git clone https://github.com/openclaw/skills
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/openclaw/skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/1kalin/afrexai-brand-strategy" ~/.claude/skills/openclaw-skills-afrexai-brand-strategy && rm -rf "$T"
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/openclaw/skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.openclaw/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/1kalin/afrexai-brand-strategy" ~/.openclaw/skills/openclaw-skills-afrexai-brand-strategy && rm -rf "$T"
skills/1kalin/afrexai-brand-strategy/SKILL.mdBrand Strategy Engine
Complete brand building and go-to-market system — from identity foundations through positioning, messaging, visual systems, and launch execution. Works for solopreneurs, startups, and established businesses rebranding.
Phase 1: Brand Discovery & Foundations
Strategy before aesthetics. Every visual decision flows from these answers.
1.1 Brand Purpose Statement
Answer in one sentence: Why does this business exist beyond revenue?
Template: "We exist to [verb] [audience] by [method] so they can [outcome]."
Examples:
- "We exist to arm solo consultants with enterprise-grade tools so they can compete with agencies."
- "We exist to simplify legal compliance for startups so founders can focus on building."
Test: If you removed your company, would anyone notice? The answer reveals your true purpose.
1.2 Brand Values (Pick Exactly 3)
More than 3 = forgettable. Fewer = too vague. Each value needs a behavior — what it looks like in practice.
brand_values: - value: "Radical Clarity" behavior: "We never use jargon. Every email, doc, and UI element passes the 'would my mom understand this?' test." anti_pattern: "Hiding behind buzzwords or complexity" - value: "Speed Over Perfection" behavior: "We ship MVPs in days, not months. We'd rather fix live than polish in private." anti_pattern: "Endless planning cycles, waiting for 'ready'" - value: "Skin in the Game" behavior: "We use our own products daily. Our pricing has a money-back guarantee." anti_pattern: "Recommending things we wouldn't buy ourselves"
1.3 Brand Personality (The Archetype Method)
Pick ONE primary archetype + ONE secondary flavor:
| Archetype | Core Drive | Voice Tone | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sage | Knowledge, truth | Authoritative, measured | Consulting, education, analytics |
| Creator | Innovation, vision | Inspiring, unconventional | Design, tech, creative agencies |
| Hero | Mastery, achievement | Bold, confident, direct | Fitness, coaching, enterprise tools |
| Explorer | Freedom, discovery | Adventurous, curious | Travel, startup tools, research |
| Rebel | Revolution, disruption | Provocative, irreverent | Challenger brands, indie products |
| Caregiver | Service, protection | Warm, reassuring | Healthcare, insurance, support |
| Ruler | Control, stability | Premium, authoritative | Finance, luxury, enterprise |
| Everyman | Belonging, honesty | Friendly, down-to-earth | Community tools, consumer products |
| Magician | Transformation | Visionary, mystical | AI, wellness, life coaching |
| Jester | Joy, humor | Witty, playful | Consumer apps, food, entertainment |
| Lover | Intimacy, experience | Sensual, emotional | Fashion, beauty, hospitality |
| Innocent | Simplicity, optimism | Clean, hopeful | Wellness, kids, organic products |
Output format:
brand_personality: primary: "Rebel" secondary: "Sage" summary: "We challenge the status quo with data to back it up. Think punk rock meets MIT." we_are: ["bold", "evidence-driven", "unapologetic", "sharp"] we_are_not: ["corporate", "safe", "fluffy", "slow"]
1.4 Competitive Landscape Map
Before positioning, know the territory:
competitive_map: category: "[Your market category]" competitors: - name: "[Competitor A]" positioning: "[How they position themselves]" strengths: ["...", "..."] weaknesses: ["...", "..."] price_tier: "premium|mid|budget" brand_vibe: "[1-3 words]" - name: "[Competitor B]" # ... white_space: "[Where NO competitor plays — this is your opportunity]" category_conventions: "[What everyone in this space does — colors, language, promises]" our_contrarian_angle: "[How we'll deliberately break conventions]"
Phase 2: Positioning & Messaging
2.1 Positioning Statement (April Dunford Method)
Fill in each element, then combine:
positioning: competitive_alternatives: "[What would customers use if you didn't exist?]" unique_capabilities: "[What you do that alternatives can't]" enabled_value: "[The measurable benefit those capabilities create]" best_fit_customers: "[Who cares MOST about that value — be specific]" market_category: "[The frame of reference that makes your value obvious]"
Combined statement: "For [best_fit_customers] who [pain point], [Brand] is the [market_category] that [unique_capabilities]. Unlike [competitive_alternatives], we [enabled_value]."
