NWave nw-test-refactoring-catalog
Detailed refactoring mechanics with step-by-step procedures, and test code smell catalog with detection patterns and before/after examples
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/nWave-ai/nWave
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/nWave-ai/nWave "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/plugins/nw/skills/nw-test-refactoring-catalog" ~/.claude/skills/nwave-ai-nwave-nw-test-refactoring-catalog-af11ca && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
plugins/nw/skills/nw-test-refactoring-catalog/SKILL.mdsource content
Test Refactoring Catalog
Test Code Smells (Full Detail)
L1 Readability Smells
Obscure Test
- Problem: test name does not reveal business scenario being tested
- Detection: generic names like Test1(), ProcessOrderTest(), or names requiring reading test body to understand
- Solution: rename to Given_When_Then or should_do_expected_thing_when_condition format
Before: public void Test1() { /* ... */ } After: public void ProcessOrder_PremiumCustomer_AppliesCorrectDiscount() { /* ... */ }
Hard-Coded Test Data
- Problem: magic numbers and strings obscure business rules being tested
- Detection: numbers like 1000, 0.15, strings without explanation
- Solution: extract to named constants that reveal business meaning
Before: Assert.Equal(850, result.Total); // What discount? After: const decimal EXPECTED_TOTAL = 1000 * (1 - 0.15m); Assert.Equal(EXPECTED_TOTAL, result.Total);
Assertion Roulette
- Problem: multiple assertions without messages make failures unclear
- Detection: multiple Assert.* calls without message parameter
- Solution: add descriptive message to each assertion explaining expected business outcome
L2 Complexity Smells
Eager Test
- Problem: single test verifies multiple unrelated behaviors
- Detection: multiple arrange/act/assert cycles or assertions testing different concerns
- Solution: split into focused tests, one per business scenario
Before: ProcessOrderTest() { /* tests discount AND shipping AND tax */ } After: ProcessOrder_AppliesDiscount() ProcessOrder_CalculatesShipping() ProcessOrder_CalculatesTax()
Prefer parameterized tests for variations of the same behavior.
Test Code Duplication
- Problem: repeated test setup logic across multiple tests
- Detection: same object creation, mock setup, or data builders copied in 3+ tests
- Solution: extract helper methods
Extract: CreatePremiumCustomer(), CreateHighValueOrder()
Conditional Test Logic
- Problem: if/switch statements in test code make tests non-deterministic
- Detection: if, switch, for loops in test methods
- Solution: replace with parameterized tests
# Before: if/else in test # After: @pytest.mark.parametrize("input,expected", [...]) def test_behavior(input, expected): ...
L3 Organization Smells
Mystery Guest
- Problem: test depends on external files or hidden dependencies
- Detection: File.ReadAllText, database queries, external config in tests
- Solution: inline test data or make dependency explicit in test setup
Test Class Bloat
- Problem: single test class contains tests for multiple unrelated concerns
- Detection: test class with 15+ tests covering different features
- Solution: split by feature
Before: UserServiceTests (31 tests) After: UserAuthTests, UserProfileTests, UserNotificationTests
General Fixture
- Problem: shared fixture used by tests with different needs
- Detection: SetUp method creates data used by only some tests
- Solution: move to per-test setup methods or test-specific fixtures
For production code refactoring techniques and mechanics, load the progressive-refactoring skill.