's internal coordinator architecture.
4-Phase Alignment
This skill maps onto the coordinator's 4-phase workflow:
| Coordinator Phase | SDD Equivalent |
|---|---|
| Research | Implementer reads task, asks questions |
| Synthesis | Controller synthesizes answers into context |
| Implementation | Implementer implements, tests, commits |
| Verification | Spec reviewer + Code quality reviewer |
Key Upgrade: Synthesis Before Dispatch
When providing context to implementer subagents, synthesize — don't dump:
❌ WRONG: "Here's the plan file, go implement task 3" ✅ RIGHT: "Task 3: Add rate limiting middleware. File: src/middleware/rateLimit.ts (create new) Pattern: Follow src/middleware/auth.ts structure. Limit: 100 req/min per IP using sliding window. Store: Redis via existing src/lib/redis.ts client. Tests: src/middleware/__tests__/rateLimit.test.ts"
Continue vs Spawn for Reviewers
- Spec reviewer → Spawn fresh (no implementation bias)
- Code quality reviewer → Spawn fresh (independent assessment)
- Implementer fixing review feedback → Continue (has error context)
Related Skills
— Full multi-agent coordination SOPcoordinator-mode
— Parallel execution patternsdispatching-parallel-agents
— Evidence-based verificationverification-before-completion