Positioning test — answer YES to all:
- Can a 12-year-old understand what you do from this?
- Does it make clear who this is NOT for?
- Would a competitor cringe reading it? (If not, it's too generic)
- Does it contain a falsifiable claim, not just adjectives?
2.2 Messaging Architecture
Three layers — never mix them:
Layer 1: Strategic Narrative (The Big Idea)
- One paragraph that frames the world as changing, positions you as the guide
- Pattern: "The old way of [X] is broken because [shift]. Companies that [Y] are winning. [Brand] gives you [Z]."
- Used in: About page, pitch deck, keynote openings
Layer 2: Value Propositions (3 Pillars)
value_propositions: - pillar: "[Pillar Name]" headline: "[Benefit-driven, 8 words max]" subhead: "[How it works, 1 sentence]" proof: "[Specific stat, case study, or demo]" objection_it_handles: "[What skeptics say, and how this answers it]" - pillar: "..." - pillar: "..."
Layer 3: Proof Points For each value prop, stack evidence:
- Customer quote (with name + company + result)
- Metric ("43% faster onboarding")
- Third-party validation (award, press mention, certification)
- Demo/screenshot showing it in action
2.3 Ideal Customer Profile (ICP)
icp: demographics: company_size: "[range]" industry: ["...", "..."] revenue_range: "[range]" geography: ["..."] tech_stack: ["..."] # if relevant psychographics: biggest_pain: "[The thing that keeps them up at night]" current_workaround: "[How they solve it today — badly]" buying_trigger: "[What event makes them search for a solution?]" decision_maker: "[Title + what they care about]" influencer: "[Who researches options before the DM sees them]" budget_holder: "[Who signs the check]" anti_signals: # who NOT to target - "[Red flag 1 — e.g., 'wants custom everything']" - "[Red flag 2 — e.g., 'decision cycle > 6 months']" - "[Red flag 3 — e.g., 'budget under $X']" buying_journey: awareness: "[Where they first discover solutions — channels, searches]" consideration: "[What they compare — features, pricing, reviews]" decision: "[What tips them over — demo, trial, social proof, champion]"
2.4 Tagline & Elevator Pitch
Tagline formulas (pick one, refine):
- Verb + Outcome: "Ship faster. Break nothing."
- Contrast: "Enterprise power. Startup speed."
- Challenge: "Stop guessing. Start knowing."
- Promise: "From pipeline to paycheck in 14 days."
- Identity: "Built for builders."
Tagline quality checklist:
- ≤6 words
- No jargon or buzzwords
- Works without context (on a billboard)
- Implies a benefit, not a feature
- Memorable — has rhythm, alliteration, or contrast
Elevator Pitch (30-second): "You know how [target audience] struggles with [problem]? We built [Product] which [solution]. Unlike [alternative], we [key differentiator]. [Customer] used it to [specific result]."
Phase 3: Brand Voice & Tone
3.1 Voice Guidelines
Voice is constant. Tone adapts to context.
brand_voice: voice_in_3_words: ["direct", "warm", "sharp"] writing_rules: - "Short sentences. Max 20 words unless making a complex point." - "Active voice always. 'We built X' not 'X was built by us.'" - "Contractions: yes. 'We're' not 'We are.'" - "First person plural ('we') for company, 'you' for customer." - "No hedge words: 'very', 'quite', 'somewhat', 'a bit.'" - "Specific > vague. '$40K saved' not 'significant savings.'" - "One idea per paragraph. If you need a semicolon, make two sentences." vocabulary: use: ["ship", "build", "real", "prove", "earn", "move", "own"] avoid: ["leverage", "synergy", "streamline", "cutting-edge", "revolutionize", "ecosystem", "holistic"] tone_spectrum: celebration: "Bold, high-energy. Short punchy sentences. Exclamation marks OK (max 1 per paragraph)." education: "Clear, patient, structured. Use examples liberally. No condescension." error_state: "Honest, calm, action-oriented. Say what happened, what we're doing, when it'll be fixed." sales: "Confident, proof-heavy. Lead with outcomes, not features. Never desperate." support: "Warm, specific, fast. Mirror the customer's urgency level."
