Learn-skills.dev seo-content-brief
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/NeverSight/learn-skills.dev
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/NeverSight/learn-skills.dev "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/data/skills-md/1nf-sh/skills/seo-content-brief" ~/.claude/skills/neversight-learn-skills-dev-seo-content-brief && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
data/skills-md/1nf-sh/skills/seo-content-brief/SKILL.mdsource content
SEO Content Brief
Create data-driven content briefs via inference.sh CLI.
Quick Start
curl -fsSL https://cli.inference.sh | sh && infsh login # Research target keyword infsh app run tavily/search-assistant --input '{ "query": "best project management tools for small teams 2024" }' # Analyze top-ranking content infsh app run exa/search --input '{ "query": "project management tools small teams comparison guide" }'
Content Brief Template
Every brief should answer these questions before writing begins:
# Content Brief: [Working Title] ## Target - **Primary keyword:** [exact keyword] - **Secondary keywords:** [3-5 related terms] - **Search intent:** [informational / commercial / transactional / navigational] - **Target word count:** [X,XXX words] - **Target URL:** /blog/[slug] ## Search Intent Analysis - What is the searcher trying to accomplish? - What format do top results use? (listicle, guide, comparison, tutorial) - What questions need answering? ## Outline H1: [Title with primary keyword] H2: [Section 1] H3: [Subsection] H2: [Section 2] ... ## Competitors to Beat 1. [URL] — [word count] — [what they do well] — [gap/weakness] 2. [URL] — [word count] — [what they do well] — [gap/weakness] 3. [URL] — [word count] — [what they do well] — [gap/weakness] ## Unique Angle What makes this piece different/better than what already ranks? ## Internal Links - Link TO: [existing pages to link to from this article] - Link FROM: [existing pages that should link to this new article]
Search Intent Types
| Intent | What Searcher Wants | Content Format | Example Query |
|---|---|---|---|
| Informational | Learn something | Guide, tutorial, explainer | "what is CI/CD" |
| Commercial | Compare before buying | Comparison, listicle, review | "best CI/CD tools 2024" |
| Transactional | Buy/sign up | Product page, pricing page | "GitHub Actions pricing" |
| Navigational | Find a specific page | — (don't target these) | "GitHub login" |
Match format to intent. If top 10 results are all listicles, write a listicle. If they're all tutorials, write a tutorial. Fighting the SERP format loses.
SERP Analysis Process
# Step 1: See what currently ranks infsh app run tavily/search-assistant --input '{ "query": "[your target keyword]" }' # Step 2: Analyze top-ranking content infsh app run tavily/extract --input '{ "urls": ["https://top-result-1.com/article", "https://top-result-2.com/article"] }' # Step 3: Find related questions (People Also Ask) infsh app run tavily/search-assistant --input '{ "query": "[keyword] questions people ask FAQ" }' # Step 4: Find content gaps infsh app run exa/search --input '{ "query": "[keyword] [subtopic competitors miss]" }'
What to Extract from Top Results
| Data Point | Why |
|---|---|
| Word count | Sets your minimum (match or exceed top 3) |
| Heading structure | Shows what Google considers complete coverage |
| Topics covered | Every topic they cover, you must cover |
| Topics missed | Your opportunity to be more comprehensive |
| Content format | Listicle, guide, tutorial, comparison |
| Media used | Images, videos, tables, infographics |
| Internal/external links | Reference quality signals |
Keyword Research
Keyword Metrics
| Metric | What It Means | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Search volume | Monthly searches | Depends on niche (100+ for long-tail) |
| Keyword difficulty | Competition level | < 30 for new sites, < 50 for established |
| CPC | What advertisers pay | Higher CPC = more commercial value |
| Search intent | What users want | Must match your content type |
Finding Keywords
# Seed keyword research infsh app run tavily/search-assistant --input '{ "query": "project management software long tail keywords related searches" }' # Find question-based keywords infsh app run exa/search --input '{ "query": "questions about project management tools for startups" }' # Competitor keyword analysis infsh app run tavily/search-assistant --input '{ "query": "site:competitor.com/blog top performing pages topics" }'
Keyword Clustering
Group related keywords into one piece of content:
Primary: "best project management tools for small teams" Cluster: - "project management software small business" - "project management tools comparison" - "simple project management app" - "project management for startups" - "affordable project management software"
One page per keyword cluster. Don't create separate pages for each variation — that's keyword cannibalization.
