Dokploy

Dokploy is a self-hosted PaaS built around Docker, Traefik, and a web control plane. Use it to deploy single applications, Docker Compose stacks, domains, SSL, and operational workflows without building a full platform layer from scratch.

Docs: https://docs.dokploy.com/docs/core

Read the supporting references based on the user's problem:

• For Application vs Docker Compose vs Stack and build-type choices, read rules/build-types.md.
• For installation, domains, environment variables, volumes, CI/CD, zero-downtime, remote servers, and security, read rules/operations.md.
• For exact operational commands and deeper platform details, read deployment-reference.md.
• For build-type specifics, read dockerfile-reference.md, nixpacks-reference.md, or static-reference.md.

When To Use This Skill

Use this skill when the user needs Dokploy-specific judgment, not generic container advice. Typical cases:

• They need help deciding how a repo should be deployed on Dokploy.
• They are unsure whether to use Application, Docker Compose, or Swarm.
• They need to choose between Nixpacks, Dockerfile, Static, or image-based delivery.
• They are configuring domains, HTTPS, ports, environment variables, or volumes in Dokploy.
• They are planning CI/CD, webhooks, remote servers, or zero-downtime deployment behavior.
• They are debugging a Dokploy symptom such as 502s, broken domains, missing env vars, or lost files after redeploy.

Working Style

Drive the answer through a fixed decision order so the recommendation is easy to audit:

1. Choose deployment mode: Application first, Docker Compose only when the service graph matters.
2. Choose build type: Nixpacks for convenience, Dockerfile for control, Static for generated assets.
3. Set runtime contract: container port, environment variables, volumes, health check.
4. Attach ingress: domain, HTTPS certificate, path behavior.
5. Choose rollout path: on-server build for small/simple work, CI/CD + registry for production.
6. Harden only if needed: remote servers, cluster/Swarm, direct UI exposure rules.

If the user did not provide enough detail, ask only for the missing inputs that would change the recommendation:

• Is the workload one deployable app or a multi-service topology?
• Is the output static files, a long-running server, or multiple long-running processes?
• Is this a quick internal deploy or a production rollout that needs reproducibility and safer upgrades?
• Does the app need persistence, custom networking, or companion services?

Response Contract

When giving a Dokploy recommendation, structure the answer in this order:

1. Recommended Dokploy mode: Application, Docker Compose, or Stack.
2. Recommended build path: Nixpacks, Dockerfile, Static, or prebuilt Docker image.
3. Why this fits: tie the choice back to the app shape and operational constraints.
4. Required Dokploy settings: container port, publish directory, env wiring, volume strategy, health check, domain rules.
5. Production caveats: CI/CD, rollout safety, remote server or Swarm concerns if relevant.
6. Next steps: concise, executable actions.

Do not stop at naming a build type. Tell the user what they need to configure in Dokploy for the choice to work.

Application

Nixpacks

Application

Dockerfile

Application

Static

Docker Compose

Core Rules

• Default to Application unless the user truly needs Compose.
• Default to Dockerfile for production recommendations.
• Use Static only when the app produces static output; static domains must target port 80.
• Treat Nixpacks as the convenience path, not the most controlled production path.
• If the user already has a reliable CI pipeline and registry, prefer image deployment over rebuilding on the Dokploy host.
• For Docker Compose, remember Dokploy-managed

  .env

  values may still need

  env_file

  or explicit

  ${VAR}

  wiring.
• For persistent files, prefer

  ../files/...

  bind mounts or named volumes.
• Only recommend zero-downtime behavior when a real health check and rollback-capable update strategy are present.

Recommendation Patterns

Use these defaults unless the user's constraints clearly point elsewhere:

• Laravel or other server runtime headed for production:

  Application

  +

  Dockerfile

  , then add health checks and CI-built images.
• Simple Node or PHP app for fast setup:

  Application

  +

  Nixpacks

  .
• Vite or other generated frontend artifact:

  Application

  +

  Static

  when the output is only built files.
• Existing repo whose value is its compose topology:

  Docker Compose

  .
• User asks about horizontal scaling or Swarm explicitly: consider

  Stack

  , but treat it as an explicit escalation rather than the default.

Troubleshooting Order

When debugging an existing deployment, narrow the failure in this order:

1. Confirm the deploy mode matches the workload shape.
2. Confirm the runtime contract is correct: listener port, publish directory, env wiring, and persistence.
3. Confirm ingress is correct: DNS, domain host/path, HTTPS, Traefik routing.
4. Confirm rollout behavior: health checks, build pressure on host, redeploy requirements for Compose labels.
5. Only then escalate to remote-server, cluster, or security-hardening concerns.

Quick Checks

• Domain broken: verify DNS, Traefik routing, and correct container port.
• 502 during deploy: check app listener, health endpoint, and rollout strategy.
• Build stalls server: move builds to CI/CD.
• Files disappear after deploy: fix the volume strategy.
• Static app fails behind domain: confirm publish directory and port 80.

Common Mistakes

• Recommending Docker Compose for a simple single-service app.
• Using Static for SSR or a server runtime.
• Treating on-host builds as the production default.
• Forgetting that Compose domain changes usually require redeploy.
• Claiming zero-downtime without requiring a real health check.