3.2 Channel-Specific Adaptations
| Channel | Tone Shift | Formatting | Length |
|---|---|---|---|
| Website copy | Benefit-led, scannable | H2s, bullets, social proof | 50-100 words/section |
| Email (marketing) | Conversational, CTA-focused | Short paragraphs, 1 CTA | 150-300 words |
| Email (support) | Warm, solution-focused | Steps numbered, links inline | As short as possible |
| Social (LinkedIn) | Professional, insight-led | Hook → Story → CTA | 150-300 words |
| Social (Twitter/X) | Sharp, pithy, opinionated | Thread for depth, single for hooks | 280 chars or 5-8 tweet thread |
| Blog/Content | Educational, comprehensive | H2/H3 structure, examples | 1500-2500 words |
| Sales deck | Confident, customer-centric | Visuals > text, 6 words/slide | 10-15 slides |
| Product UI | Minimal, action-oriented | Verb-first buttons, no jargon | 3-8 words |
3.3 Brand Voice Scorecard
Rate any piece of content 1-5 on each dimension:
| Dimension | 1 (Off-brand) | 5 (On-brand) | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clarity | Jargon-heavy, confusing | Crystal clear, instant understanding | 25% |
| Personality | Generic, could be anyone | Unmistakably us | 20% |
| Specificity | Vague claims, adjective-heavy | Numbers, examples, proof | 20% |
| Action | Passive, informational | Drives clear next step | 15% |
| Consistency | Contradicts other brand comms | Reinforces brand story | 10% |
| Audience-fit | Wrong level, wrong concerns | Speaks directly to ICP | 10% |
Score: <60 = rewrite. 60-79 = revise. 80+ = publish.
Phase 4: Visual Identity System
4.1 Color Palette
Primary (2 colors):
colors: primary: main: "#[hex]" # Dominant brand color — used in logo, CTAs, headers accent: "#[hex]" # Secondary emphasis — used in highlights, hover states neutral: dark: "#[hex]" # Text, headings (near-black, never pure #000) medium: "#[hex]" # Secondary text, borders light: "#[hex]" # Backgrounds, cards white: "#[hex]" # Page background (often #FAFAFA, not pure white) semantic: success: "#[hex]" warning: "#[hex]" error: "#[hex]" info: "#[hex]"
Color psychology quick guide:
- Blue = trust, stability (finance, enterprise, healthcare)
- Green = growth, health (sustainability, wellness, finance)
- Red/Orange = energy, urgency (food, entertainment, sales)
- Purple = premium, creative (luxury, education, design)
- Yellow = optimism, attention (consumer, youth, caution)
- Black = premium, power (luxury, tech, fashion)
- Teal = modern, approachable (SaaS, fintech)
Ratio rule: 60% neutral / 30% primary / 10% accent
4.2 Typography
typography: heading: family: "[Font name]" weights: ["Bold (700)", "Semibold (600)"] style: "serif|sans-serif|display" body: family: "[Font name]" weights: ["Regular (400)", "Medium (500)"] style: "sans-serif" size_base: "16px" line_height: "1.6" mono: # for code/technical content family: "[Font name]" pairing_rationale: "[Why these fonts work together]"
Safe pairings:
- Modern SaaS: Inter + Inter (single font system)
- Premium: Playfair Display + Source Sans Pro
- Technical: Space Grotesk + IBM Plex Sans
- Friendly: DM Sans + DM Sans
- Editorial: Lora + Open Sans
4.3 Logo Direction Brief
If working with a designer, provide this:
logo_brief: type: "wordmark|lettermark|icon+wordmark|abstract|mascot" must_convey: ["[feeling 1]", "[feeling 2]", "[feeling 3]"] avoid: ["[cliche 1]", "[cliche 2]"] usage_contexts: ["favicon", "social avatar", "email signature", "merchandise"] competitors_look_like: "[Describe what's common in the space]" we_want_to_feel: "[Different how?]" min_size: "Must be legible at 32x32px (favicon)" variations_needed: ["full color", "single color", "reversed (white)", "icon only"]
4.4 Imagery & Photography Style
imagery: style: "photography|illustration|3D|abstract|mixed" mood: "[2-3 adjective description — e.g., 'bright, candid, energetic']" subjects: ["real people working", "product screenshots", "abstract patterns"] avoid: ["stock photo handshakes", "generic office scenes", "clip art"] filters: "[Any consistent treatment — e.g., 'slight warm tint, high contrast']" aspect_ratios: hero: "16:9" social: "1:1" blog: "2:1"
Phase 5: Go-to-Market Strategy
5.1 GTM Motion Selection