Heading Structure
Rules
| Rule | Why |
|---|---|
| One H1 per page | SEO standard, contains primary keyword |
| H2s = main sections | Each should target a secondary keyword or question |
| H3s = subsections | Break up long H2 sections |
| Primary keyword in H1 | Direct ranking signal |
| Secondary keywords in H2s | Topical coverage signal |
| Question format for some H2s | Targets "People Also Ask" |
| Logical hierarchy | Never skip levels (H1 → H3 without H2) |
Example Structure
H1: Best Project Management Tools for Small Teams (2025) H2: How We Evaluated These Tools H2: Top 10 Project Management Tools Compared H3: 1. Tool A — Best for [use case] H3: 2. Tool B — Best for [use case] ... H2: Feature Comparison Table H2: How to Choose the Right Tool for Your Team H3: Team Size Considerations H3: Budget Considerations H2: Frequently Asked Questions H3: What is the easiest project management tool? H3: Do small teams need project management software? H2: Conclusion
Word Count Targets
| Content Type | Word Count | When |
|---|---|---|
| Short-form blog | 800-1,200 | News, updates, opinions |
| Standard blog | 1,500-2,000 | How-tos, tutorials |
| Long-form guide | 2,500-4,000 | Comprehensive guides, comparisons |
| Pillar content | 4,000-7,000 | Definitive guides, hub pages |
| Glossary/definition | 300-800 | Quick reference terms |
Rule: match or exceed the average word count of the top 3 ranking results. Don't pad — every word should add value.
On-Page SEO Checklist
| Element | Rule |
|---|---|
| Title tag | Primary keyword + compelling hook, 50-60 characters |
| Meta description | Includes keyword, 150-160 characters, includes CTA |
| URL slug | Short, keyword-rich: |
| H1 | Primary keyword, matches search intent |
| First 100 words | Include primary keyword naturally |
| Image alt text | Descriptive, includes keyword where natural |
| Internal links | 3-5 links to related content |
| External links | 2-3 authoritative sources |
| Schema markup | FAQ, HowTo, or Article schema where applicable |
Content Differentiation
Unique Angles
| Angle | Example |
|---|---|
| Original data | "We surveyed 500 PMs — here's what they use" |
| Expert quotes | Interview practitioners for original insights |
| Real examples | Screenshots, case studies, not just descriptions |
| More comprehensive | Cover subtopics competitors skip |
| More current | Updated data, newer tools, recent changes |
| Better visuals | Comparison tables, infographics, decision trees |
# Generate comparison infographic infsh app run infsh/html-to-image --input '{ "html": "<div style=\"width:1200px;height:800px;background:white;padding:40px;font-family:system-ui\"><h2 style=\"font-size:28px;color:#1e293b;text-align:center;margin-bottom:30px\">Project Management Tools Comparison</h2><table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:16px\"><tr style=\"background:#f1f5f9\"><th style=\"padding:12px;text-align:left;border-bottom:2px solid #cbd5e1\">Feature</th><th style=\"padding:12px;text-align:center;border-bottom:2px solid #cbd5e1\">Tool A</th><th style=\"padding:12px;text-align:center;border-bottom:2px solid #cbd5e1\">Tool B</th><th style=\"padding:12px;text-align:center;border-bottom:2px solid #cbd5e1\">Tool C</th></tr><tr><td style=\"padding:12px;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0\">Free tier</td><td style=\"padding:12px;text-align:center;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0\">✅</td><td style=\"padding:12px;text-align:center;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0\">✅</td><td style=\"padding:12px;text-align:center;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0\">❌</td></tr></table></div>" }'
Internal Linking Strategy
| Type | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Hub → Spoke | Pillar page links to all subtopic articles |
| Spoke → Hub | Subtopic articles link back to pillar page |
| Spoke → Spoke | Related articles cross-link to each other |
| Contextual | Natural in-text links where topic is mentioned |
Rules
- 3-5 internal links minimum per article
- Anchor text should be descriptive (not "click here")
- Link to relevant pages, not random ones
- Update old articles to link to new ones
- Most important pages should have the most internal links
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Problem | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| No SERP analysis | Writing blind, wrong format | Always analyze top 3-5 before writing |
| Wrong intent match | Guide when they want comparison, or vice versa | Match SERP format exactly |
| Keyword stuffing | Penalized, reads poorly | Use naturally, 1-2% density max |
| Ignoring "People Also Ask" | Missing easy ranking opportunities | Answer PAA questions in your content |
| Too short | Can't compete with comprehensive results | Match or exceed top 3 word count |
| No unique angle | Just another "me too" article | Original data, expert quotes, better visuals |
| Keyword cannibalization | Multiple pages competing | One page per keyword cluster |
| No internal links | Wasted link equity, poor site structure | 3-5 internal links per article |
| Missing meta description | Google generates one (often poorly) | Write compelling meta with keyword + CTA |
Related Skills
npx skills add inferencesh/skills@seo npx skills add inferencesh/skills@technical-blog-writing npx skills add inferencesh/skills@web-search
Browse all apps:
infsh app list