| Motion | Best When | Resources Needed | Time to Revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product-led (PLG) | Low price, self-serve, viral potential | Engineering-heavy, analytics | 3-6 months |
| Sales-led | High ACV ($10K+), complex solution | Sales team, collateral | 1-3 months |
| Community-led | Developer tools, niche markets | Content, community management | 6-12 months |
| Content-led | Education market, long buying cycles | Writing, SEO, distribution | 6-12 months |
| Partner-led | Established ecosystem, integrations | Partnerships, co-marketing | 3-9 months |
Decision framework:
- ACV < $1K → PLG or Content-led
- ACV $1K-$10K → PLG + Sales assist
- ACV $10K-$50K → Sales-led + Content
- ACV $50K+ → Sales-led + Partner
5.2 Launch Playbook
Pre-launch (T-30 to T-0):
pre_launch: week_4: - "Finalize positioning & messaging (Phase 2)" - "Set up analytics (website, product, marketing)" - "Create launch landing page with waitlist/early access" week_3: - "Draft all launch content (blog, email, social)" - "Brief sales team on positioning + battlecards" - "Set up CRM pipeline stages for launch leads" week_2: - "Seed content to early community (beta users, advisors)" - "Prepare PR/media list if relevant" - "Test all funnels end-to-end (landing → signup → onboarding → payment)" week_1: - "Final content review (voice scorecard — all pieces score 80+)" - "Load email sequences" - "Prepare real-time monitoring dashboard" - "Write the 'things went wrong' playbook (site down, negative feedback, etc.)"
Launch day checklist:
- Publish landing page / make product public
- Send email to waitlist / existing customers
- Post to primary social channels (stagger by 2 hours)
- Submit to relevant directories (Product Hunt, HN, industry-specific)
- Monitor: traffic, signups, errors, social mentions (every 30 min)
- Respond to every comment/question within 1 hour
- End-of-day: metrics snapshot + lessons learned
Post-launch (T+1 to T+30):
- Day 1-3: Respond to all feedback, fix critical issues
- Day 4-7: First customer stories / testimonials
- Day 8-14: Analyze funnel — where are people dropping?
- Day 15-30: Iterate messaging based on what resonated
5.3 Channel Strategy
For each channel, define:
channels: - name: "[Channel name]" purpose: "awareness|consideration|conversion|retention" target_audience: "[Specific segment]" content_types: ["...", "..."] posting_cadence: "[frequency]" kpi: "[Primary metric]" target: "[Specific number by when]" budget: "[$/month or time investment]" owner: "[Who manages this]"
5.4 Sales Battlecard
battlecard: competitor: "[Name]" their_pitch: "[How they describe themselves]" their_strengths: ["...", "..."] their_weaknesses: ["...", "..."] landmine_questions: # Questions that expose their weakness - "[Question that makes prospect think about competitor's gap]" - "..." our_counter: when_they_say: "[Competitor claim]" we_say: "[Our response — specific, proof-backed]" win_themes: ["...", "..."] loss_reasons: ["...", "..."] trap_to_avoid: "[What NOT to say when this competitor comes up]"
Phase 6: Brand Measurement & Evolution
6.1 Brand Health Dashboard
Track monthly:
| Metric | How to Measure | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Aided awareness | Survey: "Have you heard of [Brand]?" | Track trend |
| Share of voice | Brand mentions vs competitors (social, search) | Growing |
| Brand sentiment | % positive/neutral/negative mentions | >70% positive |
| NPS | "How likely to recommend?" (0-10) | >40 |
| Direct traffic | People typing your URL | Growing MoM |
| Branded search | "[Brand name]" Google searches | Growing MoM |
| Repeat purchase rate | Returning customers / total customers | >30% |
| Content engagement | Avg time on page, shares, saves | Improving |
6.2 Brand Audit (Quarterly)
Run this checklist every quarter:
Consistency check:
- All customer-facing channels use current logo, colors, fonts
- Website copy matches current positioning statement
- Sales materials match current messaging architecture
- Social profiles have consistent bios, links, imagery
- Email templates use current brand voice
Effectiveness check:
- Voice scorecard: score 5 recent content pieces — average 80+?
- Review last quarter's campaigns — which messaging resonated most?
- Read 10 recent customer reviews — do they echo our intended positioning?
- Mystery shop: visit our own site fresh — is the value prop clear in 5 seconds?
Evolution signals:
- Market has shifted — new competitors, new category, new buyer expectations
- Product has expanded — brand no longer covers what we actually do
- Audience has changed — attracting different customers than ICP
- Values feel hollow — things we say we value but don't practice
6.3 Rebrand Decision Framework
Don't rebrand when:
- You're bored of your own brand (customers aren't)
- A competitor changed their brand
- Revenue is flat (brand probably isn't the problem)
- New leadership just "wants their stamp"
Do rebrand when:
- Brand actively confuses people about what you do
- Product pivot makes current positioning misleading
- Merger/acquisition requires unified identity
- Negative brand associations that can't be overcome with marketing
- Outgrew the original brand (started as SMB tool, now enterprise)
Rebrand scope options:
- Refresh (low risk): Update colors, fonts, imagery. Keep name + positioning.
- Reposition (medium risk): Same name, new messaging + visual system.
- Rename (high risk): New name, new everything. Only when absolutely necessary.
Edge Cases & Advanced Patterns
Multi-Brand Architecture
If you manage multiple products/brands:
| Strategy | When | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Branded House | Products share master brand | Google Maps, Google Drive |
| House of Brands | Products have distinct identities | P&G → Tide, Gillette, Pampers |
| Endorsed | Sub-brands with parent endorsement | Marriott → Courtyard by Marriott |
| Hybrid | Mix based on product type | Apple (branded house) + Beats (endorsed) |
Personal Brand vs Company Brand
When founder IS the brand:
- Company brand: what you build (can be sold)
- Personal brand: who you are (can't be sold)
- Build both, but ensure the company can survive without the founder's face
- Use personal brand to drive attention → funnel to company brand for conversion
International Brand Adaptation
Before entering new markets:
- Name check: Does it mean something offensive in local language?
- Color audit: Color meanings vary by culture (white = death in some Asian cultures)
- Voice localization: Translate voice guidelines, not just words
- Local proof points: Global stats don't resonate — find local references
- Legal: Trademark search in target jurisdiction
Brand Crisis Playbook
Severity 1 (Minor — negative review, social complaint):
- Respond publicly within 2 hours
- Acknowledge, don't defend
- Take the conversation private to resolve
Severity 2 (Moderate — trending criticism, competitor attack):
- Internal alignment on response within 1 hour
- Transparent public statement
- Monitor for 48 hours, respond to follow-ups
Severity 3 (Major — data breach, product failure, public scandal):
- CEO/founder response within 4 hours
- Accept responsibility + specific remediation plan
- Regular updates until resolved
- Post-incident: what we changed (not just what we're sorry about)
Quick Reference: Natural Language Commands
| Command | What It Does |
|---|---|
| "Build my brand identity" | Full Phase 1-4 walkthrough |
| "Write my positioning" | Phase 2.1 Dunford method |
| "Create messaging for [product]" | Phase 2.2 full messaging architecture |
| "Define my ICP" | Phase 2.3 customer profile |
| "Write brand voice guidelines" | Phase 3.1 complete voice system |
| "Plan my GTM" | Phase 5 go-to-market strategy |
| "Create a battlecard for [competitor]" | Phase 5.4 sales battlecard |
| "Audit my brand" | Phase 6.2 quarterly checklist |
| "Score this content" | Phase 3.3 voice scorecard |
| "Should we rebrand?" | Phase 6.3 decision framework |
| "Launch plan for [product]" | Phase 5.2 full playbook |
| "Adapt brand for [market]" | International adaptation checklist |